Venous Thromboembolism in Children and Teenagers Admitted for Trauma: A 5-Year Nationwide Perspective.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric trauma patients is under-investigated. The purpose of this study was to perform an evaluation of the risk factors for VTE after pediatric trauma, including readmissions across the United States. The Nationwide Readmissions Database for 2016-2020 was queried for all patients under the age of 18 years admitted for trauma. 276 670 patients were identified; 2063 (.8%) were diagnosed with VTE. Among those with VTE, 300 (15%) were identified during a readmission. Higher rates of VTE were seen in ages 15-17 years (n = 1,294, 1.3%, P < .001), penetrating injuries (n = 478, .9%, P < .001), and assault (n = 271, 2.7%, P < .001). The strongest risk factor for VTE was prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR 5.5 [4.9-6.3] P < .001). Our study found that a significant portion of post-traumatic VTE in children and teenagers occur during readmissions. A deeper understanding of the risk factors outlined here can guide enhanced clinical protocols, ensuring early detection and prevention of this complication.

Radial Access Techniques.

Transradial access (TRA) has gained traction in neurointerventions as studies continue to demonstrate improved access site safety and equivalent end artery effectiveness when compared with traditional transfemoral techniques. Herein, we describe the technical nuances of obtaining TRA with a focus on distal TRA, left TRA, and sheathless TRA using larger bore catheters. We also discuss various strategies to avoid access site conversion if radial artery spasm or radial anomalies are encountered and offer some solutions for forming the Simmons catheter especially when it cannot be performed in the descending aorta. Lastly, we provide some insights regarding contraindications to TRA.

Meralgia paresthetica treated by injection, decompression, and neurectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pain and operative outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Meralgia paresthetica is caused by entrapment of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) and often presents with pain. Multiple treatment options targeting the LFCN can be pursued to treat the pain should conservative measures fail, with the most common options being injection, neurolysis, and neurectomy. However, their efficacy in causing pain relief and their clinical outcomes have yet to be directly compared. The aim of this study was to interrogate the contemporary literature and quantitatively define how these options compare. METHODS: The electronic databases Ovid Embase, PubMed, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library were interrogated from inception to May 2020 following the PRISMA guidelines. Candidate articles were screened against prespecified criteria. Outcome data were abstracted and pooled by random-effects meta-analysis of proportions. RESULTS: There were 25 articles that satisfied all criteria, reporting outcomes for a total of 670 meralgia paresthetica patients, with 78 (12%) treated by injection, 496 (74%) by neurolysis, and 96 (14%) by neurectomy. The incidence of complete pain relief was 85% (95% CI 71%-96%) after neurectomy, 63% (95% CI 56%-71%) after neurolysis, and 22% (95% CI 13%-33%) after injection, which were all statistically different (p < 0.01). The incidence of revision procedures was 12% (95% CI 4%-22%) after neurolysis and 0% (95% CI 0%-2%) after neurectomy, which were significantly lower than 81% (95% CI 64%-94%) after injection (p < 0.01). The incidences of treatment complications were statistically comparable across all three treatments, ranging from 0% to 5% (p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple treatment options to target pain in meralgia paresthetica. The incidence of complete pain relief appears to be the greatest among the 3 interventions after neurectomy, accompanied by the lowest incidence of revision procedures. These findings should help inform patient preference and expectations. Greater exploration of the anatomical rationale for incomplete pain relief after surgical intervention will assist in optimizing further surgical treatment for meralgia paresthetica.

Navigating radial artery loops in neurointerventions.

BACKGROUND: Although studies continue to demonstrate lower complications in neurointerventions using transradial access (TRA) compared with transfemoral approaches, anatomic radial variants can be difficult to navigate and remain one of the frequent causes of access site conversion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of TRA failure in neuroendovascular patients with radial loops and suggest a protocol for managing these anomalies. METHODS: A prospective collection of patients undergoing TRA at participating institutions from July 2018 to September 2020 was reviewed. Patients with a radial loop were identified. Patient demographics and procedural characteristics were evaluated to determine predictors of both TRA failure and successful reduction of the radial loop. RESULTS: We identified 32 transradial neurointerventions in which patients had radial loops. Twenty-two (68.8%) were identified by diagnostic angiography, and the majority were performed for evaluation or treatment of an aneurysm (56.3%). TRA failure occurred in 13 (40.6%) of the cohort and happened more frequently in patients over 60 years of age (p=0.01) and those with recurrent radial artery diameters ≤2 mm (p=0.02). Of the 19 patients who had successful TRA, 12 (63.2%) procedures were performed through the recurrent radial artery. CONCLUSION: Although radial loops are associated with high transradial failure rates, our results suggest that the presence of a loop is not an absolute contraindication to TRA. Therefore, we recommend attempting loop navigation using our protocol. Patient age, vascular tortuosity, and recurrent radial artery size should help dictate when to convert to an alternative access site.

Implementation of a radial long sheath protocol for radial artery spasm reduces access site conversions in neurointerventions.

BACKGROUND: Many neurointerventionalists have transitioned to transradial access (TRA) as the preferred approach for neurointerventions as studies continue to demonstrate fewer access site complications than transfemoral access. However, radial artery spasm (RAS) remains one of the most commonly cited reasons for access site conversions. We discuss the benefits, techniques, and indications for using the long radial sheath in RAS and present our experience after implementing a protocol for routine use. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing neurointerventions via TRA at our institution from July 2018 to April 2020 was performed. In November 2019, we implemented a long radial sheath protocol to address RAS. Patient demographics, RAS rates, radial artery diameter, and access site conversions were compared before and after the introduction of the protocol. RESULTS: 747 diagnostic cerebral angiograms and neurointerventional procedures in which TRA was attempted as the primary access site were identified; 247 were performed after the introduction of the long radial sheath protocol. No significant differences in age, gender, procedure type, sheath sizes, and radial artery diameter were seen between the two cohorts. Radial anomalies and small radial diameters were more frequently seen in patients with RAS. Patients with clinically significant RAS more often required access site conversion (p<0.0001), and in our multivariable model use of the long sheath was the only covariate protective against radial failure (OR 0.061, 95% CI 0.007 to 0.517; p=0.0103). CONCLUSION: In our experience, we have found that the use of long radial sheaths significantly reduces the need for access site conversions in patients with RAS during cerebral angiography and neurointerventions.

Resection versus biopsy in the treatment of multifocal glioblastoma: a weighted survival analysis.

OBJECT: Diffuse tumor invasion in multifocal/multicentric GBM (mGBM) often foreshadows poor survival outcome. The correlation between extent of resection in gliomas and patient outcome is well described. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of gross total resection compared to biopsy for mGBM on patient overall survival and progression free survival. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with mGBM received either biopsy or resection of their largest enhancing lesion from 2011 to 2019. Relevant demographic, peri-operative, and radiographic data were collected. Tumor burden and extent of resection was assessed through measurement of pre-operative and post-operative contrast-enhancing volume. An adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for the covariates of age, number of lesions, satellite tumor volume, total pre-operative tumor volume, degree of spread, and location. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were identified with sixteen (47.1%) and eighteen (52.9%) patients receiving resection and biopsy respectively. Patients receiving resection exhibited greater median overall survival but not progression free survival compared to biopsy on IPTW analysis (p = 0.026, p = 0.411). Greater than or equal to 85% extent of resection was significantly associated with increased median overall survival (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Overall, our study suggests that resection of the largest contrast-enhancing lesion may provide a survival benefit. Our volumetric analysis suggests that a greater degree of resection results in improved survival. Employing IPTW analysis, we sought to control for selection bias in our retrospective analysis. Thus, aggressive surgical treatment of mGBM may offer improved outcomes. Further clinical trials are needed.