Evaluation of Secondary Overtriage at a Rural Level 1 Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively assess the prevalence of secondary overtriage (SO) within a rural regional Appalachian health care system. METHODS: Trauma registry data was extracted for all trauma activation transfer patients from 2017 to 2022. Transferred patients were then stratified into two groups, non-secondary overtriage (non-SO) or SO. Patients were considered SO if they met three criteria following transfer: an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of less than 15, no required operative intervention, and discharge within 48 hours of arrival. Descriptive statistics were compared for age, length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and ISS. Surgical subspecialty consultations were compared between the two groups. Patients in the SO group were further assessed by body region of injury and Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS). RESULTS: Among 3,291 trauma activation transfer patients, 43% (1,407) were considered SO transfers. Patients in the SO group were significantly younger, had shorter average hospital and ICU LOS, and lower ISS compared to the non-SO group. Additionally, 25.7% of patients in the SO group had injuries to the head or neck of which 8.96% have an AIS ≥3. 21% of patients had injuries to the face, with 0.14% having an AIS ≥3. CONCLUSIONS: 43% of transfer patients in this study met our definition of SO. Although no optimal rate of SO has been universally established, limiting SO stands to benefit both patients and trauma systems. This study highlights how institutional analysis of transfer patients may help inform transfer protocols to reduce secondary overtriage and overutilization of scarce resources.

Effects of Trauma Center Consolidation on Adult Trauma at a Rural Level 1 Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the impact of consolidation of two rural level 1 trauma centers on adult trauma patients presenting to the remaining level 1 trauma center. To our knowledge, a study assessing the impact of trauma center consolidation on adult trauma patients had yet to be performed. METHODS: A single institution, retrospective study was conducted at a rural level 1 trauma center. Adult trauma patients who presented to our center from January 2017 to January 2022 were included. The cohorts spanned 33 months pre- and post-consolidation. Multiple demographic and outcome measures were gathered. Data were analyzed using the student's t-test and Chi-squared testing. RESULTS: There was a 33% increase in overall trauma activations and 9% increase in transfers from outside facilities post-consolidation. The post-consolidation group was significantly older, had higher mean injury severity score, and decreased hospital-free days. The post-consolidation group also saw an increase in ICU admission and surgical intervention. While there were no significant differences in ICU-free days or ventilator days, patients in the post-consolidation group with the highest level of activation who required both surgical intervention and ICU admission experienced decreased mortality. CONCLUSION: The consolidation of trauma services to a single level 1 trauma center in a rural Appalachian health system led to higher trauma volume and acuity, but most importantly decreased mortality for the most severely injured trauma patients.

Sclerosing Encapsulating Peritonitis: A Rare Cause of Bowel Obstruction.

Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP), also referred to as abdominal cocoon syndrome, is a rare cause of bowel obstruction characterized by a thickened fibrous peritoneum that encapsulates the intestines. The exact etiology is idiopathic but may be associated with long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). In the absence of risk factors for adhesive disease, preoperative diagnosis can be difficult and may require operative intervention or advanced imaging to diagnose. Thus, the inclusion of SEP in the differential diagnosis for bowel obstruction is essential for early detection. Existing literature is focused on renal disease as an origin, but it can be multifactorial. Here, we discuss a case of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis in a patient without known risk factors.

Poor Outcomes of Patients From Delayed Care After Ground Level Falls.

BACKGROUND: Ground level falls are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Delayed presentation in many conditions has been proven to lead to worsened outcomes. Currently, there are limited data on outcomes of those who have a delayed presentation after a ground level fall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of the Trauma Registry at our center. Any adult patient who presented after a ground level fall was grouped based on their time to presentation post-injury: less than or greater than 24 h. Age, gender, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, mechanical ventilation days, Injury Severity Score, and mortality were patient characteristics gathered. A Student's t-test and Chi-squared testing were utilized to determine the presence of significant differences between the groups. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Two hundred of 4018 patients had delayed presentation. Those with delayed presentation were more likely to be male (P = .028), younger in age (71 vs 74 years old, P < .01), had greater hospital LOS (6 vs. 5, P < .01), ICU LOS (5 vs. 3, P < .01), and mechanical ventilation days (13 vs. 5 days, P < .01). They also had higher ISS (8 vs. 7, P < .01), and mortality was significantly higher in those who presented after 24 h (P = .034). CONCLUSION: Patients with delayed presentation after a ground level fall have worsened Injury Severity Scores and outcomes to include hospital and ICU LOS, ventilator days, and overall mortality.

Effects of Trauma Center Consolidation on Pediatric Trauma at an Appalachian Pediatric Hospital.

With the increase in hospital consolidation over the past decade, multiple studies have been performed evaluating patient outcomes after consolidation. To date, there have not been studies performed to assess outcomes in pediatric trauma patients. The goal was to assess pediatric patient outcomes in a children's hospital after consolidation of two Level 1 Trauma centers in a rural Appalachian health system. A retrospective analysis of data from the Trauma Registry between October 2015 - September 2020 was performed. The variables included in analysis were age, injury severity score (ISS), hospital days, intensive care unit days, ventilator days, mortality, discharge disposition, consults, and hospital visit cost. Despite increased ISS, there was no difference in in-patient outcomes. However, these patients were more likely to require orthopedic evaluation and further outpatient care after discharge, suggesting more severely injured patients were evaluated by the trauma service post consolidation.

Identifying Attitudes Toward and Acceptance of Osteopathic Graduates in Surgical Residency Programs in the Era of Single Accreditation: Results of the American College of Osteopathic Surgeons Medical Student Section Questionnaire of Program Directors.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to quantify the number of surgical programs currently training osteopathic residents and to solicit advice for current osteopathic medical students who are interested in pursuing a surgical residency.  Methods A questionnaire was sent to all listed Electronic Residency Application Service® (ERAS®) email contacts for the following specialties: General Surgery, Neurological Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Otolaryngology, Urology, Integrated Vascular Surgery, Integrated Plastic Surgery, and Integrated Thoracic Surgery. The questionnaire was sent a total of three times. Results Two hundred sixty-four of the 1,040 surgical residency programs responded to the questionnaire. Of these responses, 19% were formerly American Osteopathic Association (AOA) accredited programs. About 47.3% of responding programs indicated they are not currently training an osteopathic physician. One hundred thirteen programs provided additional comments on how osteopathic medical students may improve the competitiveness of their residency applications. These comments included increasing volumes of research activities, performing well on the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE), and completing a sub-internship in the desired field or at a specific institution.  Conclusion Osteopathic students still face many barriers to matching into surgical residencies. This study provides concrete steps students may take to increase the competitiveness of their application.

Acute Rheumatic Fever: A Review of Essential Cutaneous and Histological Findings.

Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) is an autoimmune response that may occur after infection with group A Streptococcus. Clinical manifestations are protean, making the syndrome difficult to recognize in the 21st century. Secondary prophylaxis with benzathine penicillin is given for 10 years after an episode of ARF to prevent recurrence and reduce the risk of rheumatic heart disease. This case highlights the importance of providing a detailed clinical history to the dermatopathologist when considering ARF in the differential diagnosis.

Promoting Access of Osteopathic Medical Students to Surgical Residency Training Programs.

The COVID-19 pandemic has uncovered disparities for allopathic and osteopathic surgical applicants for the upcoming 2021 residency application cycle. It has provided an opportunity for change to the current paradigm in surgical resident selection. This study seeks to quantify the disproportionality of opportunities between allopathic and osteopathic students and provides solutions to level the playing field for all applicants.