Model-assisted estimation in high-dimensional settings for survey data.

Model-assisted estimators have attracted a lot of attention in the last three decades. These estimators attempt to make an efficient use of auxiliary information available at the estimation stage. A working model linking the survey variable to the auxiliary variables is specified and fitted on the sample data to obtain a set of predictions, which are then incorporated in the estimation procedures. A nice feature of model-assisted procedures is that they maintain important design properties such as consistency and asymptotic unbiasedness irrespective of whether or not the working model is correctly specified. In this article, we examine several model-assisted estimators from a design-based point of view and in a high-dimensional setting, including linear regression and penalized estimators. We conduct an extensive simulation study using data from the Irish Commission for Energy Regulation Smart Metering Project, to assess the performance of several model-assisted estimators in terms of bias and efficiency in this high-dimensional data set.

A unified framework of multiply robust estimation approaches for handling incomplete data.

Missing data occur frequently in practice. Inverse probability weighting and imputation are regarded as two important approaches for handling missing data. However, the validity of these approaches depends on underlying model assumptions. A new general framework for multiply robust estimation procedures by combining multiple nonresponse and imputation models is proposed in the paper. The proposed method can be used to estimate both smooth and non-smooth parameters defined as the solution of some estimating equations. It includes population means, quantiles, and distribution functions as special cases. The asymptotic results of the proposed methods are established. The results of a simulation study and a real data application suggest that the proposed methods perform well in terms of bias and efficiency.

A semiparametric multiply robust multiple imputation method for causal inference.

Evaluating the impact of non-randomized treatment on various health outcomes is difficult in observational studies because of the presence of covariates that may affect both the treatment or exposure received and the outcome of interest. In the present study, we develop a semiparametric multiply robust multiple imputation method for estimating average treatment effects in such studies. Our method combines information from multiple propensity score models and outcome regression models, and is multiply robust in that it produces consistent estimators for the average causal effects if at least one of the models is correctly specified. Our proposed estimators show promising performances even with incorrect models. Compared with existing fully parametric approaches, our proposed method is more robust against model misspecifications. Compared with fully non-parametric approaches, our proposed method does not have the problem of curse of dimensionality and achieves dimension reduction by combining information from multiple models. In addition, it is less sensitive to the extreme propensity score estimates compared with inverse propensity score weighted estimators and augmented estimators. The asymptotic properties of our method are developed and the simulation study shows the advantages of our proposed method compared with some existing methods in terms of balancing efficiency, bias, and coverage probability. Rubin's variance estimation formula can be used for estimating the variance of our proposed estimators. Finally, we apply our method to 2009-2010 National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES) to examine the effect of exposure to perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAs) on kidney function.

A Comparison of Existing Bootstrap Algorithms for Multi-Stage Sampling Designs.

Multi-stage sampling designs are often used in household surveys because a sampling frame of elements may not be available or for cost considerations when data collection involves face-to-face interviews. In this context, variance estimation is a complex task as it relies on the availability of second-order inclusion probabilities at each stage. To cope with this issue, several bootstrap algorithms have been proposed in the literature in the context of a two-stage sampling design. In this paper, we describe some of these algorithms and compare them empirically in terms of bias, stability, and coverage probability.

Multiply Robust Bootstrap Variance Estimation in the Presence of Singly Imputed Survey Data.

Item nonresponse in surveys is usually dealt with through single imputation. It is well known that treating the imputed values as if they were observed values may lead to serious underestimation of the variance of point estimators. In this article, we propose three pseudo-population bootstrap schemes for estimating the variance of imputed estimators obtained after applying a multiply robust imputation procedure. The proposed procedures can handle large sampling fractions and enjoy the multiple robustness property. Results from a simulation study suggest that the proposed methods perform well in terms of relative bias and coverage probability, for both population totals and quantiles.

A note on multiply robust predictive mean matching imputation with complex survey data.

Predictive mean matching is a commonly used imputation procedure for addressing the problem of item nonrespone in surveys. The customary approach relies upon the specification of a single outcome regression model. In this note, we propose a novel predictive mean matching procedure that allows the user to specify multiple outcome regression models. The resulting estimator is multiply robust in the sense that it remains consistent if one of the specified outcome regression models is correctly specified. The results from a simulation study suggest that the proposed method performs well in terms of bias and efficiency.

Jackknife empirical likelihood method for multiply robust estimation with missing data.

A novel jackknife empirical likelihood method for constructing confidence intervals for multiply robust estimators is proposed in the context of missing data. Under mild regularity conditions, the proposed jackknife empirical likelihood ratio has been shown to converge to a standard chi-square distribution. A simulation study supports the findings and shows the benefits of the proposed method. The latter has also been applied to 2016 National Health Interview Survey data.

Multiply robust imputation procedures for zero-inflated distributions in surveys.

Item nonresponse in surveys is usually treated by some form of single imputation. In practice, the survey variable subject to missing values may exhibit a large number of zero-valued observations. In this paper, we propose multiply robust imputation procedures for treating this type of variable. Our procedures may be based on multiple imputation models and/or multiple nonresponse models. An imputation procedure is said to be multiply robust if the resulting estimator is consistent when all models but one are misspecified. The variance of the imputed estimators is estimated through a generalized jackknife variance estimation procedure. Results from a simulation study suggest that the proposed procedures perform well in terms of bias, efficiency and coverage rate.