The impact of patient-reported frailty on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients after non-ST-acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: As life expectancy increases, the population of older individuals with coronary artery disease and frailty is growing. We aimed to assess the impact of patient-reported frailty on the treatment and prognosis of elderly early survivors of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). METHODS: Frailty data were obtained from two prospective trials, POPular Age and the POPular Age Registry, which both assessed elderly NSTE-ACS patients. Frailty was assessed one month after admission with the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and was defined as a GFI-score of 4 or higher. In these early survivors of NSTE-ACS, we assessed differences in treatment and 1-year outcomes between frail and non-frail patients, considering major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and major bleeding. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 2192 NSTE-ACS patients, aged ≥70 years. The GFI-score was available in 1320 patients (79 ± 5 years, 37% women), of whom 712 (54%) were considered frail. Frail patients were at higher risk for MACE than non-frail patients (9.7% vs. 5.1%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.43, p = 0.04), but not for major bleeding (3.7% vs. 2.8%, adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.65-2.32, p = 0.53). Cubic spline analysis showed a gradual increase of the risk for clinical outcomes with higher GFI-scores. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly NSTE-ACS patients who survived 1-month follow-up, patient-reported frailty was independently associated with a higher risk for 1-year MACE, but not with major bleeding. These findings emphasize the importance of frailty screening for risk stratification in elderly NSTE-ACS patients.

Measuring Activated Clotting Time during Cardiac Catheterization and PCI: The Effect of the Sampling Site.

RESULTS: In 100 patients (mean age 67.1, 65% male), no significant differences were observed in ACT values obtained from the guiding catheter and arterial sheath (mean difference (MD) -18.3 s; standard deviation (SD) 96 s; P=0.067). Contrarily, ACT values obtained from the intravenous line were significantly lower as compared to values obtained from the guiding catheter (MD 25.7 s; SD 75.5; P=0.003) and arterial sheath (MD 39 s; SD 102.8; P < 0.001). Furthermore, ACT measurements from the arterial sheath showed a statistically significant proportional bias when compared to the other sampling sites (sheath vs. catheter, r = 0.761, P=0.001; sheath vs. IVL, r = 1.013, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows statistical significance and possibly clinically relevant variations between ACT measurements from different sample sites. Bias in ACT measurements may be minimized by using uniform protocols for ACT measurement during cardiac catheterization.

(Retro)sternal chest pain?

A 58-year-old man with a significant medical history notable for a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in 2001 presented at our emergency ward with retrosternal chest pain caused by a dehiscence of the sternal wires post CABG.

Association between angiographic culprit lesion and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

BACKGROUND: Factors related to the occurrence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are still poorly understood. The current study sought to compare STEMI patients presenting with and without OHCA to identify angiographic factors related to OHCA. METHODS: This multicenter registry consisted of consecutive STEMI patients, including OHCA patients with return-of-spontaneous circulation. Patients were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and therapeutic hypothermia when indicated. Outcome consisted of in-hospital neurological recovery, scored using the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale, and 1-year survival. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with OHCA and survival was displayed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log rank tests. RESULTS: In total, 224 patients presented with OHCA and 3259 without OHCA. Average age was 63.3 years and 75% of patients were male. OHCA occurred prior to ambulance arrival in 68% of patients and 48% required intubation. Culprit lesion was associated with OHCA: risk was highest for proximal left coronary lesions and lowest for right coronary lesions. Also, culprit lesion determined the risk of cardiogenic shock and sub-optimal reperfusion after PCI, which were strongly related to survival after OHCA. Neurological recovery was acceptable (CPC≤2) in 77.1% of OHCA patients and did not differ between culprit lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In the present STEMI population, coronary culprit lesion was associated with the occurrence of OHCA. Moreover, culprit lesion influenced the risk of cardiogenic shock and success of reperfusion, both of which were related to prognosis of OHCA patients.

Nursing role to improve care to infarct patients and patients undergoing heart surgery: 10 years' experience.

BACKGROUND: The nurse practitioner may be the ideal healthcare worker to create a new environment and may facilitate in the process of expediting discharge and improving patient safety. They can play an intermediary role between the consultants, nurses and patients, thereby combining the aspects of care (nursing) and cure (physicians). METHOD: We describe the contribution and role of the nurse practitioner in a teaching hospital and provide an overview of the changes in care and cure that were facilitated by two nurse practitioners in the treatment of cardiac surgery patients or non-complicated acute coronary syndrome patients. RESULTS: The nurse-led clinic for postoperative patients has registered 1967 patients in the past 10 years. These patients were transferred at a mean of 5.5 days after their bypass operation. All patients had an uneventful clinical course in our hospital and were discharged alive. The period between discharge and outpatient clinic visit could be set at 4 weeks. The post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) group included 1236 patients. Mortality in this patient cohort was 4% while 0.4% of these patients experienced a re-myocardial infarction. Additional surgery was needed in only 2% of these stable post-infarction patients. The mean length of stay was 5.9 ± 14.5 days. CONCLUSION: This observational study confirms that a nurse-led postoperative care unit and post-ACS care unit is feasible and effective for the treatment of patients returning from cardiac surgery or transferred after uncomplicated ACS to a general cardiology ward.

High-dose tirofiban pretreatment reduces the need for bail-out study medication in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of a subgroup analysis of the On-TIME 2 trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the outcome of patients who received bail-out study medication and evaluated whether high-dose tirofiban (HDT) pretreatment may reduce the need for bail-out study medication. DESIGN: A prespecified analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised On-TIME 2 trial. Bail-out use of study medication was predefined and part of the combined clinical end point. PATIENTS: 984 patients excluded from many coronary intervention hospitals in different countries were randomly assigned to HDT or placebo. In the subgroup who received blinded bail-out treatment, patients pretreated with placebo who received bail-out HDT were compared with those pretreated with HDT who received bail-out placebo. Interventions Routine prehospital initiation of HDT versus bail-out use of HDT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electrocardiographic and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Blinded bail-out study medication was used in 24% (237/980) of patients, with a higher rate in patients pretreated with placebo: 29% (140/492) versus 20% (97/488), p=0.002. Bail-out versus no bail-out use of study medication was associated with more residual ST deviation (5.5±7.2 vs 3.7±4.8 mm, p=0.005), and worse clinical outcome (major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days 12.2% vs 5.6%, p<0.001), mainly due to poor outcome in patients who received HDT bail-out. In patients pretreated with HDT who received placebo bail-out study medication, residual ST deviation and clinical outcome did not differ significantly compared with patients who did not receive bail-out medication (4.0±4.6 vs 3.7± 4.8 mm, p=0.703, MACE 7.2% vs 5.6%, p=0.535). CONCLUSIONS: Routine prehospital treatment with HDT significantly reduced the use of blinded bail-out study medication. The need for bail-out therapy was associated with a less favourable outcome. This analysis suggests that routine pretreatment is superior to provisional use of HDT in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Acute and subacute stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: incidence, predictors and clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Early coronary stent thrombosis occurs most frequent after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVES: To identify the specific predictors of, respectively, acute and subacute stent thrombosis in patients after primary PCI for STEMI. PATIENTS/METHODS: Consecutive STEMI patients with angiographically confirmed early stent thrombosis were enrolled and compared in a 2 : 1 ratio with a matched control group. Clinical outcome was collected up to 1 year. RESULTS: Of 5842 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, 201 (3.5%) presented with a definite early stent thrombosis. Of these, 97 (1.7%) had acute stent thromboses and 104 (1.8%) had subacute stent thromboses. Postprocedurally discovered dissection, undersizing and smaller stent diameter were the strongest predictors for acute stent thrombosis. No glycoprotein IIb/IIIa therapy and the use of drug-eluting stents were also associated with acute stent thrombosis. Lack of clopidogrel therapy in the first 30 days after the index PCI was the strongest predictor for subacute stent thrombosis. Mortality rates at 1-year follow-up were lower for acute stent thrombosis than for subacute stent thrombosis (8.3% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.294). The incidence of definite recurrent stent thrombosis at 1-year follow up was significantly lower after a first definite acute stent thrombosis than after a first definite subacute stent thrombosis (6.4% vs. 19.3%, P = 0.007 at 1 year). CONCLUSIONS: The specific risk factors for, respectively, acute and subacute stent thrombosis after primary PCI vary greatly. Mortality rates are high for both categories of stent thrombosis. However, recurrent stent thrombosis occurs more frequently after subacute stent thrombosis.

A comparison between upfront high-dose tirofiban versus provisional use in the real-world of non-selected STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI: Insights from the Zwolle acute myocardial infarction registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite the proven benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), there is still debate on the timing of administration of these drugs and whether all or only a selection of patients should be treated. We evaluated the effect of routine upfront versus provisional use of high-dose tirofiban (HDT) in a large real-world population of non-selected STEMI patients. METHODS: Consecutive STEMI patients were registered in a single-centre dedicated database. Patients with upfront HDT therapy before first balloon inflation were compared with patients who received the drug on a provisional basis, after first balloon inflation. Initial TIMI flow of the infarct-related vessel and enzymatic infarct size and 30-day clinical outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Out of 2679 primary PCI patients HDT was given upfront in 885 (33.0%) and provisionally in 812 (45.3%). Upfront as compared with provisional HDT showed higher initial patency (22.3 vs. 17.9%, p=0.006), smaller infarct size (1401 IU/l (IQR 609 to 2948) vs. 1620 (753 to 3132), p=0.03) and a lower incidence of death or recurrent MI at 30 days (3.3 vs. 5.1%, p=0.04) without an increase in TIMI bleeding (p=0.24). Upfront HDT independently predicted initial patency (odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15 to 1.88, p=0.02), enzymatic infarct size (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.86, p=0.001) and 30-day death or recurrent MI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.95, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of upfront potent antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy in STEMI patients and encourage further clinical investigations in this field. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:592-7.).

Marked reduction of early stent thrombosis with pre-hospital initiation of high-dose Tirofiban in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: No randomized comparisons are yet available evaluating the effect of pre-hospital high dose tirofiban on the incidence of early stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether routine pre-hospital administration of high-dose tirofiban in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) decreases the incidence of early stent thrombosis after primary PCI. PATIENTS/METHODS: The Ongoing Tirofiban in Myocardial Evaluation (On-TIME) 2 trial was a prospective multicenter study of consecutive STEMI patients referred for primary PCI in which patients were randomized to pre-hospital no high-dose tirofiban/placebo. We examined the incidence of Academic Research Consortium definite and probable early stent thrombosis and determined predictors and outcome of early stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Primary PCI was performed in 1203 out of 1398 patients (86.1%). In 1073 patients (89.2%) a coronary stent was placed. Early stent thrombosis occurred in 39 patients (3.6%). Pre-hospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban significantly reduced early stent thrombosis (2.1% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.006) and was associated with a lower incidence of urgent repeat PCI (1.9% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.005). Early stent thrombosis, as well as pre-hospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban, was independently associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban reduces the 30-day incidence of stent thrombosis in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and stenting. Early stent thrombosis and pre-hospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban were independent predictors of 30-day mortality.

[Thrombosis of a coronary stent after discontinuing treatment with clopidogrel]. / Trombose van een coronaire stent na het staken van behandeling met clopidogrel.

A drug-eluting stent was implanted in four patients, a man aged 67 and a woman aged 42 with acute myocardial infarction, a woman aged 41 with unstable angina pectoris and a man aged 41 with stable angina pectoris. All suffered stent thrombosis after discontinuation (in three cases prematurely) of clopidogrel therapy. Reasons for discontinuation included allergic reaction, a dental procedure and refusal of reimbursement by the insurer. In order to restore stent patency they were treated by percutaneous coronary intervention and all patients suffered irreversible myocardial damage. Combination therapy using acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel during and after angioplasty for the prevention of long- and short-term complications is necessary. Stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation usually occurs within 1-4 weeks following discontinuation ofantiplatelet medication. These cases stress the importance of antiplatelet therapy after stent implantation. Physicians, dentists and patients must be aware of the risk of the early discontinuation ofantiplatelet therapy.

Antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary stenting: The risk of late stent thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation after coronary stenting is essential to prevent stent thrombosis. Drug-eluting stents, which are the preferred therapy, may be associated with a higher tendency for stent thrombosis. METHODS: Patients who underwent coronary stent placement and presented with late stent thrombosis are described. RESULTS: Eight patients with stent thrombosis are presented. Early discontinuation of the antithrombotic medication is associated with the occurrence of these complications. CONCLUSION: Long-term antithrombotic therapy seems essential to prevent stent thrombosis, especially for patients treated with drug-eluting stents.

Clopidogrel resistance: fact and fiction.

The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel in combination with aspirin has been shown to reduce thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, a large interindividual response variability to clopidogrel has been described. The reported rates of inadequate clopidogrel response vary considerably depending on the definition and methodologies used to measure the inhibition of platelet function. Recently, several (small) studies have demonstrated the clinical relevance of an inadequate response to clopidogrel. Moreover, several factors have been associated with a high interindividual variability in response to clopidogrel. These are: dosing, impaired intestinal absorption, cytochrome P450 3A4 and 3A5 activity, drug-drug interactions, polymorphisms of the receptors involved in the process of arterial thrombosis and hemostasis, and the method of measurement of platelet function. Future research for the evaluation of clopidogrel resistance should be based on the assessment of selective P2Y12 receptor inhibition (e.g., the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-assay or the measurement of stabilization of platelet aggregates) with quick and simple tests. Only then can we reveal the true prevalence and impact of clopidogrel resistance.