Delayed hemispheric neuronal loss in severely head-injured patients.

Recent experimental studies have revealed that traumatic brain injury as well as ischemic brain injury can cause chronic progressive neuronal damage. In the present study, we demonstrate previously unreported delayed cerebral atrophy on computerized tomography (CT) scans in severely head-injured patients. Seventeen severely head-injured patients who required mild hypothermia to control intracranial hypertension after the failure of conventional therapies were retrospectively analyzed. All 17 patients survived more than 1 year. Delayed neuronal loss (DNL) was observed in only eight of the 17 patients. Eight patients with DNL required longer durations of mild hypothermia to control intracranial hypertension than nine patients without DNL. Six of these eight patients with DNL achieved functional recovery despite progressive atrophic changes demonstrated on CT scans. On CT scans, DNL was characterized by (1) the sudden appearance at several months postinjury of a low-density area in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the injury; (2) the preservation of essential cortical structure although related white matter structures showed severe atrophic changes; and (3) no spread of the low-density area to the contiguous territory of the other main cerebral artery. It is concluded that focal primary injury to underlying brain, if severe enough, can result in delayed hemispheric atrophy.

A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of mild hypothermia for severely head injured patients with low intracranial pressure. Mild Hypothermia Study Group in Japan.

OBJECT: The criteria for the use of mild hypothermia (34 degrees C) in severely head injured patients have not been standardized. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine whether mild hypothermia is essential in the treatment of severely head injured patients with low intracranial pressure (ICP). METHODS: At 11 medical centers, 91 severely head injured patients with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less in whom ICP could be maintained below 25 mm Hg by conventional therapies were divided randomly into two groups: the mild hypothermia group (HT group, 45 patients) and the normothermia group (NT group, 46 patients). Patients in the HT group were exposed to mild hypothermia (34 degrees C) for 48 hours, followed by rewarming at 1 degrees C per day for 3 days, whereas patients in the NT group were exposed to normothermia (37 degrees C) for 5 days. The two groups were similar with respect to prognostic factors, and there was no difference in clinical outcome at 3 months postinjury. During treatment, there was a significantly greater use of neuromuscular blocking agents in the HT group (p = 0.011). During the initial 2 weeks postinjury, the incidences of pneumonia, meningitis, leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, and hyperamylasemia were significantly higher in the HT than in the NT group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mild hypothermia should not be used for the treatment of severely head injured patients with low ICP because this therapy conveys no advantage over normothermia in such patients.

Little benefit from mild hypothermia therapy for severely head injured patients with low intracranial pressure.

OBJECT: This study was performed to determine whether mild hypothermia therapy is essential for the treatment of severely head injured patients in whom intracranial pressure (ICP) can be maintained below 20 mm Hg by using conventional therapies. METHODS: Sixteen consecutive severely head injured patients fulfilled the following criteria: the patient's ICP was maintained below 20 mm Hg by using fluid restriction, hyperventilation, and high-dose barbiturate therapy; and the patient had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less on admission. After conventional therapies had been applied, the patients were divided randomly into two groups: the mild hypothermia group (HT group; eight patients) and the normothermia group (NT group; eight patients). The HT group received mild hypothermia (intracranial temperature 34 degrees C) therapy for 48 hours followed by rewarming at 1 degree C per day for 3 days, whereas the NT group received normothermia (intracranial temperature 37 degrees C) therapy for 5 days. Specimens of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) taken from an intraventricular catheter every 24 hours were analyzed for the presence of excitatory amino acids ([EAAs] glutamate, aspartate, and glycine) and cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin [IL]-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10). The two groups did not differ significantly in patient age, neurological status, or level of ICP. There were no significant differences in daily changes in CSF concentrations of EAAs and cytokines between the two groups. The incidence of pneumonia was slightly higher in the HT group compared with the NT group (p = 0.059). The incidence of diabetes insipidus associated with hypernatremia was significantly higher in the HT group compared with that in the NT group (p < 0.01). The two groups did not differ with respect to their clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend normothermia therapy for the treatment of severely head injured patients in whom ICP can be maintained at lower than 20 mm Hg by using conventional therapies, because mild hypothermia therapy does not convey any advantage over normothermia therapy in such patients.