Possible role of ROS as mediators of hypoxia-induced ion transport inhibition of alveolar epithelial cells.

In oxygen-sensitive excitable cells, responses to hypoxia are initiated by membrane depolarization due to closing of the K channels that is thought to be mediated by a decrease in reactive oxygen species (ROS). Because the mechanisms of hypoxic inhibition of ion transport of alveolar epithelial cells (Planes C, Friedlander G, Loiseau A, Amiel C, and Clerici C. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 271: L70-L78, 1996; Mairbäurl H, Wodopia R, Eckes S, Schulz S, and Bärtsch P. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 273: L797-L806, 1997) are not yet understood, we tested the possible involvement of a hypoxia-induced change in ROS that might control transport activity. Transport was measured as (86)Rb and (22)Na uptake in A549 cells exposed to normoxia, hyperoxia, or hypoxia together with ROS donors and scavengers. H(2)O(2) < 1 mM did not affect transport, whereas 1 mM H(2)O(2) activated (22)Na uptake (+200%) but inhibited (86)Rb uptake (-30%). Also hyperoxia, aminotriazole plus menadione, and diethyldithiocarbamate inhibited (86)Rb uptake. N-acetyl-L-cysteine, diphenyleneiodonium, and tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl, used to reduce ROS, inhibited (86)Rb uptake, thus mimicking the hypoxic effects, whereas deferoxamine, superoxide dismutase, and catalase were ineffective. Also, hypoxic effects on ion transport were not prevented in the presence of H(2)O(2), diethyldithiocarbamate, and N-acetyl-L-cysteine. These results indicate that ion transport of A549 cells is significantly affected by decreasing or increasing cellular ROS levels and that it is possible that certain species of ROS might mediate the hypoxic effects on ion transport of alveolar epithelial cells.

Speech accommodations to dementia.

This study investigated whether spouses would adopt a specialized speech register when communicating with adults with probable Alzheimer's disease. A picture description task was used so that the effectiveness of such speech accommodations could be assessed. The AD subjects did not vary the syntactic complexity, semantic complexity, or content of their descriptions when they were describing individual pictures versus directing their spouse to choose one of four pictures in a barrier task. The spouses' picture descriptions were more complex syntactically and semantically than the AD subjects' and included more highly salient elements. The spouses also varied the complexity and content of their descriptions, reducing syntactic and semantic complexity and increasing references to highly salient picture elements during the barrier task. These accommodations appeared to facilitate the AD subjects' performance on the picture description task.