Identifying drivers of first-line HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer treatment choices.

Aim: Assess factors associated with first-line (1L) treatment for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Materials & methods: A cross-sectional survey of 250 US oncologists was conducted. Correlations were calculated between treatment class and demographics, treatment perceptions and other clinical/nonclinical characteristics. Results: Efficacy and safety/tolerability were critical in oncologists' 1L decision-making. CDK4/6i use positively correlated with proportion of Medicare and postmenopausal patients (r = 0.54-0.67). Chemotherapy use demonstrated positive correlations with perimenopausal and premenopausal patients and symptom burden (r = 0.31-0.42). Aromatase inhibitor (AI) monotherapy correlated positively with anticipated treatment compliance (r = 0.42). Conclusion: Efficacy and safety/tolerability were most important to 1L decision-making. Clinical characteristics corresponded with CDK4/6i and chemotherapy use. Anticipated compliance was associated with AI monotherapy use.

Patients in the USA with a certain type of metastatic breast cancer (mBC, i.e., HR+/HER2−) might get chemotherapy or hormone therapy alone instead of new and potentially better medicines called cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as their first treatment.Researchers wanted to understand how US cancer specialists decided the first treatment for this type of mBC. In a survey of 250 cancer specialists, researchers looked at different factors that might influence decision-making, including patient characteristics, doctors' opinions about the treatments and other medical and non-medical features. This study also examined the connections between these factors and the cancer specialists' choice of first treatment.Researchers found that cancer specialists care most about how well a treatment works and how safe it is when choosing the first treatment for HR+/HER2− mBC. They are more likely to use CDK4/6i if their patients have Medicare coverage or are older (i.e., women who have been through menopause). Chemotherapy is chosen if their patients are younger (i.e., women who are near and before menopause) or have more symptoms. Cancer specialists tend to choose first treatment with hormone therapy alone if they think their patients have a hard time following their treatment plan. The results showed that patient characteristics, doctors' opinions of treatments and other medical and non-medical factors play a role in choosing treatment for HR+/HER2− mBC. By understanding these factors, researchers can work toward improving treatment choices for patients with this type of mBC.

The lack of predictors for rapid progression in prostate cancer patients receiving sipuleucel-T.

Sipuleucel-T is an immunotherapy indicated for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. It offers a new mechanism to treat prostate cancer without the side effects of hormone therapies and chemotherapies. In previous studies sipuleucel-T did not delay disease progression, but demonstrated an overall survival benefit compared to placebo. While clinical trials have evaluated the effects of sipuleucel-T on overall survival and progression, more studies are needed to evaluate its effectiveness and role in the management of prostate cancer. The objective of this study is to identify the incidence and possible predictors for disease progression in patients receiving sipuleucel-T. A retrospective review of patients who received sipuleucel-T between 1 September 2010 and 11 October 2011 was conducted (n = 36). Patients who changed therapy or died within 120 days were classified as experiencing rapid progression. Potential predictors of rapid progression were examined using logistic regression. Seven patients met criteria for rapid progression. Progression occurred in 72.2% of all patients. The median days to progression was 158. No significant predictors of rapid progression were identified. Currently no predictors have been found to be associated with rapid progression in prostate cancer patients on sipuleucel-T.

Changes to medication-use processes after overdose of U-500 regular insulin.

PURPOSE: Modifications made to medication-use processes after an overdose of U-500 regular insulin are described. SUMMARY: After a medication error occurred with U-500 regular insulin, a multidisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, advanced-practice nurses, and pharmacists was created to review and improve the ordering, dispensing, and administration processes associated with U-500 regular insulin. The group determined that current safety practices for managing insulin were inadequate. New safety processes specific to U-500 regular insulin were developed and implemented. Vials of U-500 regular insulin are no longer dispensed to nursing units and are stored only in the pharmacy and separated from other insulins. The ordering of U-500 regular insulin is limited to the endocrinology service, and all orders are written using a specialized U-500 regular insulin order set. The option for i.v. administration for U-500 regular insulin was removed from the pharmacy order-entry system; thus, only the subcutaneous route is entered by the pharmacist. In addition, patient-specific doses of U-500 regular insulin are prepared in the pharmacy using only tuberculin syringes that require a double check by two pharmacists. These syringes are delivered to patient care areas in a bag distinguishing the medication as "high alert." One last safety check involving a two-nurse check at the bedside to confirm correct medication administration is performed. Lastly, patient education material specifically for U-500 regular insulin is available online. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary team recommended modifications to the medication-use system regarding U-500 regular insulin after review of a medication error. No errors involving U-500 regular insulin have been reported since implementation of the changes.

Subcellular localization of GABA receptors in the central nervous system using post-embedding immunohistochemistry.

The following detailed protocol can be applied to demonstrate the localization of GABA receptors in CNS neurons at the ultrastructural level. While others have investigated receptors at the electron microscopic level using immunocytochemical techniques, the appearance of the tissue is usually poor and analyses of the distribution of receptors is limited. The methodology described in this paper allows for optimal preservation of the tissue while retaining immunogenicity. It does this, in part, by utilizing a balanced salt solution washout in conjunction with fixation. When the ionic composition of a fixative solution differs from extracellular fluids, like in most fixation protocols for electron microscopy, ultrastructural changes may occur in the tissue. Balanced salt solutions, like the Tyrode solution used here, helps maintain the normal extracellular environment allowing the fixing agent to reach sufficient concentration to bring about permanent and more optimal fixation even when reduced amounts of glutaraldehyde are required to preserve antigenicity. Therefore, unlike many protocols for post-embedding immunoelectronmicroscopy, this method allows for superior preservation of tissue ultrastructure compared to results previously published by others.