Cluster randomised trial of the uptake of a take-home infant dose of nevirapine in Kenya.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether a single take home dose of infant nevirapine increased infant uptake without decreasing institutional deliveries. DESIGN: Cluster randomised post-test only study with control group. SETTING: Ten hospitals in urban areas of Coast, Rift Valley, and Western provinces, Kenya. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women with HIV, 18 years and older, and at least 32 weeks gestation recruited during antenatal care and followed up at home approximately one week after delivery. INTERVENTION: In the intervention group, women were given a single infant's dose of nevirapine to take home prior to delivery. In the control group, no changes were made to the standard of care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mothers' reports of infant uptake of nevirapine and place of delivery. RESULTS: Uptake of the infant's nevirapine dose was high, 94% in the intervention group and 88% in the control group (p=0.096). Among women who delivered at home, uptake was higher significantly among infants whose mothers got the take home dose compared to women who did not get the dose (93% vs. 53%, p<0.01). The intervention did not influence place of delivery. Providers were positive about the take home dose concept; difficulties were attributed to HIV-related stigma. CONCLUSIONS: Making take home infant nevirapine available, either as a single dose administered within 72 hours of birth or as part of a more complex six week postnatal regimen, will increase infant uptake especially among women who deliver at home without affecting place of delivery.

[Supporting parents and newborns hospitalized in a NICU: interest of group setting]. / Soutien des parents et des nouveau-nés hospitalisés en néonatologie : intérêt d'un dispositif de groupe.

This article exposes the work realized in a NICU, in a small group of parents and their hospitalized premature or ill newborns. The group has a containing function, regarding the effects of the traumatism that occurs when such babies are born. It allows sharing affects and emotions that are filtered and softened through singing. Actually, the parents themselves propose songs or lullabies. The group process is described regarding parents and babies: close infant observation is an essential part of the process.

A comparison of three daily coital diary designs and a phone-in regimen.

Barrier contraceptive trials and disease intervention studies often utilize coital diaries to measure sexual exposures: dates and frequency of intercourse, product use, additional or alternative contraceptive use, and menstrual bleeding. The validity of these self-reported data is a matter of debate, but if used, better diary designs are sought. We studied 3 different coital diaries, plus a phone-in regimen (none or weekly) in a 3 x 2 factorial design to compare participant ratings and promptness of recording. Our underlying presumption was that ease of and satisfaction with use, and promptness of data collection, are associated with greater accuracy. A self-completed questionnaire at the end of the study collected comparative retrospective data. Diary 1 captured information about a single day on one page and had three columns, for up to three possible acts of intercourse. Diary 2 had the same question format as the first diary, but contained 7 days per page. Diary 3 had 7 days on a page, but instead of a column for each act, participants enumerated the number of acts, the types of contraception used, and condom use details. Half of the women in each diary group phoned in their data weekly. Phone-in improved participants' satisfaction with the diary design as reflected by higher ratings of diary features. Phone-in did not improve recall of data at the end of the study for any of the diaries. There were no differences in the promptness of diary completion. Diaries 1 and 2 showed good concordance with recalled data, and participants expressed a preference for the layout of Diary 2. Women assigned to Diary 3 expressed dissatisfaction with the design and were worse at recalling data at the end of the study, probably due to the complexity of that diary design.

Correlates of cognitive function in middle-aged adults. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators.

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study administered cognitive function tests to more than 14,000 middle-aged adults in 1990-1992. The battery included the Delayed Word Recall test, the Digit Symbol Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, and the Controlled Oral Word Association (Word Fluency) test. Test performance was correlated positively with education level, negatively with age, was better in women than in men, and better in managers/professionals compared with other occupations. After controlling for these factors, race and community, the findings most consistent for both sexes were that Delayed Word Recall was negatively associated with depressive symptoms, diabetes, and fibrinogen level; the Digit Symbol Subtest was associated with marital status, negatively associated with depressive symptoms, smoking status, fibrinogen level, and carotid intima-media thickness, and positively associated with alcohol drinking and FEV1; and the Word Fluency test was positively associated with marital status, alcohol drinking, sports participation, and FEV1. Most of these cross-sectional results were in the predicted direction and have biologic plausibility, but mean differences between extreme categories were small (generally on the order of 0.1 to 0.2 of a standard deviation). Longitudinal study is warranted to evaluate whether small differences in middle-age lead to larger, clinically meaningful deficits with aging.