Phase I and pharmacological study of two schedules of the antifolate edatrexate in combination with cisplatin.

The antifolate edatrexate has shown moderate activity against cancers of the head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer, as has cisplatin. Edatrexate demonstrates synergy with cisplatin in transplanted tumor models. This Phase I study was designed to evaluate two schedules of administration of cisplatin in combination with escalating doses of edatrexate, in a population consisting mainly of patients with these two cancers. The starting dose of edatrexate was 40 mg/m2. Dose escalation was to occur in 10-mg/m2 increments; the planned maximum dose level for study was 80 mg/m2. A total of 39 patients were registered. Eleven were treated on schedule A: cisplatin 120 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, and edatrexate weekly. Twenty-eight patients were assigned to schedule B: cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and edatrexate, both given every 2 weeks. On schedule A, the maximum tolerated dose of weekly edatrexate was 40 mg/m2, with dose-limiting toxicities of leukopenia, mucositis, and renal insufficiency. On schedule B, the maximum tolerated dose of biweekly edatrexate was 80 mg/m2, with leukopenia and mucositis as dose limiting. For schedule A, pharmacokinetic studies suggested a possible effect of cisplatin on the day 8 clearance of edatrexate. Studies on patients on schedule B did not show a clear effect of cisplatin on the day 15 edatrexate clearance. On schedule A, 5 of 9 evaluable patients had major responses (1 complete); whereas on schedule B, 8 of 25 patients had major responses (1 complete). Responses were seen in both head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer patients. For Phase II studies, use of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and edatrexate 80 mg/m2, both given biweekly, is recommended.

A phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced carcinoma of the esophagus.

PURPOSE: In a phase II trial of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil in metastatic esophageal cancer, we identified significant activity for the combination of agents, but there was severe associated toxicity. We therefore undertook a phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin without fluorouracil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction were treated. No patient who underwent prior chemotherapy was allowed to take part in the study. The majority (33 patients) had adenocarcinoma, and most (36 patients, 95%) had metastatic disease. Paclitaxel, 200 to 250 mg/m2, was given by 24-hour infusion on day 1, followed by cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, on day 2, with granulocyte colony stimulating factor support. Treatment was cycled every 21 days in the outpatient setting. The first 16 patients received paclitaxel at 250 mg/m2, but because of toxicity and treatment-related deaths, the dose was reduced to 200 mg/m2. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. Six patients were evaluated for toxicity after receiving only one cycle (due to toxicity or treatment-related death). Partial responses were seen in 14 patients (44%); responses occurred in 13/28 patients with adenocarcinoma (46%) and in one of four patients with squamous carcinoma (25%). Median duration of response was 3.9 months, and median survival was 6.9 months. Of twenty-five patients with dysphagia before therapy, eighteen patients (72%) had complete resolution of dysphagia, and two (8%) had partial resolution. Toxicity included grade 3/4 fatigue in 35% of patients and grade 4 neutropenia in 47% of patients. Nineteen patients (50%) required hospitalization for toxicity, and four patients (11%) died from therapy-related complications. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin has significant activity in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Because of hospitalization for toxicity and deaths resulting from treatment, the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin used in this trial cannot be recommended. The optimal dose and schedule of paclitaxel/cisplatin combination therapy remain to be established.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin, a new antifolate.

The 10-deazaaminopterins are a new class of rationally designed antifolates demonstrating greater antitumor effects than methotrexate in murine tumor models and human tumor xenografts. Their design was aimed at improving membrane transport and polyglutamylation in tumor cells, resulting in increased intracellular accumulation and enhanced cytotoxicity. Compared with other 4-aminofolate analogues, 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin (PDX) is the most efficient permeant for the RFC-1-mediated internalization and substrate for folylpolyglutamate synthetase. PDX demonstrates greater in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy than methotrexate or edatrexate. We undertook a Phase I study with PDX to identify the potential toxicities and define an optimal dose and schedule. Thirty-three patients were enrolled, all of whom had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and were treated previously with a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens. Initially, PDX was administered weekly for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle. Mucositis requiring dose reduction and/or delay in the first cycle occurred in four of six patients treated at the initial dose level (30 mg/m2), making this the maximal tolerated dose for PDX given on this schedule. The treatment schedule was then modified to every 2 weeks. Twenty-seven patients were treated twice weekly with a total of 102 four-week cycles (median, 2 cycles/patient). Mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity, with grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurring in the first two patients treated at the 170 mg/m2 dose level. Other toxicities were mild and reversible. No neutropenia was observed. The recommended Phase II dose is 150 mg/m2 biweekly. At that dose level, the mean area under the curve was 20.6 micromol x h, and the mean terminal half-life was 8 h. Two patients with stage IV NSCLC had major objective responses, and five patients had stable disease for 7 (two patients), 9 (one patient), 10 (one patient), and 13 months (one patient). PDX is a new antifolate with manageable toxicity and evidence of antitumor activity in NSCLC. A Phase II trial in NSCLC and a Phase I trial with paclitaxel are under way. These studies will also quantitate the expression of genes controlling internalization (RFC-1) and polyglutamylation of PDX in tumor cells as correlates of response.

Phase I trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: With preclinical evidence of synergy, this dose-finding trial examining the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine given with prophylactic filgrastim for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma was undertaken. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma received vinorelbine as an intravenous push immediately followed by docetaxel as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once every 2 weeks at 1 of 7 different dose levels. Vinorelbine was escalated from 15 mg/m(2) (Level I) to 45 mg/m(2) (Level VII) and docetaxel was increased from 50 mg/m(2) (Level I) to 60 mg/m(2) (Level VII). Prophylactic corticosteroids and filgrastim were employed prospectively. RESULTS: After completion of dose Level VII, accrual was terminated because Phase II dose intensity of both agents had been reached and further escalation was believed to be unsafe. At dose Level VII, one episode of first-cycle febrile neutropenia and a death after three treatment cycles due to Haemophilus influenzae sepsis (Grade 5 toxicity according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute) without neutropenia were noted. In all, 209 treatment cycles were administered and febrile neutropenia was observed in only 4 of these treatments (1.9%). Bacteremia occurred in three patients (four episodes) in the absence of neutropenia. Symptomatic onycholysis was observed in three patients. Clinically significant peripheral neuropathy and fluid retention were rare. Confirmed partial responses were noted in 10 patients for a response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 20-57%). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine at a dose of 45 mg/m(2), both given every 2 weeks, can be combined safely to achieve Phase II dose intensity of both agents. An ongoing Phase II trial will define the activity of this treatment combination.

Phase II trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel and vinorelbine are active agents in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and demonstrate preclinical synergism perhaps, in part, through their inactivation of the proto-oncogene bcl-2. We show that docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) and vinorelbine (45 mg/m(2)) can be safely combined when given on an every 2-week schedule with filgrastim, with encouraging antitumor activity observed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five chemotherapy naïve patients with advanced NSCLC received vinorelbine as an intravenous push immediately followed by docetaxel as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once every 2 weeks. Prophylactic corticosteroids, ciprofloxacin, and filgrastim were used. RESULTS: We delivered median doses of 450 mg/m(2) of vinorelbine and 600 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. The major objective response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 68%). With a median follow-up of 14 months, the predicted median survival time was 14 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 60% (95% CI, 44% to 80%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in five patients and five (1.3%) of 384 treatments. No dose-limiting neurotoxicity occurred. Symptomatic onycholysis and excessive lacrimation were observed after several months or more of therapy. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine 45 mg/m(2), both given every 2 weeks, is a highly active combination for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Filgrastim largely obviates neutropenic fever and allows for the single-agent dose-intensity of both drugs to be delivered. The occurrence of certain late toxicities can limit use in some cases and suggests that the combination could also be beneficial in settings requiring briefer, fixed periods of treatment, such as in induction or postoperative therapy.

Staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of CT and MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE: This article compares the accuracy of CT with that of MR imaging in staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled in a prospective staging protocol based on the International Mesothelioma Interest Group staging system. Sixty-five patients underwent CT and MR imaging and a surgical procedure (excluding percutaneous needle biopsy) to stage and resect the tumor. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. CT and MR scans were interpreted independently by observers who were unaware of the results of the other imaging study; these imaging findings were compared with the results of surgery and pathologic examination. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for eight of 10 features revealed by imaging showed no statistically significant differences between CT and MR imaging. However, MR imaging was superior to CT in revealing invasion of the diaphragm (A(z) = .55 for CT versus .82 for MR imaging) and in revealing invasion of endothoracic fascia or solitary resectable foci of chest wall invasion (A(z) = .46 for CT; A(z) = .69 for MR imaging). Several anatomic regions could not be evaluated because positive findings at surgery were rare. CONCLUSION: CT and MR imaging are of nearly equivalent diagnostic accuracy in staging malignant pleural mesothelioma. MR imaging is superior to CT in revealing solitary foci of chest wall invasion and endothoracic fascia involvement and in showing diaphragmatic muscle invasion; however, this advantage does not affect surgical treatment. For cost reasons, CT should be considered the standard diagnostic study before therapy.

Induction chemotherapy employing dose-intense cisplatin with mitomycin and vinblastine (MVP400), followed by thoracic surgery or irradiation, for patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy before surgery or irradiation has improved the survival of patients with Stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Encouraged by earlier results with preoperative MVP (cisplatin [120 mg/m(2) or 25 mg/m(2)/week], vinblastine, and mitomycin) for Stage IIIA patients with clinically apparent mediastinal (N2) disease, the authors conducted a Phase II trial of the safety and efficacy of induction MVP400 with the dose intensity of cisplatin doubled from 25 to 50 mg/m(2) per week. METHODS: From October 1992 to March 1996, 37 patients with Stage IIIA (26) or Stage IIIB (11) NSCLC began the MVP400 induction chemotherapy program. Four doses of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)), 7 doses of vinblastine, and 2 doses of mitomycin were given over 9 weeks. Patients received either surgery or irradiation after induction treatment. RESULTS: Overall, the response rate was 65% (95% confidence interval, 49-81%) with a complete resection rate of 67%. The median survival was 17 months, with 66% of patients alive at 1 year. Complete resection and Stage IIIA involvement were favorable prognostic indicators for survival. No Stage IIIB patients underwent a complete resection. Myelosuppression was the most common side effect. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although high response and complete resection rates were again demonstrated, results with the MVP400 regimen were not improved over those achieved with MVP regimen tested earlier with Stage IIIA (N2) patients. The authors continue to recommend MVP as an induction chemotherapy regimen for clinical trials.

Evaluation of chest computed tomography in the staging of patients with potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Chest computed tomography (CT) often is used to rule out lung metastases in patients with potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. In the current study the authors evaluated whether CT of the chest was necessary in patients with a negative chest radiograph. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 202 patients with negative initial chest X-rays who were undergoing evaluation for potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Patients with highly suspicious pulmonary lesions on the initial chest CT scan underwent a thoracoscopy and biopsy. All patients were monitored for the development of pulmonary metastases. RESULTS: Sixty patients (30%) had a positive initial chest CT scan. Two patients were found to have metastases by comparison with prior CT scans. Seventeen patients had highly suspicious lesions that were biopsied, but only 2 were found to have pulmonary metastases; the other lesions were benign. An additional 13 of these 60 patients developed lung metastases during follow-up, 6 of whom were diagnosed in retrospect. Of the 142 patients with a negative initial CT scan, 33 (23%) developed pulmonary metastases. The rate of pulmonary metastases in both groups was not significantly different, regardless of whether the CT scans were positive or negative. CONCLUSIONS: During routine preoperative workup for liver resection, the majority of lesions appearing on chest CT scans of patients with negative chest radiographs were not malignant. The positive yield of CT-guided workup was only 10 of 202 patients (5%). Based on this review the authors question the use of chest CT scans in this setting.

Phase I study of the sequential administration of edatrexate and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The antifolate edatrexate and the microtubule-stabilizing agent paclitaxel have both demonstrated single-agent activity in lung and breast cancer. In vitro, the sequential combination of edatrexate followed by paclitaxel produced synergistic antitumor effects. This trial was designed to find the maximum tolerated doses of edatrexate and paclitaxel when given every two weeks utilizing this sequential schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with solid tumors received edatrexate intravenously on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel intravenously as a three-hour infusion on days 2 and 16 of each 28-day cycle. Edatrexate was escalated from 40 to 120 mg/m2 and the paclitaxel dose fixed at 135 mg/m2. When the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, edatrexate was fixed at 120 mg/m2 and paclitaxel escalated to 175 and 210 mg/m2. RESULTS: All 34 patients were assessable. The maximum tolerated doses were 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate and 210 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Grade 3 myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, and an infusion-related reaction occurred. Eight patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and one with bladder cancer achieved major objective responses. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II doses are 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate days 1 and 15 and 175 mg/m2 of paclitaxel as a three-hour infusion days 2 and 16 of a 28 day cycle. These results warrant phase II trials of the combination leading to phase III studies comparing the two drugs to a single agent to confirm the preclinical evidence of synergy.

A phase II trial of interferon alpha-2a and carboplatin in patients with advanced malignant mesothelioma.

We defined the antitumor activity, toxicity, and tolerability of a combined chemoimmunotherapy approach in patients with advanced malignant mesothelioma using daily low-dose interferon alpha-2a and carboplatin given every 4 weeks. This was a phase II study of 15 patients with surgically unresectable or metastatic malignant mesothelioma. All patients had measurable or assessable disease. No prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy was allowable. Carboplatin was given at 150 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3 and interferon alpha-2a at 3 million units subcutaneously daily throughout the study. Treatment was recycled every 28 days. Therapy was continued until disease progression. Fifteen patients were assessable for toxicity and 14 for response. One partial response (7%, 95% CI, 0-20%), with a response duration of 40 weeks, was seen. Most patients had early progression of disease. Toxicity was tolerable, and grade III/IV toxicity was uncommon. The median time to progression was 14 weeks (range, 1-52 weeks). The median survival was 25 weeks (range, 8-66 weeks). The combination of low-dose interferon alpha-2a and carboplatin did not result in greater antitumor activity than that reported for single-agent carboplatin in advanced malignant mesothelioma. Although toxicity was mild, carboplatin and low-dose interferon, given at this dose and schedule, cannot be recommended for this patient group.

Comparison of phased-array and body coils for MR imaging of liver.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare liver lesion conspicuity using torso phased-array (TPA) and body coils with two pulse sequences. METHODS: Sixty patients with 125 focal hepatic lesions underwent T2-weighted fast spin-echo (T2-FSE) and fast multiplanar inversion recovery (FMPIR) imaging with a standard body coil and with a TPA coil. The first 30 patients were scanned identically in both coils with four acquisitions; the second 30 were scanned with four acquisitions in the body coil and two in the TPA coil. RESULTS: Liver-lesion contrast-to-noise (C/N) was significantly higher for the TPA coil both with four acquisitions (P< 0.001) and with two acquisitions (P < 0.002) using FMPIR, compared to with four acquisitions in the body coil. Liver-lesion C/N for T2-FSE was equivalent in both coils. Liver-lesion C/N was significantly higher (P<0.01) for FMPIR than T2-FSE both in the body coil and in the TPA coil. CONCLUSION: Liver-lesion C/N was significantly higher using the TPA coil rather than the body coil. Imaging time can be reduced by decreasing the number of acquisitions with the TPA coil.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the postpneumonectomy chest: normal and abnormal findings.

To determine the normal findings at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the postpneumonectomy space (PPS), and to evaluate the utility of MRI in detection of recurrent tumor in the postpneumonectomy chest, 32 MRI scans were performed in 31 patients at varying time intervals after pneumonectomy. Eleven patients also had 12 computed tomography (CT) scans performed at the same time to evaluate possible tumor recurrence. Of the 32 scans, 5 demonstrated complete obliteration of the fluid containing PPS, and 4 showed gas in the PPS; the remainder (n = 23) demonstrated persistence of fluid-filled spaces of varying size. The presence of a fibrotic rim of tissue was constant. In 11 patients with clinically suspected tumor recurrences, both CT and MRI were obtained: the two modalities performed with similar accuracy in diagnosing tumor recurrence at 16 sites; CT detected opposite-lung metastatic nodules not seen on MRI in one patient, and a rib metastasis described as "indeterminate" on MRI in a second patient. MRI detected a focus of recurrence in the PPS that was indeterminate on CT. There is considerable variability in the amount of fluid seen in the PPS on MRI. CT remains the procedure of choice for routine follow-up or in suspected tumor recurrence in the postpneumonectomy patient; MRI can be helpful if the CT scan is nondiagnostic or equivocal.

Solitary fibrous tumor. A cytologic-histologic study with clinical, radiologic, and immunohistochemical correlations.

BACKGROUND: Solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) are rare neoplasms that most commonly involve the pleura, mediastinum, and lung. They are believed to be submesothelial in origin. Histologically, they are characterized by fibroblast-like cells and connective tissue in varying proportions. The "patternless pattern" and the hemangiopericytoma-like pattern are the most common arrangements. The majority of SFTs have been immunoreactive for CD34. Very little has been reported regarding the cytologic findings in these tumors. METHODS: The authors reviewed the radiographic findings and studied fine-needle aspiration biopsies performed on seven patients with SFT of the pleura, and examined subsequent histologic material. The cell blocks or smears of all cases were stained with a monoclonal antibody to CD34. RESULTS: The cytologic preparations showed varying degrees of cellularity. Smears were comprised of spindled cells in a bloody background with small amounts of collagen. The three malignant tumors had a greater number of cells, both dispersed and in clusters, with nuclear pleomorphism and prominent nucleoli. The cell blocks characteristically showed varying degrees of cellularity with thickened blood vessels and a hemangiopericytoma-like pattern. The cells from the four benign tumors tended to be smaller in size and grouped in more cohesive clusters than the malignant ones. CD34 stained the spindle tumor cells in the cell blocks or smears from five cases; one malignant and one benign case failed to stain. The corresponding histologic samples from these cases demonstrated the same CD34 staining pattern in all cases except one. CONCLUSIONS: The differential diagnosis of SFT includes neurogenic tumors, mesotheliomas, sarcomatoid carcinoma, synovial sarcoma, hemangiopericytoma, and fibrosarcoma. CD34, when present, may prove equally helpful as a positive marker in cytology and in histologic preparations in the differential diagnosis of SFT.

Surgery for a post-chemotherapy residual mass in seminoma.

PURPOSE: We attempted to select patients for surgery of post-chemotherapy residual mass in advanced seminoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 55 patients with advanced seminoma underwent surgical exploration of a mass seen on computerized tomography (CT) after chemotherapy. Residual masses were defined radiographically as smaller or larger than 3 cm. and as well defined or poorly defined. Surgery consisted of complete resection of the mass and surrounding lymph nodes or multiple biopsies at sites of disease. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients 32 (58%) had masses resected and 23 (42%) underwent multiple biopsies. Of 27 patients with a post-chemotherapy 3 cm. or larger mass on CT 8 (30%) had residual tumor (seminoma in 6 and teratoma in 2), whereas necrotic tissue was found in the other 28 patients having a mass smaller than 3 cm. Well defined masses on CT were resected in 78% of patients and poorly defined masses could be resected in only 44%. Of the 8 patients with positive histology 6 remain alive and disease-free after complete resection of a well defined, larger than 3 cm. mass containing viable tumor, and 2 with a poorly defined mass died after biopsy only of residual seminoma despite salvage therapy. Three other patients who underwent complete resection of necrotic masses subsequently had relapse at distant sites and died. Median followup was 47 months (range 5 +/- 153+ months). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced seminoma who have a residual mass smaller than 3 cm. after chemotherapy do not benefit from surgery. For patients with a residual mass 3 cm. or larger we prefer surgery to define response, resect viable tumor when possible and direct further treatment.

Phase II trial of chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide (CQS) in patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide (CQS) was one of the first agents identified by the human tumor colony-forming assay (HTCFA) as possessing antitumor activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prior phase I studies had suggested that plasma concentrations equivalent to those showing efficacy in the HTCFA could be reliably attained in humans. This phase II study assessed the antitumor activity of CQS while using an adaptive control pharmacokinetic modelling system to attain targeted plasma levels of this novel compound. METHODS: A group of 20 patients with stage III or IV NSCLC received CQS as a 1-h weekly infusion at an initial dose of 2 g/m2. In all patients, 24-h plasma concentrations of CQS were measured. Patients with levels < 100 micrograms/ml had dose increases determined by their 24-h levels and pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from two prior phase I trials of this agent. These individuals had 24-h CQS levels repeated after their second weeks' treatment and doses were readjusted if the target concentration was not reached. Antitumor response assessment was made every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 18 attained the target plasma concentration, and 16 of these achieved this initially or with just one dose adjustment. No major objective antitumor responses were observed (major response rate 0%, 95% CI 0-17%). CQS was well tolerated with hypoglycemia being the most clinically significant toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: When given on this schedule CQS is inactive in NSCLC despite the fact that the target concentration was achieved in 90% of patients. The ability of the HTCFA to identify active agents remains unproved.

Phase II study of the combination of the novel bioreductive agent, tirapazamine, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Tirapazamine is a bioreductive compound synergistic with cisplatin in preclinical testing. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of tirapazamine with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with unresectable stage III-B and IV non-small-cell lung cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy were given tirapazamine (390 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) over two hours followed one hour later by cisplatin (75 mg/m2) i.v. over one hour every 21 days. RESULTS: Five of 20 patients (25%) had major objective responses (95% confidence interval, 11%-50%). Median duration of response was eight months with a one-year survival of 40%. Toxicities included temporary hearing loss (25%), muscle cramping, diarrhea, skin rash and nausea/vomiting. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic or renal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tirapazamine plus cisplatin appears to be safe and active in the treatment of advanced non-small lung cancer without a substantial increase in toxicity compared to cisplatin alone. A phase III randomized study compared the combination to cisplatin alone has completed accrual. Further evaluation of tirapazamine with other active agents and in multi-modality therapy is warranted.

High-dose edatrexate with oral leucovorin rescue: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study in adults with advanced cancer.

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of i.v. edatrexate with p.o. leucovorin. Thirty-one adults with advanced solid tumors received edatrexate as a 2-h infusion, once a week for 3 weeks, recycled every 28 days. p.o. leucovorin (10 mg/m2, every 6 h for 10 doses) began 24 h later. All had urinary alkalinization and p.o. hydration. Nine dosage levels ranging from 120 to 3750 mg/m2 were explored. Fatigue, epistaxis, nausea/emesis, mucositis, rash, myalgias, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transient elevations of serum aspartate transferase were observed. Leukoencephalopathy with clinical manifestations occurred in two patients (one had prior cranial irradiation). Pharmacokinetic studies carried out at the 120- and 1080-mg/m2 dose levels revealed no significant difference in the elimination half-life at the two dose levels studied and no significant intrapatient variability between day 1 and day 8 edatrexate administration. Serum edatrexate levels measured using a dihydrofolate reductase inhibition assay correlated with those by high-performance liquid chromatography. Three major and two minor antitumor responses occurred. The maximum tolerated dose was 3750 mg/m2, with grade 3 or 4 leukopenia (one patient), stomatitis (one patient), and leukoencephalopathy (one patient). Because of the occurrence of leukoencephalopathy, further study of high-dose edatrexate with leucovorin rescue is not recommended.

Management of residual mass in advanced seminoma: results and recommendations from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: Guidelines for management of postchemotherapy residual mass in patients with advanced seminoma remain controversial. We sought to characterize independent prognostic factor(s) for persistence of tumor to identify patients with a high risk of residual carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred four patients with advanced seminoma were assessed. All had achieved a complete response or partial response with normal markers to induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy and had radiographs available for review. Selected prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy characteristics were compared for patients who had either germ cell tumor histology at surgery or relapsed at the assessed site (defined as site failure) versus those who had only necrosis or fibrosis found at surgery and did not relapse at the assessed site (defined as site nonfailure). RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 47 months (range, 5 to 153), 94 patients (90%) were designated as site nonfailures and 10 (10%) as site failures. Site failure correlated only with size of the residual mass (< 3 cm or normal v > or = 3 cm; P = .0006). Two of 74 patients (3%) with residual masses less than 3 cm were considered site failures, compared with eight of 30 (27%) with residual masses > or = 3 cm. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced seminoma who have normal radiographs or residual masses less than 3 cm after chemotherapy can be observed without further intervention. The following three options exist for patients with a residual mass > or = 3 cm: observation, radiotherapy, or surgical intervention. We prefer the latter to define response, resect viable tumor when possible, and direct further treatment.

The proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma: application to imaging.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon and usually fatal primary neoplasm of the pleura. In the past, response to standard therapy has been poor [1-3], but recent studies suggest that some patients may benefit from various therapeutic options, including surgical resection, combined technique treatment, and immunotherapy [4-7]. With improvements in therapy, an accurate, widely accepted staging system will be important in selecting homogeneous groups of patients for entry into clinical trials. Multiple staging systems have previously been proposed for MPM, but none are universally used [8].