Angle of covered self-expandable metallic stents after placement is a risk factor for recurrent biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMS) with a low axial forces after placement can cause early recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) due to precipitating sludge formation. AIM: To ascertain whether the angle of CSEMS after placement is a risk factor for RBO in unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). METHODS: Between January 2010 and March 2019, 261 consecutive patients underwent self-expandable metallic stent insertion by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at our facility, and 87 patients were included in this study. We evaluated the risk factors for RBO, including the angle of CSEMS after placement as the primary outcome. We measured the obtuse angle of CSEMS after placement on an abdominal radiograph using the SYNAPSE PACS system. We also evaluated technical and functional success, adverse events, time to RBO (TRBO), non-RBO rate, survival time, cause of RBO, and reintervention procedure as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: We divided the patients into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of RBO. The angle of CSEMS after placement (per 1° and per 10°) was evaluated using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, which was an independent risk factor for RBO in unresectable distal MBO [hazard ratio, 0.97 and 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-0.99 and 0.54-0.92; P = 0.01 and 0.01, respectively]. For early diagnosis of RBO, the cut-off value of the angle of CSEMS after placement using the receiver operating characteristic curve was 130° [sensitivity, 50.0%; specificity 85.5%; area under the curve 0.70 (95%CI: 0.57-0.84)]. TRBO in the < 130° angle group was significantly shorter than that in the ≥ 130° angle group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the angle of the CSEMS after placement for unresectable distal MBO is a risk factor for RBO. These novel results provide pertinent information for future stent management.

The usefulness of serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytological examination for pancreatic cancer not diagnosed by EUS-FNAB.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) is safe and useful for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, sometimes a diagnosis cannot be established by EUS-FNAB. The efficacy of serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytological examination (SPACE) for pancreatic cancer was reported. SPACE may be useful in cases in which diagnosis by EUS-FNAB is difficult; however, this has not been reported previously. We herein report two cases of pancreatic cancer diagnosed by SPACE when diagnosis by EUS-FNAB was difficult. Case 1 was a 77-year-old female. She was suspected of pancreatic cancer because of new-onset diabetes. We performed EUS-FNAB to the lesion in the pancreatic body; however, diagnosis failed. We performed SPACE and diagnosed pancreatic cancer finally. Case 2 was 72 years old female. She was suspected of having pancreatic cancer because of the dilatation of the pancreatic duct. We performed EUS-FNAB twice to the lesion in the pancreatic head, however, diagnosis failed. Therefore, we performed SPACE and got final diagnosis as pancreatic cancer. From our experience, we suggest that SPACE is a useful diagnostic method for patients with pancreatic cancer that are difficult to diagnose.

Colorectal polyps located across a fold are difficult to resect completely using endoscopic mucosal resection: A propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete polyp resection during colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) might contribute to the development of interval cancer. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to determine the incidence of incomplete polyp resection during EMR of colorectal polyps located across a fold compared with that of colorectal polyps located between folds. METHODS: In total, 262 patients with 262 lesions that were ≥10 mm in diameter and treated with conventional EMR were enrolled. The main outcome was the incidence of incomplete polyp resections. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to reduce the effects of selection bias. RESULTS: Fifty-seven lesions (21.8%) were incompletely resected. After propensity score matching, the lesions located across a fold were at higher risk of incomplete resection than those between folds (26/68, 38.2% vs 7/68, 10.3%; odds ratio (OR): 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61-8.56; p < 0.01). These findings persisted after adjusting for the differences at baseline using the IPTW method (OR: 3.63; 95% CI: 1.72-7.63; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of an incomplete polyp resection for a colorectal polyp that is located across a fold compared with that for a polyp that is located between folds.

Heparin-bridging therapy is associated with post-colorectal polypectomy bleeding in patients whose oral anticoagulation therapy is interrupted.

OBJECTIVES: The American and Japanese Societies for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines recommend heparin-bridging therapy for patients whose oral anticoagulants are interrupted for endoscopic procedures. However, little is known about the potential association between heparin-bridging therapy and post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). The aim was to investigate the incidence of PPB associated with heparin-bridging therapy administered to patients whose anticoagulants were interrupted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using inverse propensity analysis. Between 2013 and 2015, 1004 patients with 2863 lesions were included. The primary outcomes were the rates of PPB and thromboembolism associated with heparin-bridging therapy. The risk factors associated with PPB were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis involving probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: The patients were categorized into a heparin-bridging therapy group (78 patients with 255 lesions) or a control group (926 patients with 2608 lesions). The PPB rate in the heparin-bridging therapy group (10.2%, 8/78) was significantly higher than in the control group (1.1%, 11/926) (p <.01). Thromboembolism occurred in one patient in the control group. The multivariate analysis revealed that heparin-bridging therapy was an independent risk factor associated with PPB (odds ratio [OR], 8.21; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.32-29.10; p <.01). IPTW showed heparin-bridging therapy increased PPB (OR, 7.68; 95% CI, 1.83-32.28; p <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-bridging therapy administered to patients whose oral anticoagulants were interrupted was associated with an increased PPB risk.