A retrospective analysis to determine the effect of independent treatment centres on the case mix for microsurgical training.

AIM: To determine the effect of Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTC) on microsurgical training. METHODS: A novel scoring protocol for stratification of cases suitable for microsurgical training was devised. This scoring protocol was applied to all patients who underwent cataract surgery on a single consultant dedicated training list between September and November 2004. These patients are representative of patients remaining on the waiting list after ISTC selection, that is, the residual case mix. Patients who underwent cataract surgery on the same consultant list in the same period in 2003 were also analysed when there was no ISTC or other waiting list initiative in operation. RESULTS: Data was available for 129 patients. Seventy three patients underwent cataract surgery between September and November 2003 and 56 patients underwent cataract surgery in the same period in 2004. Using the devised scoring protocol, the mean score in the 2003 group was 1.08 +/-1.75 (range, 0.0-10.5) and for the 2004 group the mean score was 2.31 +/-2.65 (range, 0.0-4.5). A Mann-Whitney test showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the scores in the two groups (P=0.0009). With Independent Sector Treatment Centre implementation the percentage of cases suitable only for consultants increased fourfold. CONCLUSION: The decrease in suitable cases for training as shown in this study is likely to have serious consequences on microsurgical training in the UK. We recommend that the results of this study are considered in any current or future plans for ISTC continuation and expansion.

Intravitreal triamcinalone acetonide for refractory uveitic cystoid macular oedema: longterm management and outcome.

PURPOSE: To establish the role of intravitreal triamcinalone acetonide (TA) in the long term management of refractory uveitic cystoid macular oedema (CMO) and to determine the long term visual outcome in these patients. METHOD: This is a retrospective observational case series. All patients had resistant CMO and active inflammation. The primary outcome measure was complete resolution of CMO on ocular coherence tomography. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure were also monitored. Twelve eyes of twelve patients received 2 (n = 10) to 4 (n = 2) mg of intravitreal TA. All had previously been unresponsive to orbital floor steroids. Fluorescein angiography was performed where indicated. RESULTS: There was complete resolution of CMO in all patients. Nine patients had improvement in acuity at there final follow up (mean follow up 40.5 months). Seven had improved by 2 lines (58%). In 3 patients there was no visual improvement. These 3 failed to respond to re-treatment. Five other patients were re-treated because of recurring CMO and deteriorating VA (median time to re-treatment 4 mths). The mean number of re-treatments for this group with orbital floor TA was three. 41.6% of patients developed ocular hypertension (33.8 mhg mean). One required a trabeculectomy. CONCLUSIONS: 2 mg of intravitreal TA is effective even in cases of resistant uveitic CMO. Although re-treatment is often required, the initial response to treatment can be maintained by subsequent orbital floor steroid injections.

A mathematical model of factors that influence the performance of accommodative intraocular lenses.

In this work a mathematical model of capsule movement during pseudophakic accommodation is described to allow identification and evaluation of factors that may explain the variation in effect of accommodative intraocular lenses (IOLs) between patients. The model assumes that increasing vitreous pressure pushes the lens capsule forward as a circular diaphragm and that this movement is from a fixed fulcrum. With an IOL in situ, the capsule is taken to have a non-uniform thickness due to the presence of the anterior capsulorhexis. The model assumes a uniform capsular elasticity and ignores contributions from cellular elements such as posterior capsule opacification. Using our model and a regression formula to calculate capsular bag size, taking into account axial length and keratometry values, we are able to predict accommodative effect in individual patients. By simple geometry we have developed a mathematical model to identify variables that are important in pseudophakic accommodation. It provides the basis for the development of a more complex model that would address the movement of a lens taking into account the influence of the zonular system during accommodation.