Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Periodontol ; 46(9): 969-976, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31241784

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the short-term clinical outcomes of lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth roots (TR) and autogenous bone blocks (AB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of n = 23 patients (23 implants) were available for the analysis. Each subject was allocated to lateral ridge augmentation using either (a) healthy autogenous tooth roots (e.g., retained wisdom or impacted teeth; n = 13) or (b) cortical autogenous bone blocks harvested from the retromolar area (n = 10). Clinical parameters (e.g., bleeding on probing-BOP, probing pocket depth-PD, mucosal recession-MR, clinical attachment level-CAL) were recorded at (V8) and after 26 ± 4 weeks (V9) of implant loading. RESULTS: TR and AB groups were associated with comparable (p > 0.05) changes in mean BOP (-23.0 ± 34.3%; -11.75 ± 24.9%), PD (-0.03 ± 0.14 mm; -0.1 ± 0.29 mm), MR (0.0 ± 0.0 mm; 0.0 ± 0.0 mm) and CAL (-0.03 ± 0.14 mm; -0.1 ± 0.29 mm) values. The regression analysis failed to reveal any significant correlations between changes in BOP and PD values and the initial as well as the ridge width measured at 26 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: TR and AB were associated with comparable clinical short-term outcomes.


Assuntos
Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Dente Impactado , Transplante Ósseo , Implantação Dentária Endóssea , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Raiz Dentária
2.
J Clin Periodontol ; 45(8): 996-1004, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29972245

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of autogenous tooth roots (TR) and autogenous bone blocks (AB) for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and two-stage implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 patients in need of implant therapy and lateral ridge augmentation were allocated to parallel groups receiving either (a) healthy autogenous tooth roots (e.g. retained wisdom or impacted teeth) (n = 15) or (b) cortical autogenous bone blocks harvested from the retromolar area. After 26 weeks of submerged healing, the primary endpoint was defined as the crestal ridge width (mm) (CW26) being sufficient to place an adequately dimensioned titanium implant at the respective sites. RESULTS: Soft tissue healing was uneventful in both groups. CW26 at V isit 6 allowed for a successful implant placement in all patients of both TR (15/15) and AB groups (15/15). Mean CW26 values amounted to 10.06 ± 1.85 mm (median: 11.0) in the TR and 9.20 ± 2.09 mm (median: 8.50) in the AB group, respectively. The difference between both groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.241). CONCLUSIONS: TR may serve as an alternative graft to support lateral alveolar ridge augmentation and two-stage implant placement.


Assuntos
Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Implantes Dentários , Transplante Ósseo , Implantação Dentária Endóssea , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Raiz Dentária
3.
J Clin Periodontol ; 45(4): 471-483, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29331021

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the onset, progression and resolution of experimentally induced peri-implant mucositis lesions at abutments with different microstructures in humans. MATERIAL & METHODS: In a randomized, controlled, interventional two-centre study, a total of 28 patients had received 28 target implants and were randomly allocated to either partially microgrooved (test) or machined (control) healing abutments. The study was accomplished in three phases, including a wound healing period (WH) following implant placement (12 weeks), a plaque exposure phase (EP-21 days) and a resolution phase (RP-16 weeks). Clinical (e.g. bleeding on probing-BOP), immunological (MMP-8) and microbiological (DNA counts for 11 species) parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of peri-implant mucositis at EPd21 was comparable in both test and control groups (60.0% versus 61.5%), but markedly lower at control abutments after a nonsurgical treatment and reconstitution of oral hygiene measures at RPw16 (46.7% versus 15.4%). At any follow-up visit (i.e. EP and RP), clinical parameters, MMP-8 levels and DNA counts of major bacterial species were not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSION: The onset, progression and resolution of experimental peri-implant mucositis lesions were comparable in both groups.


Assuntos
Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Peri-Implantite/etiologia , Estomatite/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Dente Suporte/efeitos adversos , Dente Suporte/microbiologia , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metaloproteinase 8 da Matriz/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peri-Implantite/imunologia , Peri-Implantite/microbiologia , Peri-Implantite/fisiopatologia , Estomatite/microbiologia , Estomatite/fisiopatologia , Cicatrização/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...