Utility of Lille Score in Predicting 30-Day Survival in Steroid-Treated Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), the Lille score is used to assess futility of steroids. However, the ability of the Lille score to predict 30-day survival in AH is not well-defined. Our aim is to compare the utility of the Lille score in predicting 30-day survival in those with AH treated with steroids. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 882 patients hospitalized with AH from January 1st, 2012 through December 30th, 2019 was performed. Of these, 201 patients with severe AH met the threshold to receive steroids. Those with data to calculate Lille score < 0.45 on day 4 (n = 29) or 7 (n = 89) who continued steroids were compared to 83 patients with Lille scores ≥ 0.45 on day 4 (n = 18) or 7 (n = 65) who stopped steroids. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. For comparison, a contemporaneous matched control group was also analyzed of 110 patients who were hospitalized with severe AH, but did not receive steroids. RESULTS: In patients with Lille score < 0.45, survival was higher at 30-day when compared to those with Lille score ≥ 0.45 (94.9% vs. 80.72%; p = 0.002). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Lille score (< 0.45) to predict 30-day survival was 95%, 19%, 63%, and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In severe AH, those with Lille score < 0.45 at day 4 or 7 have improved 30-day survival compared to those with Lille score ≥ 0.45. In those receiving steroids, Lille score has excellent sensitivity to predict 30-day survival but poor specificity.

Incidence and Costs of Clinically Significant Events with Systemic Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic therapies have been associated with clinically significant events (CSEs) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We evaluated the incidence of CSEs (bleeding, clotting, encephalopathy, and portal hypertension), and their impact on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs, in patients with uHCC treated with first-line (1L) atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B), lenvatinib (LEN), or sorafenib (SOR) in the USA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using medical/pharmacy claims from Optum® Clinformatics® Data Mart. Patients diagnosed with HCC who initiated 1L A + B between June 01, 2020 and December 31, 2020 or LEN/SOR between January 01, 2016 and May 31, 2020 were included. Outcomes included incidence rates of CSEs, HCRU, and costs. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients with no CSEs or ≥ 1 CSE. RESULTS: In total, 1379 patients were selected (A + B, n = 271; LEN, n = 217; SOR, n = 891). Clotting (incidence rate per 100 patient-years [PY] 94.9) and bleeding (88.1 per 100 PY) were the most common CSEs in the A + B cohort. The most common CSEs in the LEN cohort were clotting (78.6 per 100 PY) and encephalopathy (66.3 per 100 PY). Encephalopathy (73.0 per 100 PY) and portal hypertension (72.3 per 100 PY) were the most common CSEs in the SOR cohort. Mean total all-cause healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) were $32,742, $35,623, and $29,173 in the A + B, LEN, and SOR cohorts, respectively. Mean total all-cause healthcare costs PPPM were higher in patients who had ≥ 1 CSE versus those who did not (A + B $34,304 versus $30,889; LEN $39,591 versus $30,621; SOR $31,022 versus $27,003). CONCLUSION: Despite improved efficacy of 1L systemic therapies, CSEs remain a concern for patients with uHCC, as well as an economic burden to the healthcare system. Newer treatments that reduce the risk of CSEs, while improving long-term survival in patients with uHCC, are warranted.

Certain treatments for liver cancer can cause serious side effects, including bleeding, blood clots, brain injury (encephalopathy), or increased blood flow to the liver (portal hypertension). We used an insurance database to find out how often these events, known as clinically significant events, occurred in people with liver cancer who were given treatments that target the immune system (immunotherapy) or specific proteins involved in cancer growth and survival (targeted therapy). The study included 1379 patients treated with atezolizumab (immunotherapy) plus bevacizumab (targeted therapy), or lenvatinib or sorafenib alone (both targeted therapies), as their first treatment. Clotting and bleeding were the most common clinically significant events in patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, whereas clotting and encephalopathy were the most common clinically significant events with lenvatinib, and encephalopathy and portal hypertension were the most common clinically significant events with sorafenib. On average, for every 100 patients treated for 1 year, there were more than 50 of each of these events. Average healthcare costs per patient per month ranged from around $29,000 to around $36,000 in the three different treatment groups, and were higher in people who had at least one clinically significant event. These results suggest that clinically significant events are common in people with liver cancer who are given various types of treatment. As well as raising concerns for patient safety, these events result in higher costs to healthcare systems. Therefore, newer treatments that are less likely to cause clinically significant events, while improving survival in patients with liver cancer, are needed.

Outnumbered: Control Prothrombin Time in Maddrey's Discriminant Function Impacts Steroid Use but Not Mortality in Alcoholic Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In alcoholic hepatitis (AH), increases in the total bilirubin (TB) and the prothrombin time (PT), which are included in the Maddrey's discriminant function (MDF) and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), are associated with poor outcomes. However, the impact of which control PT in the MDF to use compared to the MELD on the outcomes in AH is unknown. Our aim is to determine whether the choice of the control PT used in the MDF calculations has any impact on steroid use and survival when compared to the MELD in those with AH. METHODS: Through retrospective chart review, we analyzed 882 subjects who were admitted from 2012 to 2020 with acute AH. Their MDF was calculated [(TB + 4.6 × (PT-control)] using the following three different control PTs: 12, 13.5, and 14.8 s, and was compared to the MELD. The primary outcomes were steroid use and 30-day survival. RESULTS: When it was stratified by the control PT, the percentage of MDF ≥ 32 (the threshold for steroids) decreased with increasing control PT (70%, 61%, and 52%, respectively), along with decreased steroid use (91%, 84%, and 75%, respectively). Those who received steroids were not shown to have improved 30-day survival compared to those who did not receive steroids (p = 0.41). The ability of the MDF for each control PT threshold to predict 30-day survival was similar (AUROC 0.735), and was lower compared to the MELD (0.767). CONCLUSION: While the choice of PT control in the MDF impacted the use of steroids in AH, the use of steroids and the choice of PT control used did not impact the overall survival. Regardless of which control PT was used in the MDF, the MELD was better at predicting 30-day survival. Important information: Background: Treatment with steroids is indicated in alcoholic hepatitis (AH) with Maddrey discriminant function (MDF) ≥ 32 and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) ≥ 20. The impact that the control prothrombin time (PT) value that is used in MDF has on steroid use and survival in AH is poorly understood. FINDINGS: The choice of control PT that is used when calculating the MDF impacts the use of steroids but does not impact mortality. The MELD was better than the MDF at any control PT used in predicting survival in acute AH. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Providers should be aware that higher control PT's have an effect on treatment decisions but should not generally impact survival in this population. The MELD appears to better predict 30-day survival in this population.

Real-World Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Utilization, Costs, and Mortality Among People with Biliary Tract Cancers in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: People with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have a 5-year survival of approximately 2% in the USA. Most cases are inoperable or require systemic treatment following surgery. This study adds to current literature by describing treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and mortality among people with BTCs. METHODS: Adults diagnosed with BTCs were identified in the Merative MarketScan administrative claims databases from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2020. Descriptive analysis was used to measure treatment patterns (i.e., regimen types, therapy duration) during three lines of therapy (LOT). All-cause and disease-related HCRU and costs were measured per-patient-per-month (PPPM) during the entire follow-up and in each LOT. Mortality was reported among the subset linked to the National Death Index (NDI). RESULTS: There were 2648 eligible people with BTCs [mean age 64.0 (standard deviation [SD] 12.4) years, 51.5% female, average follow-up 11.9 (SD 11.1) months]. Treatment was received by 56.3% (n = 1490), and 20.9% (n = 5534) and 7.1% (n = 187) moved on to a second and third LOT, respectively. The average treatment duration decreased across LOTs, from 3.8 (SD 3.1) months in LOT1 to 2.6 (SD 2.4) months in LOT3. Gemcitabine + cisplatin was the most common regimen in LOT1 (44.6%). Total all-cause mean healthcare costs PPPM increased after LOT1 (mean $21,517, $29,721, and $28,557, for LOT1, LOT2, and LOT3, respectively) and the majority (71.2%) were related to BTCs. Of people with BTCs linked to the NDI (n = 2168), 66.1% died and average time to death was 11.3 (SD 11.2) months. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, showing a high rate of mortality, a decrease in treatment duration, and an increase in costs as people progress after LOT1, add recent data to current literature highlighting the unmet need for more effective treatment options for people with BTCs.

Use of doppler ultrasound to predict need for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt revision.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used to treat complications of portal hypertension, such as ascites and variceal bleeding (VB). While liver doppler ultrasound (DUS) is used to assess TIPS patency, trans-shunt venography (TSV) is the gold standard. AIM: To determine the accuracy of DUS to assess TIPS dysfunction and for need for revision. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients referred for TIPS revision from 2008-2021. Demographics, DUS parameters at baseline and at the DUS preceding TIPS revision, TSV data were collected. Receiver operating characteristics curves, sensitivity, specificity, performance for doppler to predict need for revision were performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to predict clinical factors associated with need for TIPS revision. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 89 patients with cirrhosis (64% men, 76% white, 31% alcohol as etiology); median age 59 years. Indication for initial TIPS were VB (41%), refractory ascites (51%), and other (8%). TIPS was revised in 44%. On univariate analysis, factors associated with need for TIPS revision were male (P = 0.03), initial indication for TIPS (P = 0.05) and indication for revision (P = 0.01). Revision of TIPS was associated with lower mortality (26% vs 46%) and significantly lower rates of transplant (13% vs 24%; P = 0.1). In predicting need for TIPS revision, DUS has a 40% sensitivity, 45% specificity, PPV 78%, and NPV 14%. The most accurate location for shunt velocity measure was distal velocity (Area under the curve: 0.79; P = 0.0007). CONCLUSION: DUS has poor overall sensitivity and specificity in predicting need for TIPS revision. Non-invasive methods of predicting TIPS dysfunction are needed since those needing TIPS revision had better survival.

Real-world Treatment Patterns and Reasons for Therapy Selection in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in US Oncology Practices.

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) is rapidly expanding beyond tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the first-line (1L) setting, with multiple TKIs and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) now being evaluated in combination. Real-world evidence describing current treatment patterns and reasons for 1L and 2L treatment selection in aHCC is sparse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional survey element was conducted using Cardinal Health's Oncology Provider Extended Network. U.S. medical oncologists identified adult aHCC patients initiating 1L systemic therapy between January 1, 2017 and July 31, 2019 and abstracted data from patient medical records. Data included provider characteristics, patient demographics and clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and physician rationale for treatment regimen choice. RESULTS: A total of 44 medical oncologists provided data on 284 aHCC patients. The median age at 1L initiation was 61.5 years, and the majority were male (78%) and white (66%). Nearly half (47%) initiated 1L treatment in 2019, 34% were ECOG performance status 2+, and 63% were Child-Pugh Class B/C. Among the 284 aHCC patients, TKIs were used by 94% of patients in the 1L setting, comprised predominantly of sorafenib (54%) and lenvatinib (38%). ICIs were most common among the 90 patients (66%) who received 2L treatment. CONCLUSION: In the community-oncology practice setting, nearly all aHCC patients received sorafenib or lenvatinib in the 1L setting, while the majority of patients received an ICI in the 2L setting. With recent ICI approvals in aHCC, this marks the beginning of an increased use of ICIs in the 1L setting.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma from diagnosis in routine clinical practice.

Aim: To assess real-world management of patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within an integrated delivery network. Materials & methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of adults newly diagnosed with HCC from January 2014 to March 2019. Overall survival and treatment journey were assessed over the entire available follow-up period per patient. Results: Of the 462 patients, 85% had ≥1 treatment. The 24-month overall survival rate (95% CI) from first treatment was 77% (72-82%). Majority of Child-Pugh class A (71%) and B (60%) patients received locoregional therapy first. Half (53.6%) of the patients with liver transplantation first were Child-Pugh class C patients. Sorafenib was the predominant systemic therapy. Conclusion: This integrated delivery network data analysis offers a comprehensive insight into the real-world management of HCC.

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Costs and Utilization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated at a Large Referral Center in Washington State 2007-2018.

INTRODUCTION: Though the treatment landscape for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved significantly with the refinement of liver-directed therapy techniques and the introduction of new drugs, few studies have investigated the impact of the changing treatment landscape on lifetime treatment costs, particularly in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease. We sought to investigate real-world clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare costs in a cohort of HCC patients treated at a single high-volume institution in Washington (WA) state. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2018 using abstracted electronic medical record (EMR) data linked to cancer registry data and health claims from commercial plans, Medicare, and Medicaid. We described clinical and treatment characteristics, including BCLC stage and Child Pugh score. We investigated median survival and mean lifetime treatment costs by BCLC stage using Kaplan-Meier cost estimator methods. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS: The final cohort included 215 patients, the majority of whom were white (71%), male (68%), and with underlying hepatitis C (61%). Mean per patient lifetime costs were highest in BCLC A and BCLC C patients. Mean lifetime costs in BCLC A patients ($292,134) was driven by surgery, hospital, pharmacy, imaging, and outpatient costs. Chemotherapy costs were highest in BCLC C patients, though not the predominant area of spending. Median survival was highest in patients with BCLC 0 and A disease; BCLC stage C and higher area deprivation index (ADI) were associated with poorer survival. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of WA state HCC patients, mean lifetime costs were highest in patients with BCLC A disease, attributable to surgery and hospital costs. As increased utilization of newer and less toxic therapies improves survival in BCLC C patients, mean lifetime costs in this group may also rise.

CNS Involvement in a Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Inspite of medication compliance, some chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients will relapse/progress into an accelerated phase or blast crisis. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is a rare manifestation of such a relapse. Here, we report a case of 23-year-old female who was diagnosed with CML in the accelerated phase and subsequently treated with imatinib. She developed early relapse in her CNS, and her treatment was switched to dasatinib and intrathecal chemotherapy with cytarabine and methotrexate. Her CNS disease went into remission, and she underwent matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). We discuss various mechanisms of treatment failure, importance of vigilance for symptoms and signs of treatment failure/relapse, indications for use of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and management of blast crises in CML.

Systematic review on infusion reactions associated with chemotherapies and monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to summarize the literature to date on the rates of infusion reactions (IR) associated with chemotherapies and monoclonal antibody (mAb) drug therapies used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and the associated clinical and economic impact. METHODS: This study searched Medline, Medline (R) In-Process, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for studies on IRs associated with chemotherapy and mAbs in mCRC patients from 2000-2011. RESULTS: For chemotherapy, the incidence of IRs ranged from 0-71% for all grades and 0-15% for grade 3-4. Rates of all grade IRs associated with cetuximab ranged from 7.6-33% and grade 3-4 IR rates were 0-22%. Rates of all grade IRs associated with panitumumab ranged from 0-4% and rates of grade 3-4 IRs ranged from 0-1%. The overall rate of IRs associated with bevacizumab ranged from 1.6-11%, with a rate of 0-4% for grade 3-4 IRs. A range of 50-100% of patients with grade 3-4 IRs terminated chemotherapy, and 34-100% of cetuximab patients with grade 3-4 IRs discontinued cetuximab therapy. No data were reported for bevacizumab or panitumumab. Only one study evaluated the economic impact of IRs. The study compared cetuximab administrations without an IR to those with an IR requiring resource utilization and found that mean costs were $9308 and $1725 higher for those with an IR requiring an emergency room visit or hospitalization and for those with an IR requiring outpatient treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IRs varies among different mAbs; and IRs may cause treatment disruption and require costly medical interventions.