Sexual and reproductive health needs of young women living with perinatally acquired HIV.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, young women living with perinatally acquired HIV (YWLPaHIV) have transitioned from paediatric to adult services. There remains a paucity of data on the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of YWLPaHIV and their access to youth-friendly care. Amidst healthcare changes due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, we explored SRH needs of a cohort of YWLPaHIV. METHODS: Evaluation of SRH needs of YWLPaHIV attending a UK NHS-youth HIV service with data collected from patient records and self-reported questionnaires amongst women attending between July and November 2020 following easing of the first lockdown and reintroduction of in-person appointments. RESULTS: 71 of 112 YWLPaHIV registered at the clinic completed questionnaires during the study period and were included in the analysis. Median age was 23 y (IQR 21-27, range 18-36). 51/71(72%) reported coitarche, average age 17.6 y (IQR 16-18, range 14-24). 24 women reported 47 pregnancies resulting in 16 (34%) HIV-negative live-births, 19 (40%) terminations, 9(19%) miscarriages, with 3 pregnancies ongoing. 31/48(65%) sexually active women reported current contraception: 10 (32%) condoms, 19 (62%) long-acting, and 3(10%) oral contraceptive pill. 18/51(35%) reported a previous sexually transmitted infection; human papillomavirus (HPV) (11), Chlamydia trachomatis (9) and herpes simplex (2). 27/71(38%) women had undergone cervical cytology including 20/28(71%) women aged ≥25 y with abnormalities documented in 29%. HPV vaccination was reported in 83%, with protective hepatitis B titres in 71%. CONCLUSION: High rates of unplanned pregnancy, STIs and cervical abnormalities highlight the continuing SRH needs of YWLPaHIV and requirement for open access to integrated HIV/SRH services despite pandemic restrictions.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on viral suppression for young adults living with perinatally acquired HIV infection.

We compared virological and immunological outcomes for young adults with perinatally-acquired HIV infection (YAPaHIV) in the year preceding, and year of, UK SARS-CoV-2 lockdown restrictions, in a service that maintained face-to-face appointments. Retrospective single-centre cohort analysis from; Period 1(P1) twelve months before the first national lockdown - 23rd March 2019-23rd March 2020, period 2(P2) twelve months of varied restrictions - 24th March 2020-24th March 2021. Data collected from electronic records included age, ethnicity, sex, HIV viral load (VL) (suppression ≤ 200 copies/ml), CD4 count (cells/µL), clinical events, and appointment frequency/modality. Descriptive analysis was comparative between periods. Of 177 YAPaHIV: 56% were female, 86.9% were black, median age at lockdown 23 years (IQR: 21-27). One individual was lost to follow up and excluded from subsequent analysis. 147/176 (83.5%) had a suppressed VL in P1 compared with 156/176 (88.6%) in P2. Of those detectable, median VL was 3200 copies/ml (IQR: 925-36500) in P1, and 911copies/ml (IQR: 317-52300) in P2. In P1, median CD4 was 675 (IQR: 447-845.25). 32(18%) had a CD4 < 350 (median 216.5 [IQR: 94.25-269.75]). 110 (59.5%) had a CD4 count in P2, median 551.5cells/µL (IQR: 329.25-761.25). Thirty one had CD4 < 350 (median 202 [IQR: 134.5-296]). Maintaining face-to-face appointments for vulnerable patients, with remote consultation for stable patients, maintained high levels of care engagement and suppression in a YAPaHIV cohort despite pandemic restrictions.

Injury scoring systems for blast injuries: a narrative review.

Injury scoring systems can be used for triaging, predicting morbidity and mortality, and prognosis in mass casualty incidents. Recent conflicts and civilian incidents have highlighted the unique nature of blast injuries, exposing deficiencies in current scoring systems. Here, we classify and describe deficiencies with current systems used for blast injury. Although current scoring systems highlight survival trends for populations, there are several major limitations. The reliable prediction of mortality on an individual basis is inaccurate. Other limitations include the saturation effect (where scoring systems are unable to discriminate between high injury score individuals), the effect of the overall injury burden, lack of precision in discriminating between mechanisms of injury, and a lack of data underpinning scoring system coefficients. Other factors influence outcomes, including the level of healthcare and the delay between injury and presentation. We recommend that a new score incorporates the severity of injuries with the mechanism of blast injury. This may include refined or additional codes, severity scores, or both, being added to the Abbreviated Injury Scale for high-frequency, blast-specific injuries; weighting for body regions associated with a higher risk for death; and blast-specific trauma coefficients. Finally, the saturation effect (maximum value) should be removed, which would enable the classification of more severe constellations of injury. An early accurate assessment of blast injury may improve management of mass casualty incidents.