Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Critically Ill Adult Patient.

RATIONALE: Controversies and practice variations exist related to the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of the airway during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations on pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic topics related to RSI. DESIGN: A guideline panel of 20 Society of Critical Care Medicine members with experience with RSI and emergency airway management met virtually at least monthly from the panel's inception in 2018 through 2020 and face-to-face at the 2020 Critical Care Congress. The guideline panel included pharmacists, physicians, a nurse practitioner, and a respiratory therapist with experience in emergency medicine, critical care medicine, anesthesiology, and prehospital medicine; consultation with a methodologist and librarian was available. A formal conflict of interest policy was followed and enforced throughout the guidelines-development process. METHODS: Panelists created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions and voted to select the most clinically relevant questions for inclusion in the guideline. Each question was assigned to a pair of panelists, who refined the PICO wording and reviewed the best available evidence using predetermined search terms. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was used throughout and recommendations of "strong" or "conditional" were made for each PICO question based on quality of evidence and panel consensus. Recommendations were provided when evidence was actionable; suggestions, when evidence was equivocal; and best practice statements, when the benefits of the intervention outweighed the risks, but direct evidence to support the intervention did not exist. RESULTS: From the original 35 proposed PICO questions, 10 were selected. The RSI guideline panel issued one recommendation (strong, low-quality evidence), seven suggestions (all conditional recommendations with moderate-, low-, or very low-quality evidence), and two best practice statements. The panel made two suggestions for a single PICO question and did not make any suggestions for one PICO question due to lack of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Using GRADE principles, the interdisciplinary panel found substantial agreement with respect to the evidence supporting recommendations for RSI. The panel also identified literature gaps that might be addressed by future research.

Incidence and risk factors associated with early death in patients with emergency department septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Limited research has explored early mortality among patients presenting with septic shock. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and factors associated with early death following emergency department (ED) presentation of septic shock. METHODS: A prospective registry of patients enrolled in an ED septic shock clinical pathway was used to identify patients. Patients were compared across demographic, comorbid, clinical, and treatment variables by death within 72 hours of ED presentation. RESULTS: Among the sample of 2,414 patients, overall hospital mortality was 20.6%. Among patients who died in the hospital, mean and median time from ED presentation to death were 4.96 days and 2.28 days, respectively. Death at 24, 48, and 72 hours occurred in 5.5%, 9.5%, and 11.5% of patients, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the following factors were independently associated with early mortality: age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.05), malignancy (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.11-2.11), pneumonia (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.88), urinary tract infection (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89), first shock index (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.27-2.70), early vasopressor use (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.60-2.92), initial international normalized ratio (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27), initial albumin (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69), and first serum lactate (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.16-1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Adult septic shock patients experience a high rate of early mortality within 72 hours of ED arrival. Recognizable clinical factors may aid the identification of patients at risk of early death.

Empiric aztreonam is associated with increased mortality compared to beta-lactams in septic shock.

PURPOSE: To determine if aztreonam as initial empiric treatment of adult septic shock is associated with increased mortality compared to the use of anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam agents. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 582 adult emergency department patients admitted to 12 acute care facilities within a single health system from January 2014 to December 2017 with septic shock receiving either aztreonam or an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam for empiric treatment and discharged with an infection-related ICD-9 or ICD-10 code. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Initial exposure to aztreonam was associated with increased hospital mortality compared to treatment with an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam agent (22.7% vs. 12.9%, OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.27-3.11). When adjusted for APACHE II score, the treatment group effect on mortality remained statistically significant (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.08-2.80). Aztreonam use was also associated with increased utilization of aminoglycosides (28.9% vs. 12.4%, p < 0.0001) and fluoroquinolones (50.5% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in hospital or intensive care unit length of stay in surviving patients between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams, empiric treatment with aztreonam is associated with increased mortality and greater antibiotic exposure among patients with acute septic shock. These findings suggest that treatment with anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams should be prioritized over allergy avoidance whenever feasible.

Choosing Wisely For Critical Care: The Next Five.

OBJECTIVES: To formulate new "Choosing Wisely" for Critical Care recommendations that identify best practices to avoid waste and promote value while providing critical care. DATA SOURCES: Semistructured narrative literature review and quantitative survey assessments. STUDY SELECTION: English language publications that examined critical care practices in relation to reducing cost or waste. DATA EXTRACTION: Practices assessed to add no value to critical care were grouped by category. Taskforce assessment, modified Delphi consensus building, and quantitative survey analysis identified eight novel recommendations to avoid wasteful critical care practices. These were submitted to the Society of Critical Care Medicine membership for evaluation and ranking. DATA SYNTHESIS: Results from the quantitative Society of Critical Care Medicine membership survey identified the top scoring five of eight recommendations. These five highest ranked recommendations established Society of Critical Care Medicine's Next Five "Choosing" Wisely for Critical Care practices. CONCLUSIONS: Five new recommendations to reduce waste and enhance value in the practice of critical care address invasive devices, proactive liberation from mechanical ventilation, antibiotic stewardship, early mobilization, and providing goal-concordant care. These recommendations supplement the initial critical care recommendations from the "Choosing Wisely" campaign.

Unifying Resident Education: 12 Interdisciplinary Critical Care Simulation Scenarios.

Introduction: Unified critical care training within residency education is a necessity. We created a simulation-based curriculum designed to educate residents on core topics and procedural skills, which crossed all adult disciplines caring for critically ill patients. Methods: Residents from seven adult disciplines participated in this annual program during intern year. Learners were grouped into mixed discipline cohorts. Each cohort attended three distinct 4-hour simulation-based sessions, each consisting of four scenarios followed by postevent debriefing. The curriculum included 12 total clinical scenarios. Scenarios covered a broad array of complex critical care topics facing all adult specialties and reinforced important system-specific initiatives. Assessments evaluated clinical performance metrics, self-reported confidence in curricular topics, procedural and communication skills, resident satisfaction, and interdisciplinary attitudes. Results: Quantitative and qualitative data analyzed in three published works over the past 9 years of curricular programming has demonstrated highly satisfied learners along with improved: clinical performance; self-reported confidence in clinical topics, procedural, and communication skills; and interdisciplinary collegiality. Discussion: Purposeful focus on curricular development that integrates basic, clinical, and procedural content, while promoting the development of interdisciplinary relationships and the practice of critical thinking skills, is vital for successful education and patient care. This curriculum was well received by interns, covered difficult to obtain GME milestones, and provided an opportunity for interdisciplinary education. In an era of limited time for devoted bedside teaching and variable training exposures to certain disease processes, the development and implementation of this curriculum has filled a void within our system for unified resident education.

The Effect of Outcome Selection on the Performance of Prediction Models in Patients at Risk for Sepsis.

IMPORTANCE: Risk prediction models for patients with suspected sepsis have been derived on and applied to various outcomes, including readily available outcomes such as hospital mortality and ICU admission as well as longer-term mortality outcomes that may be more important to patients. It is unknown how selecting different outcomes influences model performance in patients at risk for sepsis. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the impact of outcome selection on risk model performance and weighting of individual predictor variables. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively analyzed adults hospitalized with suspected infection from January 2014 to September 2017 at 12 hospitals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used routinely collected clinical data to derive logistic regression models for four outcomes: hospital mortality, composite ICU length of stay greater than 72 hours or hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality. We compared the performance of the models using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration plots. RESULTS: Among 52,184 admissions, 2,030 (4%) experienced hospital mortality, 6,659 (13%) experienced the composite of hospital mortality or ICU length of stay greater than 72 hours, 3,417 (7%) experienced 30-day mortality, and 5,655 (11%) experienced 90-day mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves decreased when hospital-based models were applied to predict 30-day (hospital mortality = 0.88-0.85; -0.03, composite ICU length of stay greater than 72 hours or hospital mortality = 0.90-0.81; -0.09) and 90-day mortality (hospital mortality = 0.88-0.81; -0.07, composite ICU length of stay greater than 72 hours or hospital mortality = 0.90-0.76; -0.14; all p < 0.01). Models were well calibrated for derived (root-mean-square error = 5-15) but not alternate outcomes (root-mean-square error = 8-35). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Risk models trained to predict readily available hospital-based outcomes in suspected sepsis show poorer discrimination and calibration when applied to 30- and 90-day mortality. Interpretation and application of risk models for patients at risk of sepsis should consider these findings.

Presentation and outcomes of end stage liver disease patients presenting with septic shock to the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) are particularly vulnerable to sepsis. ESLD patients are often excluded from controlled sepsis trials and more data are needed to guide the management of this population. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical factors and outcomes of patients with ESLD presenting to the emergency department (ED) with septic shock. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients registered in our dedicated ED adult septic shock pathway. All patients registered between January 2014 and May 2016 were included. Clinical and treatment variables for ESLD patients were compared with non-ESLD patients. A second analysis assessed ESLD survivors compared to non-survivors. RESULTS: 2,584 septic shock patients were enrolled. ESLD was present in 6.2% (n = 161) of patients. Patients with ESLD had higher mortality compared to patients without ESLD 36.6% vs 21.2% (p < 0.001). ESLD patients were more likely to be younger, female, obese, and have other comorbidities. ESLD patients exhibited lower temperature, higher lactate, and higher incidence of acute kidney injury. There was no difference in antibiotics or fluid resuscitation between groups. ESLD patients received more ED vasopressor support. Among ESLD septic shock patients, maximum lactate and presence of pneumonia were independently associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESLD comprise a small but important subgroup of patients with ED septic shock that experience high mortality compared to patients without ESLD. Maximum ED lactate and pneumonia as the source of sepsis are independently associated with adverse outcome and may be used for early recognition of high-risk ESLD sepsis patients.

Structured, proactive care coordination versus usual care for Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS): a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality for patients with sepsis has recently declined, but sepsis survivors still suffer from significant long-term mortality and morbidity. There are limited data that support effective strategies to address post-discharge management of patients hospitalized with sepsis. METHODS: The Improving Morbidity during Post-Acute Care Transitions for Sepsis (IMPACTS) study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at three hospitals within a single healthcare delivery system comparing clinical outcomes between sepsis survivors who receive usual care versus care delivered through the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program. The STAR program includes a centrally located nurse navigator using telephone counseling and electronic health record-based support to facilitate best-practice post-sepsis care strategies for patients during hospitalization and the 30 days after hospital discharge, including post-discharge review of medications, evaluation for new impairments or symptoms, monitoring existing comorbidities, and palliative care referral when appropriate. Adults admitted through the Emergency Department with suspected infection (i.e., antibiotics initiated, bacterial cultures drawn) and deemed, by previously developed risk-stratification models, high risk for readmission or death are included. Eligible patients are randomly allocated 1:1 to either Arm 1, usual care or Arm 2, STAR. Planned enrollment is 708 patients during a 6-month period. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause hospital readmissions and mortality assessed 30 days post discharge. Secondary outcomes include 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, mortality, emergency department visits, acute care-free days alive, and acute care and total costs. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic evaluation provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of a strategy to improve delivery of recommended post-sepsis care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03865602. Registered retrospectively on 6 March 2019.

Predictive Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Hospital Mortality Decreases With Increasing Comorbidity Burden Among Patients Admitted for Suspected Infection.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the accuracy of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment tool to predict mortality across increasing levels of comorbidity burden. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Twelve acute care hospitals in the Southeastern United States. PATIENTS: A total of 52,187 patients with suspected infection presenting to the Emergency Department between January 2014 and September 2017. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was hospital mortality. We used electronic health record data to calculate quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment risk scores from vital signs and laboratory values documented during the first 24 hours. We calculated Charlson Comorbidity Index scores to quantify comorbidity burden. We constructed logistic regression models to evaluate differences in the performance of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment greater than or equal to 2 to predict hospital mortality in patients with no documented (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 0), low (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 1-2), moderate (Charlson Comorbidity Index = 3-4), or high (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5) comorbidity burden. Among the cohort, 2,030 patients died in the hospital (4%). No comorbidities were documented for 5,038 patients (10%), 9,235 patients (18%) had low comorbidity burden, 12,649 patients (24%) had moderate comorbidity burden, and 25,265 patients (48%) had high comorbidity burden. Overall model discrimination for quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment greater than or equal to 2 was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72). A model including both quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Charlson Comorbidity Index had improved discrimination compared with Charlson Comorbidity Index alone (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.76-0.78 vs area under the curve, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.59-0.62). Discrimination was highest among patients with no documented comorbidities (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84; 95% CI; 0.79-0.89) and lowest among high comorbidity patients (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65-0.68). The strength of association between quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and mortality ranged from 30.5-fold increased likelihood in patients with no comorbidities to 4.7-fold increased likelihood in patients with high comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment to predict hospital mortality diminishes with increasing comorbidity burden. Patients with comorbidities may have baseline abnormalities in quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment variables that reduce predictive accuracy. Additional research is needed to better understand quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment performance across different comorbid conditions with modification that incorporates the context of changes to baseline variables.

Simulation-based interdisciplinary education improves intern attitudes and outlook toward colleagues in other disciplines.

BACKGROUND: Cooperative interdisciplinary patient care is a modern healthcare necessity. While various medical and surgical disciplines have independent educational requirements, a system-wide simulation-based curriculum composed of different disciplines provides a unique forum to observe the effect of interdisciplinary simulation-based education (IDSE). Our hypothesis: IDSE positively affects intern outlook and attitudes towards other medical disciplines. METHODS: Using an established interdisciplinary simulation curriculum designed for first year interns, we explored the relative effect of IDSE on between-discipline intern attitudes in a convergent, parallel, mixed-methods study. Data sources included novel pre-post anonymous survey measurements (10-point Likert scale), focus groups, direct observations, and reflective field notes. This quasi-experimental pilot study was conducted at an academic, tertiary care medical center with two cohorts of interns: one exposed to IDSE and one exposed to an independent within-discipline simulation curriculum. RESULTS: IDSE exposed interns demonstrated statistically significant improvements when comparing mean pre-test and post-test score differences in five of seven areas: perceived interdisciplinary collegiality ([Formula: see text] = 0.855; p = 0.0002), respect (x̅ = 0.436; p = 0.0312), work interactions ([Formula: see text] = 0.691; p = 0.0069), perceived interdisciplinary attitudes (x̅ = 0.764; p = 0.0031), and comfort in interdisciplinary learning (x̅ = 1.164; p < 0.0001). There were no changes in interdisciplinary viewpoints observed among non-IDSE interns. IDSE interns were comfortable when learning with interns of different disciplines and believed others viewed their discipline positively compared to non-IDSE interns. Qualitative data uncovered the following themes related to the impact of IDSE including: 1) Relationship building, 2) Communication openness, 3) Attitude shifting, and 4) Enhanced learner experience. CONCLUSIONS: IDSE positively influenced intern outlook on and attitudes towards other medical disciplines. This unique learning environment provided interns an opportunity to learn clinical case management while learning about, from, and with each other; subsequently breaking traditional discipline-specific stereotypes and improving interdisciplinary relations. Future explicit focus on IDSE offers opportunity to improve interdisciplinary interactions and patient care.

A Mixed-methods Comparison of Participant and Observer Learner Roles in Simulation Education.

BACKGROUND: Traditional simulation-based education prioritizes participation in simulated scenarios. The educational impact of observation in simulation-based education compared with participation remains uncertain. Our objective was to compare the performances of observers and participants in a standardized simulation scenario. METHODS: We assessed learning differences between simulation-based scenario participation and observation using a convergent, parallel, quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study of 15 participants and 15 observers (N = 30). Fifteen first-year residents from six medical specialties were evaluated during a simulated scenario (cardiac arrest due to critical hyperkalemia). Evaluation included predefined critical actions and performance assessments. In the first exposure to the simulation scenario, participants and observers underwent a shared postevent debriefing with predetermined learning objectives. Three months later, a follow-up assessment using the same case scenario evaluated all 30 learners as participants. Wilcoxon signed rank and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare participants and observers at 3-month follow-up. In addition, we used case study methodology to explore the nature of learning for participants and observers. Data were triangulated using direct observations, reflective field notes, and a focus group. RESULTS: Quantitative data analysis comparing the learners' first and second exposure to the investigation scenario demonstrated participants' time to calcium administration as the only statistically significant difference between participant and observer roles (316 seconds vs. 200 seconds, p = 0.0004). Qualitative analysis revealed that both participation and observation improved learning, debriefing was an important component to learning, and debriefing closed the learning gap between observers and participants. CONCLUSIONS: Participants and observers had similar performances in simulation-based learning in an isolated scenario of cardiac arrest due to hyperkalemia. Findings support current limited literature that observation should not be underestimated as an important opportunity to enhance simulation-based education. When paired with postevent debriefing, scenario observers and participants may reap similar educational benefits.

Initial fluid resuscitation following adjusted body weight dosing is associated with improved mortality in obese patients with suspected septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal initial fluid resuscitation strategy for obese patients with septic shock is unknown. We evaluated fluid resuscitation strategies across BMI groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 4157 patients in a multicenter activation pathway for treatment of septic shock between 2014 and 2016. RESULTS: 1293 (31.3%) patients were obese (BMI≥30). Overall, higher BMI was associated with lower mortality, however this survival advantage was eliminated in adjusted analyses. Patients with higher BMI received significantly less fluid per kilogram at 3h than did patients with lower BMI (p≤0.001). In obese patients, fluid given at 3h mimicked a dosing strategy based on actual body weight (ABW) in 780 (72.2%), adjusted body weight (AdjBW) in 95 (8.8%), and ideal body weight (IBW) in 205 (19.0%). After adjusting for condition- and treatment-related variables, dosing based on AdjBW was associated with improved mortality compared to ABW (OR 0.45; 95% CI [0.19, 1.07]) and IBW (OR 0.29; 95% CI [0.11,0.74]). CONCLUSIONS: Using AdjBW to calculate initial fluid resuscitation volume for obese patients with suspected shock may improve outcomes compared to other weight-based dosing strategies. The optimal fluid dosing strategy for obese patients should be a focus of future prospective research.

Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Dialysis-Dependent End-Stage Renal Disease Patients with Emergency Department Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Infection is the second leading cause of death in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Prior investigations of acute septic shock in this specific population are limited. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation and factors associated with outcome among ESRD patients with acute septic shock. METHODS: We reviewed patients prospectively enrolled in an emergency department (ED) septic shock treatment pathway registry between January 2014 and May 2016. Clinical and treatment variables for ESRD patients were compared with non-ESRD patients. A second analysis focused on ESRD septic shock survivors and nonsurvivors. RESULTS: Among 4126 registry enrollees, 3564 (86.4%) met inclusion for the study. End-stage renal disease was present in 3.8% (n = 137) of ED septic shock patients. Hospital mortality was 20.4% and 17.1% for the ESRD and non-ESRD septic shock patient groups (p = 0.31). Septic shock patients with ESRD had a higher burden of chronic illness, but similar admission clinical profiles to non-ESRD patients. End-stage renal disease status was independently associated with lower fluid resuscitation dose, even when controlling for severity of illness. Age and admission lactate were independently associated with mortality in ESRD septic shock patients. CONCLUSION: ESRD patients comprise a small but important portion of patients with ED septic shock. Although presentation clinical profiles are similar to patients without ESRD, ESRD status is independently associated with lower fluid dose and compliance with the 30-mL/kg fluid goal. Hyperlactatemia is a marker of mortality in ESRD septic shock.

Factors Associated with Delayed Cooling in Cardiac Arrest Patients.

Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to improve neurologic outcome in medical cardiac arrest patients, yet little is known about factors that delay target temperature achievement. Our primary aim was to identify factors associated with not achieving our institutional "door-to-cool" (DTC) performance goal (emergency department [ED] arrival to temperature of 34°C) of ≤4 hours. Secondary aims included whether achievement of DTC goal was associated with timing of bolus neuromuscular blockade (NMB), survival, or functional outcome. This was a retrospective cohort study of a medical cardiac arrest quality improvement (QI) database that included patients treated from November 2007 to August 2012. The database was queried for patient demographics, arrest characteristics, specific cooling techniques used, whether patients underwent emergent computed tomography imaging or cardiac catheterization, and patient outcomes. Logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with DTC goal performance and outcomes. We enrolled 327 patients, median age 58, median return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) time of 21 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 14-29 minutes), and shockable initial rhythm in 61%. One hundred forty-four (44%) patients survived to hospital discharge, 133 (41%) with good functional outcome, as defined as cerebral performance category 1-2. Induction with cold IV fluids [OR 0.50 (CI: 0.29-0.85)] and NMB administration within 2 hours of ED arrival [OR 2.95 (CI: 1.17-7.43)] was associated with achieving DTC goal. Logistic regression showed that achievement of DTC goal ≤4 hours [OR 0.59 (0.32-1.09)] was not associated with good functional outcome. In our single-center cohort, initiation of cold intravenous fluids (IVF) and early NMB administration were associated with improved DTC goal performance of 4 hours. However, patients achieving DTC goals were not associated with improved outcomes.

Missed opportunities?: an evaluation of potentially preventable poisoning deaths.

INTRODUCTION: Although most poisoning deaths are not preventable with current medical technology, in some cases different management decisions may have prevented fatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review reported poisoning-related deaths for preventability to provide insight to improve future care. METHODS: Fatality abstracts published in the US National Poison Data System (NPDS) Annual Reports (2008-2012) were analyzed. Preventability was graded using a Likert scale of 1 (definitely non-preventable) to 6 (definitely preventable). Two medical toxicologists screened all cases. Cases deemed definitely not preventable (score 1) by both reviewers were excluded from further review and considered to be "non-preventable". All cases considered at least possibly preventable by either screener were reviewed by a multidisciplinary panel of 5 physicians for preventability scoring. Differences were resolved by consensus. Cases determined to be "preventable" (scores 4-6) were characterized by type of improvement issue involved (diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, other) and recurring scenarios. RESULTS: Of 390 published abstracts, 78 (20.0%) deaths were considered at least possibly preventable by at least one screener. Of these, 34 (8.7%) deaths were determined to be "preventable" by the panel. Inter-observer agreement by weighted kappa analysis was 0.58 for screening, 0.24 for preventability, and 0.44 for specific aspects of care. The most common toxicants were salicylates (n = 9), opioids (n = 4), toxic alcohols (n = 3), fluoride containing product (n = 3), and bupropion (n = 3). The most common improvement opportunities involved treatment and monitoring. DISCUSSION: Most of the ingested substances in preventable deaths have delayed GI absorption or require metabolic activation to produce a delayed effect (such as salicylates, opioids, and toxic alcohols), and therefore provide an opportunity for early recognition and successful interventions. Most improvement opportunities are clearly described in the literature but may be not recognized. CONCLUSIONS: Based on an analysis of published NPDS data, a considerable number of poisoning-related deaths reaching medical attention may be preventable. The most common scenarios involved in potentially preventable poisoning fatalities related to monitoring and treatment. Salicylates and opioids were the most common agents involved in preventable deaths.

Early neurologic examination is not reliable for prognostication in post-cardiac arrest patients who undergo therapeutic hypothermia.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in post-cardiac arrest (CA) care including therapeutic hypothermia (TH) have improved survival and favorable neurologic outcomes for survivors of CA. Survivors often present with deep coma and lack of brainstem reflexes, which are generally associated with adverse outcomes in many disease processes. Little is known regarding the role of initial emergency department (ED) neurological examination and its potential for prognostication. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine if components of a standardized neurologic examination are reliable prognosticators in patients recently resuscitated from CA. We hypothesize that lack of neurologic function does not reliably predict an adverse outcome and, therefore, should not be used to determine eligibility for TH. METHODS: A standardized neurologic examination was performed in the ED on a prospective, convenience cohort of post-CA patients presenting to a CA resuscitation center who would undergo a comprehensive postarrest care pathway that included TH. Data such as prior sedation or active neuromuscular blockade were documented to evaluate for the presence of possible confounders. Examination findings were then compared with hospital survival and neurologic outcome at discharge as defined by the cerebral performance category (CPC) score as documented in the institutional TH registry. RESULTS: Forty-nine subjects were enrolled, most of whom presented comatose with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 3 (n=41, 83.7%). Nineteen subjects (38.8%) had absence of all examination findings, of which 4 of 19 (21.1%) survived to hospital discharge. Of those with at least 1 positive examination finding, 13 of 30 subjects (43.3%) survived to hospital discharge. Subgroup analysis showed that 9 of the 19 patients with absence of brainstem reflexes did not have evidence of active neuromuscular blockade at the time of the examination; 2 of 9 (22.1%) survived to hospital discharge. Eight of these subjects in this group had not received any prior sedation; 1 of 8 (12.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Only 1 of the 17 subjects who survived was discharged with poor neurologic function with a CPC score=3, whereas all others who survived had good neurologic function, CPC score=1. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients treated in a comprehensive postarrest care pathway that included TH, absence of neurologic function on initial ED presentation was not reliable for prognostication. Given these findings, clinicians should refrain from using the initial ED neurological examination to guide the aggressiveness of care or in counseling of family members regarding anticipated outcome.

Outcomes in Cardiac Arrest Patients due to Toxic Exposure Treated with Therapeutic Hypothermia.

The incidence and outcome of patients who undergo therapeutic hypothermia (TH) after toxin-induced cardiac arrest (TICA) is not previously described. Our study aimed to describe the incidence, epidemiologic characteristics, and outcomes of patients who experience TICA in a dedicated clinical pathway for post-cardiac arrest care between November 2007 and February 2013. All patients were treated in an evidence-based clinical pathway that included TH. Database and medical records were independently reviewed by investigators to ascertain TICA. TICA was defined as cardiac arrest (CA) directly and immediately caused by a xenobiotic exposure. All patients were enrolled at Carolinas Medical Center, an urban 874-bed teaching hospital that serves as a regional cardiac resuscitation center. All patients were adult victims of cardiac arrest who had obtained return of spontaneous circulation and were enrolled in a clinical pathway for post-cardiac arrest care that included TH. Three hundred eighty-nine patients underwent treatment following CA during the study period and 48 (12 %) were deemed TICA. Patients who suffered TICA were slightly younger, less likely to have an initial shockable rhythm, and less likely to receive bystander CPR as compared to non-toxic cases. TICA accounted for a significant proportion of patients in this study. Additional, larger studies are needed to fully elucidate the optimal role for TH in TICA.