Large-particle calcium hydroxylapatite injection for correction of facial wrinkles and depressions.

BACKGROUND: Small-particle calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse, Merz, Frankfurt, Germany) is safe and effective for facial wrinkle reduction, and has medium-term persistence for this indication. There is patient demand for similar fillers that may be longer lasting. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the safety and persistence of effect in vivo associated with use of large-particle calcium hydroxylapatite (Coaptite, Merz) for facial augmentation and wrinkle reduction. METHODS: This was a case series of 3 patients injected with large-particle calcium hydroxylapatite. RESULTS: Large-particle calcium hydroxylapatite appears to be effective and well tolerated for correction of facial depressions, including upper mid-cheek atrophy, nasolabial creases, and HIV-associated lipoatrophy. Adverse events included erythema and edema, and transient visibility of the injection sites. Treated patients, all of whom had received small-particle calcium hydroxylapatite correction before, noted improved persistence at 6 and 15 months with the large-particle injections as compared with prior small-particle injections. LIMITATIONS: This is a small case series, and there was no direct control to compare the persistence of small-particle versus large-particle correction. CONCLUSIONS: For facial wrinkle correction, large-particle calcium hydroxylapatite has a safety profile comparable with that of small-particle calcium hydroxylapatite. The large-particle variant may have longer persistence that may be useful in selected clinical circumstances.

Safety of peak serum lidocaine concentration after Mohs micrographic surgery: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Large volumes of dilute local anesthesia are increasingly used not only for liposuction but also for other large cutaneous surgeries, including skin cancer excision. Although the lidocaine serum levels and peaks after injection of tumescent anesthesia in the trunk were shown to be safe even when used in high doses, the levels after use of less dilute (1% lidocaine) solutions for facial cancer surgery have not been described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to ascertain whether perioperative peak lidocaine levels during Mohs micrographic surgery approach thresholds for lidocaine toxicity. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, each Mohs micrographic procedure was commenced per routine protocol, with use of injectable 1% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 1:10 8.4% bicarbonate for local anesthesia. Six peripheral blood draws of 5 mL each were performed and sent for serum lidocaine concentration measurement. Blood draws were obtained before and after the first two stages of Mohs micrographic surgery, and before and after the third stage or wound repair, as appropriate. Subjects and investigators reported any symptoms or signs of lidocaine toxicity. The main outcome measures include: (1) number of subjects exhibiting at least one level higher than the threshold for toxicity; and (2) sustained elevated lidocaine levels in one or more subjects. RESULTS: Mean total lidocaine volume per subject was 15 mL (range: 5-48 mL). The highest peak serum lidocaine level detected at any time point (blood draw) for any subject was 0.3 microg/mL. Mean serum lidocaine level for all 6 time points was less than 0.1 microg/mL and was thus not detected. Detectable lidocaine levels were found to be associated with higher mean (P = .028) and median (P = .008) total lidocaine doses. Because no toxic levels were detected, it was not possible to measure sustained high lidocaine levels. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include the lack of use of very concentrated (eg, 2% vs 1%) lidocaine solution. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine use during Mohs micrographic surgery does not appear to result in serum lidocaine levels approaching toxic levels even when relatively high total lidocaine doses are used. There is an association between higher total lidocaine dose and perioperative peak serum lidocaine level.