Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum chrome (sCr) and cobalt (sCo) concentrations are associated with local tissue adverse reactions to metal debris following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR). Serum metal ions <2 µg/l are probably of little clinical relevance and a pragmatic "safe" threshold <5 µg/l has been suggested.The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if a careful selection of patients combined with optimal implant positioning could eliminate cases with "unsafe" serum metal ion levels. A secondary aim was to study the association between different risk factors and having Co and/or Cr levels >5 µg/l. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of 410 consecutive patients operated on with a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant between 2001 and 2014. 288 of these had a unilateral MoM-HR, pelvic and true lateral radiographs, and a related sCo and sCr sample, and were included in the final analysis. They were allocated to either a presumed "optimal group" consisting of only men aged <60 years old, with femoral head component >48 mm diameter, and with a cup positioned within Lewinnek's safe zones, or a "suboptimal group" consisting of the remaining patients. Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the optimal group 48% (47/97) had serum metal ions >2 µg/l and 8% (8/97) >5 µg/l compared to 61% (116/191) and 18% (34/191) in the suboptimal group, p = 0.059 and p = 0.034 respectively. Acetabular cups with an anteversion <5 degrees had the highest odds ratio, 6.5 (95% CI, 3.0-14.3), of having sCo and sCr concentrations exceeding 5 µg/l. CONCLUSIONS: A well oriented BHR acetabular component in a presumably "optimal" patient reduces the risk of having elevated serum metal ions but does not eliminate it. Insufficient cup anteversion seems to be the strongest associated factor of elevated serum metals.

99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT versus 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT in chronic prosthetic joint infection: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC-SPECT/CT combined with 99mTc-nanocollloid SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-WBC-PET/CT combined with 99mTc-Nanocollloid SPECT/CT for the diagnosis and treatment evaluation of chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: Patients with suspected chronic PJI were examined with 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT, 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT, and 99mTc-nanocolloid SPECT/CT (to visualize bone marrow). The location and patterns of uptake were noted and compared between the two leukocyte examinations. Both leukocyte examinations were evaluated visually for infection. The PET examinations were also evaluated semiquantitatively. Chronic PJI was verified clinically by microbial culture and successfully treated PJI was confirmed by 12 months symptom-free follow-up after cessation of antibiotics. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included with 10 hip prostheses and nine knee prostheses. Fourteen were diagnosed with chronic PJI and five with successfully treated PJI. The sensitivity of visual evaluation of 99mTc-WBC-HMPAO SPECT/CT for all joints was 0.31 and for 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT 0.38. The specificity was 0.80 and 0.83, respectively. All patients with a true-positive SPECT examination had a false-negative PET examination and vice versa. Semiquantitative evaluation of the hips gave an area under the curve of 0.905 using the iliac crest as the background. Semiquantitative evaluation of the knees did not produce significant results. CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed no difference in the sensitivity or specificity of 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-WBC PET/CT when combined with 99mTc-nanocollloid SPECT/CT in the diagnosis or treatment evaluation of suspected late chronic PJI.

Dual-tracer approach vs. dual time-point approach in leukocyte scintigraphy in treatment evaluation of persistent chronic prosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Both dual time-point 99mTc-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (HMPAO)-leukocyte scintigraphy and dual-tracer 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy (with the addition of 99mTc-nanocolloid bone marrow scintigraphy) have been used to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A treatment evaluation of persistent PJI using these imaging protocols has yet to be presented. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of dual time-point 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy to the dual-tracer alternative of single time-point 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy or single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) combined with a 99mTc-nanocolloid bone marrow scintigraphy or SPECT/CT, for treatment evaluation of PJI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-one PJI patients under antibiotic treatment were included in this retrospective study. Examinations were organized into three settings. Setting one used dual time-point approach with delayed (2 h) and late (24 h) planar 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy, including both visual and semiquantitative analysis. Setting two used delayed (2 h) planar 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy combined with 99mTc-nanocolloid bone marrow scintigraphy and for setting three SPECT/CT replaced planar imaging. RESULTS: Accuracy was 0.68 for visual evaluation and 0.55 for semiquantitative evaluation of setting one; 0.71 for setting two; and 0.68 for setting three. Sensitivity was 0.54 for visual evaluation and 0.31 for semiquantitative evaluation of setting one; 0.38 for setting two; and 0.46 for setting three. Specificity was 0.78 for visual evaluation and 0.72 for semiquantitative evaluation of setting one; 0.94 for setting two; and 0.83 for setting three. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity between the approaches for treatment evaluation of suspected persistent PJI in the hip or knee was observed.

Is 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte imaging an accurate method in evaluating therapy result in prosthetic joint infection and diagnosing suspected chronic prosthetic joint infection?

BACKGROUND: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte imaging in evaluating therapy result in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and in diagnosing suspected chronic PJI. METHODS: Sixty-two patients (63 joints) with microbiologically verified PJI were examined by leukocyte imaging to evaluate therapy result during or at the end of antibiotic treatment or if the patient had a chronic PJI after treatment. Group 1 consisted of 49 patients with on-going or within less than 14 days of ending antibiotic treatment examined to evaluate response. Group 2 consisted of 13 patients examined after completed treatment on suspicion of chronic PJI with no or recently initiated renewed antibiotic treatment. This study applied a combination of different imaging approaches of 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy: delayed and late planar images, bone marrow imaging and SPECT/CT imaging. All joints were examined with at least two of the approaches and 53 joints with all three approaches. The report was based on the combined results of the approaches used. A chronic PJI was confirmed with a positive microbiological culture. A cured infection was confirmed with either a negative culture or at least 24 months antibiotic-free follow-up with no relapse. RESULTS: In the therapy evaluation group sensitivity was 0.57 and specificity was 0.81. In the suspected chronic infection group sensitivity was 1.00 and specificity 0.91. CONCLUSIONS: 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte imaging appears to be an accurate method to diagnose or exclude chronic PJI, but cannot be recommended for therapy evaluation of PJI in patients with on-going antibiotic treatment.

Patient-reported outcomes in hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a register-based matched cohort study of 726 patients.

Background and purpose - The theoretical mechanical advantages of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoM-HR) compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been questioned. Studies including measures of patient-reported function, physical activity, or health-related quality of life have been sparse. We compared patient-reported outcomes in MoM-HR patients with a matched group of patients with conventional THA at 7 years post-surgery. Patients and methods - Patients and patient data were retrieved from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. The case group, consisting of 363 patients with MoM-HR, was matched 1:1 with a control group, consisting of patients with a conventional THA. Patients were sent a postal patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) questionnaire including the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), EQ-5D, and VAS pain. We used multivariable linear regression analyses to investigate the influence of prosthesis type. Results - 569 patients (78%) returned the questionnaire with complete responses (299 MoM-HRs and 270 conventional THAs). MoM-HR was associated with better scores in HOOS function of daily living (4 percentage units) and HOOS function in sport and recreation (8 percentage units) subscales. Type of prosthesis did not influence HOOS quality of life, HOOS pain, HOOS symptoms, EQ-5D index, hip pain, or satisfaction as measured with visual analog scales. Interpretation - At mean 7 years post-surgery, patients with hip resurfacing had somewhat better self-reported hip function than patients with conventional THA. The largest difference between groups was seen in the presumed most demanding subscale, i.e., function in sport and recreation.

Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection With a Two-stage Protocol Using Static Spacers.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but whether this should be performed with a static antibiotic spacer or an articulating one that allows range of motion before reimplantation remains controversial. It is unclear if the advantages of articulating spacers (easier surgical exposure during reimplantation and improved postoperative flexion) outweigh the disadvantages of increased cost and complexity in the setting of similar rates of infection eradication. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the ultimate range of motion; and (2) to determine the proportion of patients who remained free of infection at a minimum 2 years after treatment with static antibiotic spacers as part of a two-stage revision TKA for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2011, we treated 121 patients with chronically infected TKAs, of whom three had medical comorbidities precluding a two-stage exchange, four had died before 2-year followup for reasons other than the surgical intervention, and seven were lost to followup. The remaining 107 patients (109 knees; 53 men and 54 women) were treated using a two-stage approach with static spacers and are evaluated here at a mean of 3.7 years (range, 2.0-9.8 years); no patients were treated with articulating spacers during this study period. Twenty-five percent (27 of 109) of the organisms isolated the first-stage procedure were resistant to methicillin and/or vancomycin. Median age at the time of reimplantation was 67 years (range, 42-89 years). Range of motion was measured by an independent physical therapist with a standard goniometer. Knee Society knee and function scores were calculated before the first stage and at the 2-year mark. Because many of these patients were treated before consensus definitions of infection were established, we made the diagnosis of infection (and established that a patient was believed to be free of infection) using the approaches prevalent at that time, which generally included presence of a sinus tract communicating directly with the implant, two positive tissue cultures, or a combination of cultures, fluid analysis, and serology. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 67 knees had full extension and no patients had a flexion contracture > 10°. Median flexion was 100° (range, 60°-139°). Thirty-nine knees had postoperative flexion > 120°. Ninety-four percent of patients were clinically free of infection at last followup. CONCLUSIONS: Our two-stage exchange protocol with static spacers yielded comparable flexion and infection eradication when compared with other recent studies that have used articulating spacers. The large proportion of resistant organisms is alarming. Future multicenter studies should compare static with articulating spacers and should evaluate both cost and efficacy, because our study suggests that adequate range of motion can be achieved without the added cost of the articulating spacer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.