The effects of irrigation on outcomes in cases of perforated appendicitis in children.

INTRODUCTION: Appendicitis is the most common indication for urgent abdominal operation in children. Approximately 20%-30% of patients will have a perforation at operation. Intra-abdominal abscess after appendectomy is reported in 3%-20% of patients and adds significantly to hospital stay with increased morbidity and overall cost. Surgical dogma has long advocated for irrigation in the setting of gross pus to prevent abscess formation. METHODS: Following IRB approval, data were retrospectively collected for children who had undergone appendectomy for perforated appendicitis at one of two children's hospitals over the course of 5 y. Perforation was determined by review of operative notes. All patients had free fluid in their peritoneal cavity evacuated by suction, whereas some of the patients also had their peritoneal cavity irrigated with normal saline. Postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rates were determined based on clinical symptoms and confirmatory radiologic studies. RESULTS: There were 99 patients in the suction-only group and 139 in the irrigation group. Standard demographics were relatively similar between the two groups. There were significantly lower rates of intra-abdominal abscess formation (4.0% versus 17.2%, P = 0.002) and wound infection (1.0% versus 8.6%, P = 0.003) in the suction-only group compared with the irrigation group. We further analyzed abscess rates by surgical treatment, either laparoscopic or open appendectomy. There were 85 patients in the laparoscopic group and 152 patients in the open appendectomy group. In this subgroup analysis, there were also significantly lower rates of abscess formation in patients treated with suction only compared with irrigation in the laparoscopic (3.5% versus 18.8%, P = 0.012) and open appendectomy groups (4.2% versus 16.3%, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this retrospective review indicate that a suction-only approach significantly decreased rates of abscess formation and wound infections compared to irrigation in cases of perforated appendicitis in children.

The cuff leak test is not predictive of successful extubation.

In intubated patients the presence of a cuff leak (CL) is used as a predictor of successful extubation. CL is proposed to indicate laryngeal edema and predict which patients may develop complications such as postextubation stridor and eventual reintubation. Our objective was to evaluate the reliability of CL in our population of critically ill trauma patients. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients admitted to the trauma service who required mechanical ventilation. All patients undergo the CL test by a single respiratory therapist team before attempted extubation. Data collected included body mass index (BMI), endotracheal tube (ETT) size, length of time of mechanical ventilation, tidal volumes (Vt), and the size of the patient's trachea based on CT scan. The test is performed by the respiratory therapists and involves measuring expired Vt before and after the ETT cuff has been deflated and listening for an audible leak. A positive test result is defined as a CL greater than 10 per cent of Vt or, when volumes are not available, as audible air expired. From October 2005 to May 2006, 150 mechanically ventilated patients were identified and 49 charts were available for review. Forty-one patients had a cuff leak (+CL), whereas eight did not (-CL). The two cohorts were similar in age (+CL = 36.5 years, -CL = 38.1 years, P = 0.82), male gender (+CL = 70%, -CL = 50%, P = 0.25) ETT size (+CL = 7.4, -CL = 7.4, P = 0.57), and BMI (+CL = 28 kg/m2, -CL = 27 kg/m2, P = 0.71). The average tracheal diameter (+CL = 17.4 mm, -CL = 17.5 mm, P = 0.90) as well as the ratio of ETT and tracheal diameter was similar for the two cohorts (+CL = 0.65, -CL = 0.64, P = 0.73). Four patients (10%) in the +CL cohort failed extubation, whereas none of the -CL cohort failed (0%) (P = 0.40). The CL test does not reliably identify those patients who will require reintubation in our trauma population. In addition, the ratio of ETT and tracheal diameter is not predictive of successful extubation.