Intrapartum ultrasound for fetal head asynclitism: Is it possible to establish a degree of asynclitism to correlate to delivery outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of intrapartum ultrasound (IU) in the diagnosis of asynclitism and the importance of asynclitism degree in labor outcomes. METHOD: This prospective cohort study included 41 low-risk pregnant women with fetus in singleton-vertex. The IU assessment to diagnose asynclitism was performed during labor at two specific steps, including the suspicion and/or diagnosis of labor arrest. The "four-chamber view" and "squint sign without nose" were classified as marked/severe asynclitism. The "midline deviation" and "squint sign with nose" findings were classified as moderate asynclitism. Obstetric outcomes and maternal-fetal complications were compared with the degree of asynclitism. RESULTS: Severe and moderate asynclitism was seen in 17 (41.7%), 10 (58.8%) and seven (41.2%) women, respectively. All pregnant women diagnosed with asynclitism delivered by vacuum extraction (VE) or cesarean section (CS). CS was performed in nine patients with asynclitism (52.9%). The difference between asynclitism type and VE/CS ratios was statistically significant (P = 0.039). Four fetuses with squint sign without nose delivered by VE. A significant correlation was seen between the presence of squint without nose sign and second-/third-degree perineal injury. CONCLUSION: Severe asynclitism is associated with increasing operative birth and maternal-fetal complications. Detection of asynclitism degree by IU could be useful, alerting the obstetrics team to possible perinatal problems during delivery.

[Trial of labour after c-section in 2022: a narrative review of the literature]. / Accouchement vaginal après une césarienne en 2022 : revue narrative de la littérature.

One in three women in Switzerland gives birth by c-section. This high incidence of c-section frequently exposes obstetricians and midwives to the management of women and their deliveries with a scarred uterus. The decision of couples is multifactorial, but the information that will be delivered by their gynaecologist will necessarily influence the delivery route choice. We propose to review the international recommendations and the literature on the subject, to provide the couple and the attending physician with elements of reflection to guide the choice of delivery route or to monitor adequately when attempting vaginal delivery after a caesarean section.

En Suisse, une femme sur trois donne naissance à son enfant par césarienne. Cette forte incidence de la césarienne expose régulièrement les obstétriciens et les sages-femmes à la gestion de femmes et de leur accouchement avec un utérus cicatriciel. La décision des couples est multifactorielle, mais l'information qui sera délivrée par leur gynécologue va nettement influencer le choix de la voie d'accouchement. Nous proposons ici de passer en revue les recommandations internationales et la littérature sur le sujet, afin de procurer les éléments de réflexion au couple et au médecin traitant afin de guider le choix de la voie d'accouchement et de monitorer adéquatement au cours d'une tentative d'accouchement par voie basse.

Preparing an obstetric unit in the heart of the epidemic strike of COVID-19: quick reorganization tips.

COVID-19 is placing considerable strain on healthcare systems. Disaster and military medicine specialists were involved in the outbreak in Italy, after many units were overwhelmed. Health providers were caught off guard and personnel was unprepared to face this unprecedented threat. Local decisions accelerated the rate of the spread. Many countries declared a state of emergency and lockdown to contain the exponential transmission of the disease. The purpose of this review is to suggest quick key points of strategies to implement in obstetric units without delay to respond to the oncoming wave, based on experience and feedback from the field. It is essential in an emergency situation to understand what is at stake and prepare maternity wards in the best possible way.

Near-term pregnant women's attitude toward, concern about and knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: COVID-19 is a novel type of the coronavirus family with an incompletely described clinical course. Little is known about the psychological aspects, particularly for vulnerable populations including pregnant women.Objectives: To understand the attitude, concerns, and knowledge of the non-infected pregnant women toward the COVID-19 outbreak in order to constitute base data for detailed counseling and to develop targeted messages.Patients and methods: This cross-sectional survey research presented analysis of prospectively collected data yielded at a single tertiary "Coronavirus Pandemic Hospital" referral center for a ten days period following the first confirmed death due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Non-infected women with a confirmed pregnancy over 30th gestational week were consecutively included. A patient-reported non-validated questionnaire formed by the expert committee that includes 15 specific questions was used. Non-infected, pregnant women over 30th gestational week who applied to the outpatient clinic were consecutively included. A total of 213 women were enrolled, 37 were excluded: 7 for being in the first trimester, 3 were illiterate, and 27 were Syrian refugees having difficulties in translation.Results: A total of 172 pregnant women were included. Overall, four women refused to participate to the survey (1.9%). The mean age was 27.5 ± 5.3 years. Median gestational week and parity were 35 ± 11 weeks and 1 ± 2, respectively. Pregnant women were observed to trust the authorities (65%) and the healthcare staff (92.4%), and their respect was increased (82.5%) during the outbreak. Majority of the women (87.2%) comply with the self-quarantine rules. Half of the women (52%) reported that they felt vulnerable and predominantly were concerned (80%). Approximately one-third of the women constantly keep thinking that they may get infected (35.5%) or they might get infected during/following the delivery or their baby might get infected after being born (42%). Half of the women (50%) were reported that they either had no idea about or think the breastfeeding is not safe during the outbreak. About 45% of the women were confused or had doubts about if the mode of delivery may be affected by the pandemic. Greater part of the participants does not know if COVID-19 might cause birth defects (76%) or preterm birth (64.5%). Counseling flow keys helping pregnant women to overcome misleads, regarding the COVID-19 outbreak is proposed.Conclusions: Non-infected pregnant women with a viable pregnancy at near term were observed to have positive attitude and compliance toward the COVID-19 outbreak and frontline healthcare staff; increased concern and vulnerability; and restricted knowledge about the pregnancy-related outcomes. While the clinical evidence was growing rapidly, this data may guide obstetricians and midwives to perceive what accurate information should be provided to the pregnant women.

[Evolution of cesarean section rates according to Robson classification in a swiss maternity hospital]. / Evolution du taux de césariennes dans une maternité universitaire suisse selon la classification de Robson.

We conducted a retrospective study was conducted in the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) including all births between the 1st January 1997 and 31st December 2011 to analyze the cesarean section (CS) rate using the different groups of the Robson classification in a Swiss maternity hospital. The overall CS rate was 29 %, mainly related to group 5 (multiparous with previous CS) and group 2 (nulliparous women induced or who had CS before labor). The study also shows that induction of labor on maternal request in nulliparous at term (group 2a) increased significantly the risk of CS compared to induction of labor for medical reason (p<0.001). The Robson classification system appears as a simple tool for monitoring CS rates. The main strategies for reducing CS rates will be through better selection of women for VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean) and limitation of induction of labor, especially in nulliparous women.

Afin d'analyser le taux de césariennes (CS) selon les différents groupes de la classification de Robson dans une maternité universitaire suisse, nous avons mené une étude rétrospective au Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV) incluant les accouchements survenus entre le 1er janvier 1997 et le 31 décembre 2011. Le taux global de CS s'élève à 29 %, principalement dans le groupe 5 (patientes avec antécédents de CS) et le groupe 2 (nullipares à terme provoquées ou ayant une CS élective). L'étude montre également que le déclenchement du travail sur demande maternelle chez la nullipare à terme (groupe 2a) augmente le risque de CS par rapport à une induction médicale (p < 0,001). La classification de Robson apparaît comme un outil simple d'évaluation et de surveillance des taux de CS. Limiter les inductions chez la nullipare et promouvoir la voie basse après CS pourraient constituer un point de départ pour infléchir le taux global de CS.