Evaluating Outcomes of Nonaccidental Trauma in Military Children.

BACKGROUND: Nonaccidental trauma (NAT), or child abuse, is a leading cause of childhood injury and death in the US. Studies demonstrate that military-affiliated individuals are at greater risk of mental health complication and family violence, including child maltreatment. There is limited information about the outcomes of military children who experience NAT. This study compares the outcomes between military-dependent and civilian children diagnosed with NAT. STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution, retrospective review of children admitted with confirmed NAT at a Level I trauma center was performed. Data were collected from the institutional trauma registry and the Child Abuse Team's database. Military affiliation was identified using insurance status and parental or caregiver self-reported active-duty status. Demographic and clinical data including hospital length of stay (LOS), morbidity, specialty consult, and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Among 535 patients, 11.8% (n = 63) were military-affiliated. The median age of military-associated patients, 3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1 to 7), was significantly younger than civilian patients, 7 months (IQR 3 to 18, p < 0.001). Military-affilif:ated patients had a longer LOS of 4 days (IQR 2 to 11) vs 2 days (IQR 1 to 7, p = 0.041), increased morbidity or complication (3 vs 2 counts, p = 0.002), and a higher mortality rate (10% vs 4%, p = 0.048). No significant difference was observed in the number of consults or injuries, trauma activation, or need for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Military-affiliated children diagnosed with NAT experience more adverse outcomes than civilian patients. Increased LOS, morbidity or complication, and mortality suggest military-affiliated patients experience more life-threatening NAT at a younger age. Larger studies are required to further examine this population and better support at-risk families.

Bike Helmet Usage in the Most Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: A Focused Area for Trauma Prevention.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data to describe how neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (NSD) correlates with childhood injuries and outcomes. This study assesses the relationship of NSD to bicycle safety and trauma outcomes among pediatric bicycle versus automobile injuries. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, patients ≤18 y old with bicycle versus automobile injuries from a Level I pediatric trauma center were evaluated. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to measure NSD. Patient demographics, injury, clinical data characteristics, and bike safety were analyzed. Traffic scene data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System were matched to clinical records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess demographic characteristics related to helmet usage. RESULTS: Among 321 patients, 84% were male with a median age of 12 y [interquartile range 9-13], and 44% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Hispanic ethnicity was greater in the most disadvantaged ADI groups (P < 0.001). Mortality occurred in two patients, and most (96%) were discharged home. Of Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System matched traffic records, 81% were at locations without a bike lane. No differences were found in GCS, intensive care unit admission, or length of stay by ADI. Hispanic ethnicity and the highest deprivation group were independently associated with lower odds of wearing a helmet (AOR 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9, P = 0.03; AOR 0.33 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.62; P = 0.001), while patient age and sex were unrelated to helmet usage. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for bike versus auto trauma remains similar across ADI groups. However, bike helmet usage is significantly lower among Hispanic children and those from neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage.