Hematological toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer: a network meta-analysis and pharmacovigilance study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate and compare the risk of hematological adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Food and Drug Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for RCTs related to abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the risks of hematological AEs, and a disproportionality analysis was performed to detect signals of hematological AEs. RESULTS: 16 RCTs comprising 16,350 breast cancer patients were included. Palbociclib and ribociclib had similar risks for hematological AEs, except a higher risk of grade 3-4 leukopenia observed with palbociclib (risk ratio [RR]: 7.84, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.33-41.28). Abemaciclib had a higher risk of anemia than both ribociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.25 - 3.96; grade 3-4: RR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.59 - 8.11) and palbociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.03 - 2.59), but a lower risk of grade 3-4 of both leukopenia (RR: 0.12, 95%CI: 0.02 - 0.49) and neutropenia (RR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04 - 0.52) compared with palbociclib. Signals indicating occurrence of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were identified for three CDK4/6 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib showed significant but inconsistent hematological toxicity risks.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced or metastatic OSCC over a 10-year lifetime horizon from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Costs and utilities were derived from the drug procurement platform and published literature. The model outcomes comprised of costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to address uncertainty and ensure the robustness of the model. RESULTS: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy yielded an additional 0.337 QALYs and incremental costs of $7,117.007 compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, generating an ICER of $21,116.75 per QALY, which was between 1 time ($12,674.89/QALY) and 3 times GDP ($38,024.67/QALY) per capita. In one-way sensitivity analysis, the ICER is most affected by the cost of oxaliplatin, paclitaxel and tislelizumab. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, when the willingness-to-pay threshold was set as 1 or 3 times GDP per capita, the probability of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy being cost-effective was 1% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was probably cost-effective compared with chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic OSCC in China.

Evaluation of omadacycline regimens for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients infected with Staphylococcus Aureus by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.

Omadacycline is an FDA-approved agent for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of omadacycline for treating CABP patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus, including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were performed by utilizing omadacycline pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data, and in vivo PK/PD targets to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) values for different dose regimens against MRSA and MSSA in CABP patients. A dosage regimen with a PTA or CFR expectation value greater than 90% was considered optimal. For all recommended dose regimens, PTA values for MRSA MIC ≤1 and MSSA MIC ≤4 on days 1, 4, and 7 were greater than 90%. Based on the MIC distribution of Staphylococcus aureus, all dose regimens had CFR values greater than 90% for both MRSA and MSSA. CFR values for different bacterial strains were still greater than 90% within the range of PK/PD target values less than 40, although they gradually decreased with increasing PK/PD target values. PK/PD modeling demonstrated that all recommended dose regimens of omadacycline are highly effective against CABP patients infected with MRSA and MSSA. The study provides theoretical support for the efficacy of omadacycline in different dose regimens.

Population pharmacokinetics and toxicity correlation analysis of free and liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in Chinese female patients with advanced breast cancer by constructing population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models of liposome-encapsulated and free doxorubicin. Additionally, the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and drug-related adverse events (AEs) was explored through toxicity correlation analysis. METHODS: A total of 20 patients with advanced breast cancer were selected from a PLD bioequivalence study. All patients received a single intravenous dose of 50 mg/m2 PLD. Plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A popPK model was simultaneously built to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of liposome-encapsulated and free doxorubicin by non-linear mixed effects model (NONMEM). PLD-related toxicities were graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0. The Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and drug-related AEs of both liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and free doxorubicin. RESULTS: The concentration-time profiles of both liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and free doxorubicin were well described by a one-compartment model. The most common AEs to PLD were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, leukopenia, and stomatitis, most of which were grade I-II. The toxicity correlation analysis results indicated that stomatitis was related to the Cmax of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (P < 0.05). No other AEs were found to be correlated with the pharmacokinetic parameters of either free or liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin. CONCLUSION: A one-compartment model adequately described the popPK characteristics of both liposome-encapsulated and free doxorubicin in Chinese female patients with advanced breast cancer. Most AEs to PLD were mild. Additionally, the occurrence of mucositis may be positively correlated with the Cmax of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin.

Reply to "A better interpretation of data regarding the opioid switching to methadone".

In our article ?Methadone switching for refractory cancer pain' (BMC palliative care, 2022) we explore the efficacy, safety and economics of methadone in treatment of patients with refractory cancer pain in China. Professor Mercadante provided a better interpretation of data regarding the opioid switching to methadone in the Matters Arising. In this article, we answered the questions in Mercadante et al.'s comments one by one.

A Prognostic Cuproptosis-Related LncRNA Signature for Colon Adenocarcinoma.

Background: Cuproptosis, a recently discovered form of cell death, is caused by copper levels exceeding homeostasis thresholds. Although Cu has a potential role in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), its role in the development of COAD remains unclear. Methods: In this study, 426 patients with COAD were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The Pearson correlation algorithm was used to identify cuproptosis-related lncRNAs. Using the univariate Cox regression analysis, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to select cuproptosis-related lncRNAs associated with COAD overall survival (OS). A risk model was established based on the multivariate Cox regression analysis. A nomogram model was used to evaluate the prognostic signature based on the risk model. Finally, mutational burden and sensitivity analyses of chemotherapy drugs were performed for COAD patients in the low- and high-risk groups. Result: Ten cuproptosis-related lncRNAs were identified and a novel risk model was constructed. A signature based on ten cuproptosis-related lncRNAs was an independent prognostic predictor for COAD. Mutational burden analysis suggested that patients with high-risk scores had higher mutation frequency and shorter survival. Conclusion: Constructing a risk model based on the ten cuproptosis-related lncRNAs could accurately predict the prognosis of COAD patients, providing a fresh perspective for future research on COAD.

Cost-effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in malignancies: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) have become a mainstay for the treatment of BRCA-mutant malignancies. PARPis are likely to be more effective but also bring an increase in costs. Thus, we aimed at evaluating the cost effectiveness of PARPis in the treatment of malignancies. METHODS: Studies of cost effectiveness of PARPis were searched from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Key information was extracted from the identified studies and reviewed. Quality of the included studies was evaluated using Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. Modeling techniques, measurement of parameters and uncertainty analysis were analyzed across studies. Interventions and cost-effectiveness results were reported stratified by patient population. RESULTS: Among the 25 studies identified, we included 17 on ovarian cancer, 2 on breast cancer, 3 on pancreatic cancer, and 3 on prostate cancer that involved olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib. All studies had a QHES score of above 75. In the maintenance therapy of ovarian cancer, additional administration of olaparib was cost-effective for newly diagnosed patients after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy but was not cost-effective for platinum-sensitive recurrent patients in majority studies. However, the economic value of other PARPis in ovarian cancer as well as all PARPis in other tumors remained controversial. Cost-effectiveness of PARPi was primarily impacted by the costs of PARPi, survival time, health utility and discount rate. Moreover, genetic testing improved the cost-effectiveness of PARPi treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PARPi is potentially cost-effective for patients with ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer. Genetic testing can improve the cost-effectiveness of PARPi.

Methadone switching for refractory cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Methadone is commonly considered an alternative opioid treatment for refractory cancer pain. This study aims to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost of methadone in the treatment of refractory cancer pain. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in patients who used methadone for refractory cancer pain from April 2016 to December 2020 at a cancer specialized hospital. Pain control, evaluated via pain score and breakthrough pain frequency, and adverse events of methadone were compared with analgesic regimens prior to methadone administration. The factors potentially affecting the switching outcome were analyzed via multivariate analysis. Moreover, the cost of pain control was estimated. RESULTS: Ninety patients received methadone for poor pain control (74.4%), intolerable adverse events (10.0%), or both (15.6%) after prior opioid treatments. Sixty-four patients (71.1%) were successfully switched to methadone with median pain score significantly decreased from 4.0 to 2.0 (p < 0.001) and median daily frequency of breakthrough pain from 3.0 to 0.0 (p < 0.001) at a maintained median conversion ratio of 6.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 4.0-10.0] to prior opioid treatment. Similar adverse event profiles of constipation, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness were observed between methadone and prior opioid regimens. The median daily cost of analgesic regimens was significantly reduced from $19.5 (IQR: 12.3-46.2) to $10.8 (IQR: 7.1-18.7) (p < 0.01) after switching to methadone. The 3-day switch method significantly improved the rate of successful switching compared with the stop and go method (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% CI: 1.30-8.76, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Methadone is an effective, safe, and cost-saving treatment for patients with refractory cancer pain.