Improving patients' readiness for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative interventions improve outcomes for patients after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). OBJECTIVE: To reduce mortality for patients undergoing urgent CABG. METHODS: Eight centers implemented preoperative aspirin and statin, preinduction heart rate less than 80/min, hematocrit greater than 30%, blood sugar less than 150 mg/dL (8.3 mmol/L), and delayed surgery at least 3 days after a myocardial infarction. Data were collected on the last 150 isolated, urgent CABGs at each center (n=1200). A "bundle" score of 0 to 100 was calculated for each patient to represent the percentage of interventions used. RESULTS: Scores ranged from 33 to 100. About 56% of patients had a perfect score. Crude mortality and composite rates were lower in patients with higher scores, but once adjusted for patient and disease characteristics, the difference in scores was not significant. Higher scores were associated with shorter intubation: 6.0 hours (score 100), 8.0 hours (score 80-99), 8.4 hours (score<80) (log-rank P<.001). Median length of stay was shorter for patients with higher scores: 5 days (score 100), 6 days (scores 80-99), and 6 days (scores <80) (log-rank P<.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of interventions to optimize patients' "readiness for surgery" is associated with shorter intubation times and shorter hospital stays after CABG.

Extended Outcomes of Complex Coronary Disease in the Drug Eluting Stent Era.

BACKGROUND: Several randomized trials comparing bare-metal stents to Drug-Eluting Stents (DES) have demonstrated a significant reduction in Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) exists with the use of drug-eluting stents, without compromising survival. These conclusions are based on restricted inclusion criteria for patients and lesion. It is unknown if these results can be generalized to an unselected patient population and more complex disease. The objective of this study was to determine to what extent the availability of DES has impacted survival, TVR, and TLR in a large regional experience without the restriction of on-label indications. METHODS: Patients registered with the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group's PCI registry with single vessel coronary disease undergoing a first PCI were sorted according to the Bare-Metal stent (BMS) era (2001 - 2002) or the Drug-Eluting stent (DES) era (2004 - 2005) based on the time period their first PCI took place. Totally, 6,093 BMS and 5,651 DES patients were identified. Outcomes of survival, TLR and TVR were measured after one year. RESULTS: After 1 year, survival was comparable, TLR was reduced by 4.9% (absolute) and TVR was reduced by 5.4% (absolute) in the DES era compared to the BMS era. The TLR/TVR differences remained significant after propensity matching in the DES era vs BMS era (Mortality: HR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.83 - 1.28; TLR: HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32 - 0.46; TVR: HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.38 - 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: In large regional experience with a consecutive series of patients representing the contemporary practice of PCI, including both on and off label use, the frequent use of DES reduces the risk of TVR and TLR without compromising survival.

Serious renal dysfunction after percutaneous coronary interventions can be predicted.

BACKGROUND: A prediction rule for determining the post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (> or = 25% or > or = 0.5 mg/dL increase in creatinine) has been reported. However, little work has been done on predicting pre-PCI patient-specific risk for developing more serious renal dysfunction (SRD; new dialysis, > or = 2.0 mg/dL absolute increase in creatinine, or a > or = 50% increase in creatinine). We hypothesized that preprocedural patient characteristics could be used to predict the risk of post-PCI SRD. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on a consecutive series of 11141 patients undergoing PCI without dialysis in northern New England from 2003 to 2005. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the combination of patient characteristics most predictive of developing post-PCI SRD. The ability of the model to discriminate was quantified using a bootstrap validated C-Index (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve). Its calibration was tested with a Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. The model was validated on PCI procedures in 2006. RESULTS: Serious renal dysfunction occurred in 0.74% of patients (83/11141) with an associated inhospital mortality of 19.3% versus 0.9% in those without SRD. The model discriminated well between patients who did and did not develop SRD after PCI (ROC 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.91). Preprocedural creatinine (37%), congestive heart failure (24%), and diabetes (15%) accounted for 76% of the predictive ability of the model. The other factors contributed 24%: urgent and emergent priority (10%), preprocedural intra-aortic balloon pump use (8%), age > or = 80 years (5%), and female sex (1%). Validation of the model was successful with ROC: 0.84 (95% CI 0.80-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequent, the occurrence of SRD after PCI is associated with a very high inhospital mortality. We developed and validated a robust clinical prediction rule to determine which patients are at high risk for SRD. Use of this model may help physicians perform targeted interventions to reduce this risk.

Long-term survival after surgery versus percutaneous intervention in octogenarians with multivessel coronary disease.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information comparing long-term survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients aged 80 years and older. We studied the long-term survival of octogenarians with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI or CABG who might have been candidates for either procedure. METHODS: We identified 1693 patients, aged 80 to 89, with two-vessel disease (57.6%) or three-vessel disease (42.4%), without left main disease, undergoing a first, nonemergency revascularization from 1992 to 2001. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for CABG versus PCI. Because survival curves for these procedures crossed midway through year 1, results were analyzed separately for the first 6 months and 6 months to 8 years. RESULTS: PCI was performed in 54.6% of patients with two-vessel disease and 23.7% of those with three-vessel disease. More CABG patients were men (54.7% versus 43.3%). The CABG patients had more peripheral vascular disease (23.1% versus 15.2%) and congestive heart failure (24.5% versus 13.1%) but less renal failure (4.6% versus 9.1%) and fewer prior myocardial infarctions (48.7% versus 53.6%). In-hospital mortality was 3.0% for PCI and 5.9% for CABG (p = 0.005). CABG was associated with poorer survival than PCI during the first 6 months (HR, 1.32; p = 0.135). Survival from 6 months to 8 years was significantly better with CABG for the group as a whole (HR, 0.72; p = 0.005) and for patients with two-vessel disease (HR, 0.68; p = 0.016), and there was a nonsignificant trend for those with three-vessel disease (HR, 0.75; p = 0.177). CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged 80 years or older with multivessel disease must consider the trade-off between the increased early risks of CABG in return for improved long-term survival.

Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in northern New England.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for patients with multivessel coronary disease (MVD) report similar long-term survival for CABG and PCI. These studies used a highly selected population of patients and providers, and their results may not be generalizable to actual care. Our goal in this study was to compare long-term survival of MVD patients treated with CABG vs PCI in contemporary practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: From our northern New England registries of consecutive coronary revascularizations, we identified 10,198 CABG and 4,295 PCI patients with MVD who may have been eligible for either procedure between 1994 and 2001. Vital status was obtained by linkage to the National Death Index. Proportional-hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for survival in CABG vs PCI patients after adjustment for comorbidities and disease characteristics. CABG patients were older; had more comorbidities, more 3-vessel disease, and lower ejection fractions; and were more completely revascularized. Adjusted long-term survival for patients with 3-vessel disease was better after CABG than PCI (HR, 0.60; P<0.01) but not for patients with 2-vessel disease (HR, 0.98; P=0.77). The survival advantage of CABG for 3-vessel disease patients was present in all patient populations, including women, diabetics, and the elderly and in the era of high stent utilization. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary practice, survival for patients with 3-vessel coronary disease is better after CABG than PCI, an observation that patients and physicians should carefully consider when deciding on a revascularization strategy.

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention among elderly patients in cardiogenic shock: a multicenter, decade-long experience.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics and hospital mortality rate for elderly patients in cardiogenic shock undergoing emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Early revascularization for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is recommended for patients < 75 years of age. This age-restricted recommendation is based upon evidence that elderly shock patients undergoing early revascularization have extremely high hospital mortality rates. The real world mortality rate for elderly shock patients undergoing emergent PCI has not been determined. METHODS: We examined a decade-long experience in our prospective registry of consecutive PCIs in Northern New England to assess the generalizability of these findings. Characteristics and hospital mortality were compared for elderly ( 75 years old) versus non-elderly (< 75 years old) patients. Predictors of hospital survival were identified using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2000, a total of 310 out of 52,418 patients (0.59%) had PCI for cardiogenic shock, twenty-four percent of whom were elderly. Procedural characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Independent predictors of mortality for both groups were older age and the absence of collaterals; during the stent era (1997 2000), significant predictors were lack of stent placement and diabetes mellitus. The mortality rate for elderly shock patients undergoing PCI was 46%, which is significantly less than previously reported in randomized clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Real world selection of elderly shock patients for PCI is possible with mortality rates far less than seen in randomized trials.

Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions.

OBJECTIVES: Using a large, current, regional registry of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), we identified risk factors for postprocedure vascular complications and developed a scoring system to estimate individual patient risk. BACKGROUND: A vascular complication (access-site injury requiring treatment or bleeding requiring transfusion) is a potentially avoidable outcome of PCI. METHODS: Data were collected on 18,137 consecutive patients undergoing PCI in northern New England from January 1997 to December 1999. Multivariate regression was used to identify characteristics associated with vascular complications and to develop a scoring system to predict risk. RESULTS: The rate of vascular complication was 2.98% (541 cases). Variables associated with increased risk in the multivariate analysis included age >or=70, odds ratio (OR) 2.7, female sex (OR 2.4), body surface area <1.6 m(2) (OR 1.9), history of congestive heart failure (OR 1.4), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.5), renal failure (OR 1.9), lower extremity vascular disease (OR 1.4), bleeding disorder (OR 1.68), emergent priority (OR 2.3), myocardial infarction (OR 1.7), shock (1.86), >or=1 type B2 (OR 1.32) or type C (OR 1.7) lesions, 3-vessel PCI (OR 1.5), use of thienopyridines (OR 1.4) or use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (OR 1.9). The model performed well in tests for significance, discrimination, and calibration. The scoring system captured 75% of actual vascular complications in its highest quintiles of predicted risk. CONCLUSION: Predicting the risk of post-PCI vascular complications is feasible. This information may be useful for clinical decision-making and institutional efforts at quality improvement.

Brachial gradient in cardiac surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Review of the clinical and therapeutic implications of difference in arm blood pressure detected preoperatively in patients having heart surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective study of 53 patients (Group 1) with gradient and comparison with a group of 175 patients without gradient (Group 2). All patients had preoperative carotid duplex interrogation and operative epiaortic scanning. There was no statistical difference regarding age, sex, status, redo, diabetes, ejection fraction, prior myocardial infarct, hyperlipidemia, or creatinine level. Risks factors for Group 1 included peripheral vascular disease (P<0.0001) and cerebrovascular symptoms (P=0.0196). Severe carotid disease (>80% stenosis) was seen in 41.5% of Group 1 and 13.7% of Group 2 (P<0.0001) patients. Severe atherosclerotic proximal aortic disease was found in 39.6% of Group 1 and 10.8% of Group 2 (P<0.0001) patients. There were 7 patients with strokes in Group 1 (13.20%) and 9 in Group 2 (5.14%; P=0.06). Four patients died in Group 1 (7.54%) and 10 died in Group 2 (5.71%; P=0.74). CONCLUSION: Brachial gradient is a marker for increased carotid and proximal atherosclerotic aortic disease. Preoperative arch study at the time of catheterization is strongly recommended, as well as preoperative carotid Doppler and operative epiaortic ultrasound.