Changes to objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) at Australian medical schools in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) are used to assess clinical skills. We investigated how exit OSCEs changed in Australian medical schools in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lead ACCLAiM assessment academic from 12 eligible Australian medical school members of the Australian Collaboration for Clinical Assessment in Medicine (ACCLAiM) received a 45-item semi-structured online questionnaire. RESULTS: All schools (12/12) responded. Exit OSCEs were not used by one school in 2019, and 3/11 schools in 2020. Of eight remaining schools, four reduced station numbers and testing time. The minimum OSCE testing time decreased from 64 min in 2019 to 54 min in 2020. Other modifications included: a completely online 'e-OSCE' (n = 1); hybrid delivery (n = 4); stations using: videos of patient encounters (n = 3), telephone calls (n = 2), skill completion without face-to-face patient encounters (n = 3). The proportion of stations involving physical examination reduced from 33% to 17%. Fewer examiners were required, and university faculty staff formed a higher proportion of examiners. CONCLUSIONS: All schools changed their OSCEs in 2020 in response to COVID-19. Modifications varied from reducing station numbers and changing delivery methods to removing OSCE and complete assessment re-structuring. Several innovative methods of OSCE delivery were implemented to preserve OSCE validity and reliability whilst balancing feasibility.

Frontal fibrosing alopecia: survey of severity assessment methods in routine clinical practice and validation of the International Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Cooperative Group measurement guidance.

BACKGROUND: The lack of validated and responsive outcome measures in the management of frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) significantly limits assessment of disease progression and treatment response over time. AIM: To understand how FFA extent and progression is currently assessed in UK specialist centres, to validate components of the International FFA Cooperative Group (IFFACG) statement on FFA assessment, and to identify pragmatic advice to improve FFA management in clinic. METHODS: Consultant dermatologists with a specialist interest in hair loss (n = 17) were invited to take part. Preferred FFA assessment methods were explored using questionnaires and clinical scenarios. Participants were asked to identify and mark the current hairline in 10 frontal and 10 temporal hairline images (Questionnaire 1), with assessment repeated 3 months later to assess intraindividual variability (Questionnaire 2) and 12 months later to test whether interindividual accuracy could be improved with simple instruction (Questionnaire 3). RESULTS: All 17 clinicians (100%) completed the questionnaire at each time interval. We identified a wide variation in assessment techniques used by our experts. Measurements were perceived as the most accurate method of assessing frontal recession whereas photography was preferred for temporal recession. Inter-rater reliability between clinicians measuring the frontal hairline scenarios indicated a moderate strength of agreement [intraclass coefficient (ICC) = 0.61; 95% CI 0.40-0.85], yet intrarater reliability was found to be poor with wide limits of agreement (-8.71 mm to 9.92 mm) on follow-up. Importantly, when clear guidance was provided on how the hairline should be identified (Questionnaire 3), inter-rater reliability improved significantly, with ICC = 0.70, suggesting moderate agreement (95% CI 0.51-0.89; P < 0.001). A similar pattern was seen with temporal hairline measurements, which again improved in accuracy with instruction. CONCLUSION: We found that accuracy of measurements in FFA can be improved with simple instruction and we have validated components of the IFFACG measurement recommendations.

Temperature response to cold challenge and mobile phone thermography as outcome measures for systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud's phenomenon.

Objectives: Objective outcome measures of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) are badly needed. Our objectives were to validate the thermographic response to a standard hand cold challenge as an outcome measure by assessing sensitivity to change, and to explore mobile phone thermography as a feasible, ambulatory tool.Method: Twelve patients with an SSc-spectrum disorder admitted for intravenous iloprost infusions underwent a standard cold challenge before and after one infusion. Thermographic measurements included area under the rewarming curve (AUC) and maximum rewarming temperature (MAX). Before and during another infusion, each patient underwent monitoring of finger skin temperature by two methods: continuous thermocouple recording (standard method) and mobile phone thermography.Results: All cold challenge summary measures, including AUC and MAX, increased after iloprost (most not significantly). However, when the response curves were modelled after averaging across fingers (linear mixed models, three versions), significant change was detected. For example, with Model 1 (no interaction between period and time), temperature was on average 1.67ºC [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-1.85, p < 0.001] higher post-iloprost. Mobile phone and thermocouple temperature measurements showed a strong estimated latent correlation (0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.92). The estimated increases/hour were 0.25ºC (95% CI 0.05-0.45) for the thermocouple and 0.36ºC (95% CI 0.13-0.60) for mobile phone thermography.Conclusion: Our pilot study suggests that the thermographic response to a cold challenge is sensitive to change and mobile phone thermography could bring feasibility to thermographic parameters as outcome measures in later-phase, large-scale, community-based clinical trials of RP.

Impact and associates of digital pitting in patients with systemic sclerosis: a pilot study.

Objective: Despite being a cardinal clinical sign of systemic sclerosis (SSc), digital pitting has been little studied. Our objective was to test, in a pilot study, the hypothesis that pitting is painful and associated with digital vascular disease severity.Method: Fifty patients with SSc were recruited: 25 with and 25 without digital pitting. Fingertip pain was assessed on a 0-10 scale. Thermography of both hands assessed surface temperature, allowing calculation of the distal-dorsal difference (temperature gradient) for each finger. Nailfold capillaroscopy was performed in each finger using a dermatoscope, and graded on a 0-3 scale (0 = normal; 3 = grossly abnormal).Results: In the 25 patients with digital pitting, 65 fingers in total were affected (mainly the index and middle fingers). Pain scores were higher in 'pitting' patients [median 4 (interquartile range 3-8) vs 0 (0-2), p < 0.001], and pitting patients reported that pitting impacted on activities of everyday living. Temperature gradients along the fingers did not differ significantly between patients with and without pitting (p = 0.248). Pitting patients were more likely to have 'grossly abnormal' capillaries than those without pitting, and less likely to have 'no/mild' nailfold capillary changes.Conclusions: Digital pitting is painful and impacts on hand function. Capillaroscopy findings provide further support for an association between pitting and severity of digital vascular change. Larger, more comprehensive studies are required to examine the pathophysiology of pitting and to pave the way to therapeutic intervention, ideally including preventive strategies.

Meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials of topical antibiotics after primary closure for the prevention of surgical-site infection.

BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infections (SSIs) increase patient morbidity and costs. The aim was to identify and synthesize all RCTs evaluating the effect of topical antibiotics on SSI in wounds healing by primary intention. METHODS: The search included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the Cochrane Wounds Specialized Register, Central Register of Controlled Trials and EBSCO CINAHL from inception to May 2016. There was no restriction of language, date or setting. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. When sufficient numbers of comparable trials were available, data were pooled in meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 6466 participants met the inclusion criteria. Pooling of eight trials (5427 participants) showed that topical antibiotics probably reduced the risk of SSI compared with no topical antibiotic (risk ratio (RR) 0·61, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 0·87; moderate-quality evidence), equating to 20 fewer SSIs per 1000 patients treated. Pooling of three trials (3012 participants) for risk of allergic contact dermatitis found no clear difference between antibiotics and no antibiotic (RR 3·94, 0·46 to 34·00; very low-quality evidence). Pooling of five trials (1299 participants) indicated that topical antibiotics probably reduce the risk of SSI compared with topical antiseptics (RR 0·49, 0·30 to 0·80; moderate-quality evidence); 43 fewer SSIs per 1000 patients treated. Pooling of two trials (541 participants) showed no clear difference in the risk of allergic contact dermatitis with antibiotics or antiseptic agents (RR 0·97, 0·52 to 1·82; very low-quality evidence). CONCLUSION: Topical antibiotics probably prevent SSI compared with no topical antibiotic or antiseptic. No conclusion can be drawn regarding whether they cause allergic contact dermatitis.

The effect of whole-brain radiation (WBI) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) on survival of patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for second brain metastatic event.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to analyze prognostic factors affecting survival of patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for second brain metastatic event (SBME) following initial treatment with whole brain irradiation (WBI), surgical resection, or previous SRS. METHODS: The 88 patients treated with SRS for SBME at Philadelphia CyberKnife between January 2006 and October 2013 were included in the study group. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors that significantly impacted survival from the time of SRS for SBME. Independent variables considered in survival analysis included primary disease, first brain metastatic event (FBME) treatment type, age, gender, number of brain metastases at SBME, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), and presence of extracranial metastasis. RESULTS: The median survival for all patients was 7.31 months. Log-rank comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed significant impact by Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.003), RPA class (p = 0.008), age (p = 0.014), and FBME treatment type (p = 0.010). Median survival was longer for patients who had not previously received WBI (14.7 months). Median survival was further increased in patients who had not received previous WBI and demonstrated KPS scores of 70-100 (19.5 months). Patients who received WBI prior to SBME treatment experienced a pronounced decrement in median survival (5.7 months), yet patients in this group who demonstrated strong KPS scores (80-100) experienced significantly increased survival (15.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of SRS for SBME are most favorable for patients who have not received previous WBI or who have maintained higher performance status despite previous WBI.

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing aqueous with alcoholic chlorhexidine antisepsis for the prevention of superficial surgical site infection after minor surgery in general practice: the AVALANCHE trial.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection (SSI) after minor skin excisions has a significant impact on patient morbidity and healthcare resources. Skin antisepsis prior to surgical incision is used to prevent SSI, and is performed routinely worldwide. However, in spite of the routine use of skin antisepsis, there is no consensus regarding which antiseptic agents are most effective. The AVALANCHE trial will compare Aqueous Versus Alcoholic Antisepsis with Chlorhexidine for Skin Excisions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study design is a prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) with the aim of investigating the impact of two different antiseptic preparations on the incidence of superficial SSI in patients undergoing minor skin excisions. The intervention of 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in 70% alcohol will be compared with that of 0.5% CHG in aqueous solution. The trial will be conducted in four Australian general practices over a 9-month period, with 920 participants to be recruited. Consecutive patients presenting for minor skin excisions will be eligible to participate. Randomisation will be on the level of the patient. The primary outcome is superficial SSI in the first 30 days following the excision. Secondary outcomes will be adverse effects, including anaphylaxis, skin irritation, contact dermatitis and rash and patterns of antibiotic resistance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the James Cook University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). Findings will be disseminated in conference presentations and journals and through online electronic media. DISCUSSION: RCTs conducted in general practice differ from hospital-based projects in terms of feasibility, pragmatism and funding. The success of this trial will be cemented in the fact that the research question was established by a group of general practitioners who identified an interesting question which is relevant to their clinical practice and not answered by current evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615001045505; Pre-results.

Paediatric Perianesthesia questionnaire: development and data from eight hospitals across Germany.

BACKGROUND: Opinions about satisfaction with care are rarely obtained from children and few studies of this type exist in the area of paediatric anaesthesia. In this study, we developed a comprehensive self-administered questionnaire to measure the level of paediatric and, as a substitute in younger children, parental satisfaction with anaesthesia. In addition, we aimed to identify factors influencing satisfaction and compare results between hospitals. METHODS: We followed a rigorous protocol including construction of a pilot questionnaire and qualitative and quantitative analysis. The questionnaire was adapted for confounding variables. We analysed satisfied and dissatisfied groups and compared satisfaction scores between participating hospitals. RESULTS: A questionnaire was developed which comprised 37 questions assessed on a five-point Likert scale. With a response rate of 71%, a total of 1052 patients completed the questionnaire. In the final analysis, 760 questionnaires (72%) were included. Most questionnaires were answered by the parents [705 (92.8%)]. The mean age of children was 6.7 (4.97) yr. Multivariate analysis found a history of previous anaesthetic problems and the identity of the person answering the questionnaire as influencing factors on the sum score. The most important differences between satisfied and dissatisfied children were found for the dimensions 'privacy and waiting', 'information giving', and 'discomfort'. Scores differed between hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our psychometric questionnaire provides a novel approach to paediatric patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care and covers areas deemed important by children, parents, and carers. Significant differences between satisfied and dissatisfied groups and between participating hospitals were found.

The Anesthesia Preoperative Evaluation Clinic (APEC): a prospective randomized controlled trial assessing impact on consultation time, direct costs, patient education and satisfaction with anesthesia care.

AIM: Anesthetic preoperative evaluation clinics (APECs) are relatively new institutions. Although cost effective, APECs have not been universally adopted in Europe. The aim of this study was to compare preoperative anesthetic assessment in wards with an APEC, assessing time, information gain, patient satisfaction and secondary costs. METHODS: Two hundred and seven inpatients were randomized to be assessed at the APEC or on the ward by the same two senior anesthetists. The outcomes measured were the length of time for each consultation, the amount of information passed on to patients and the level of patient satisfaction. The consultation time was used to calculate impact on direct costs. A multivariate analysis was conducted to detect confounding variables. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were seen in the APEC, and 78 were seen on the ward. The total time for the consultation was shorter for the APEC (mean 8.4 minutes [P<0.01]), and we calculated savings of 6.4 Euro per patient. More information was passed on to the patients seen in the APEC (P<0.01). The general satisfaction scores were comparable between groups. A multivariate analysis found that the consultation time was significantly influenced by the type of anesthesia, the magnitude of the operation and the location of the consultation. Gain in information was significantly influenced by age, education and the location of the visit. CONCLUSION: The APEC reduced consultation times and costs and had a positive impact on patient education. The cost savings are related to personnel costs and, therefore, are independent of other potential savings of an APEC, whereas global patient satisfaction remains unaltered.

Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of skin lesions.

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is an increasing problem in fair-skinned populations worldwide. It is important that doctors are able to diagnose skin lesions accurately. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical with the histological diagnosis of excised skin lesions from a set of epidemiological data. We analysed diagnostic accuracy stratified by histological subtype and body site and examined the histological nature of misclassified diagnosis. METHODS: All excised and histologically confirmed skin cancers in Townsville/Thuringowa, Australia from December 1996 to October 1999 were recorded. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and sensitivities were calculated for the clinical diagnoses and stratified by histological subtype and body site. RESULTS: Skin excisions in 8694 patients were examined. PPVs for the clinical diagnoses were: basal cell carcinoma (BCC) 72.7%; squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) 49.4%; cutaneous melanoma (CM) 33.3%. Sensitivities for the clinical diagnosis were: BCC 63.9%; SCC 41.1%; CM 33.8%. For BCC, PPVs and sensitivities were higher for the trunk, the shoulders and the face and lower for the extremities. The reverse pattern was seen for SCCs. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic accuracy was highest for BCC, the most prevalent lesion. Most excisions were correctly diagnosed or resulted in the removal of malignant lesions. With nonmelanocytic lesions, doctors tended to misclassify benign lesions as malignant, but were less likely to do the reverse. Although a small number of clinically diagnosed common naevi subsequently proved to be melanoma (6.3%), a higher proportion of all melanomas had been classified as common naevi (20.9%). Accuracy of diagnosis was dependent on body site.

Use of adrenaline and atropine in neonatal resuscitation.

One hundred and five infants treated with adrenaline or atropine, or both, as part of resuscitation on 124 occasions were studied retrospectively. Adrenaline was administered to 98 infants, in 40 of whom it was in combination with atropine, and seven infants received atropine alone. Twenty infants were treated solely on the delivery unit, 81 on the neonatal medical unit, and four in both places. Twelve infants treated on the delivery unit and 13 treated on the neonatal unit survived. Follow up studies showed that 13 infants were handicapped with nine severely handicapped. Extreme prematurity, the need for early or repeated resuscitation using these drugs, particularly for episodes of collapse without a clear precipitating cause, and asystole rather than bradycardia were associated with a worse outcome. Evidence is accumulating to support a view that the use of these drugs for resuscitation at birth and in the first week of life of extremely preterm infants may be inappropriate.