Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Helicobacter ; 6(3): 249-53, 2001 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11683929

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Resistance of Helicobacter pylori to clarithromycin and metronidazole is now found worldwide. Steam-distilled garlic oil has in vitro activity against H. pylori and may be a useful alternative treatment strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this pilot study dyspeptic patients with positive serology for H. pylori confirmed by 13C urea breath test (UBT), at 0 and 2 weeks, were enrolled. Treatment consisted of one 4 mg garlic oil capsule with a meal four times per day for 14 days. H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative UBT at both follow-up appointments. Suppression was defined as a 50% fall in 13C excess between baseline and follow-up 1. RESULTS: Five patients completed the study. There was no evidence of either eradication or suppression of H. pylori or symptom improvement whilst taking garlic oil. CONCLUSION: These negative results show that, within the gastric milieu, garlic oil at this dose does not inhibit H. pylori. A higher dose administered for a longer time-period may be effective. Antibiotics are usually combined with a proton-pump inhibitor or bismuth salt, as the only antibiotic with any in vivo activity against H. pylori in monotherapy is clarithromycin. A proton pump inhibitor raises gastric pH and, by increasing bacterial division, may increase the in vivo activity of garlic oil. This may be worth pursuing in a future trial.


Assuntos
Compostos Alílicos/uso terapêutico , Dispepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Alho , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Fitoterapia , Sulfetos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Testes Respiratórios , Esquema de Medicação , Dispepsia/microbiologia , Previsões , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto
5.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 12(5): 343-7, 1993 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8394815

RESUMO

Seventy patients with complicated urinary tract infections were treated with either lomefloxacin (400 mg once daily) or norfloxacin (400 mg twice daily) for 10 to 14 days. A total of 19 (86%) of 22 patients treated with lomefloxacin and 20 (74%) of 27 patients treated with norfloxacin were cured, as defined by a negative culture five to nine days after completion of therapy (p = 0.09). After four to six weeks, the figures were 56% for lomefloxacin and 48% for norfloxacin. Adverse effects in the lomefloxacin group were observed on 20 occasions in 12 patients (one stopped treatment) compared to nine occasions in five patients treated with norfloxacin (difference not significant).


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Fluoroquinolonas , Norfloxacino/uso terapêutico , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Infecciosos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Norfloxacino/efeitos adversos , Quinolonas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecções Urinárias/complicações , Urina/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...