Risk Factors for HIV sero-conversion in a high incidence cohort of men who have sex with men and transgender women in Bangkok, Thailand.

BACKGROUND: We measured Human Immunodeficiency (HIV) incidence, retention, and assessed risk factors for seroconversion among two previously unreported cohorts of men who have sex with men (MSM) and Transgender Women (TGW) in Bangkok, Thailand between 2017 and 2019. METHODS: We conducted an 18-month prospective cohort study of HIV-uninfected Thai cisgender men and TGW aged between 18 and 35 years who reported sex with men in the past six months and at least one additional risk factor for HIV infection. HIV and syphilis testing and computer-based behavioral questionnaires were administered at each visit. We utilized Poisson regression to calculate HIV incidence rates. A survival random forest model identified the most predictive risk factors for HIV sero-conversion and then used in a survival regression tree model to elucidate hazard ratios for individuals with groups of selected risk factors. Cox proportional hazards (pH) regression evaluated the strength of association between individual covariates and risk of sero-conversion. FINDINGS: From April 2017-October 2019, 1,184 participants were screened, 167 were found ineligible, and 1,017 enrolled. Over the 18-month study, visit retention was 93·4% (95% CI 91·6%-94·8%) and HIV incidence was 3·73 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2·79-5·87). Utilizing survival regression tree modeling, those who were 18-20 years of age, reported sexual attraction to mostly or only men, and had five or more lifetime sexual partners were 4·9 times more likely to seroconvert compared to other cohort participants. Factors associated with HIV incidence utilizing Cox pH regression included sexual attraction to mostly or only men (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 14·9 (95% CI 20·1-107·9), younger age (18-19 years, aHR 10·88 (95% CI 4·12-28·7), five or greater lifetime sexual partners (aHR 2·0, 95%CI 1·1-3·6), inconsistent condom use with casual partners (aHR 2·43, 95% CI 1·3-4·5), and prior HIV testing (adjusted HR 2·0, 95% CI 1·1-3·5). INTERPRETATION: Interpretation HIV incidence remains high among Bangkok-based MSM and TGW. These key populations expressed high interest in participating in efficacy evaluation of future prevention strategies and had high retention in this 18 month study. FUNDING: Funding US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Division of AIDS Interagency Agreements (DAIDS) and U.S. Department of the Army.

Late boosting of the RV144 regimen with AIDSVAX B/E and ALVAC-HIV in HIV-uninfected Thai volunteers: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The RV144 phase 3 vaccine trial in Thailand demonstrated that ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and AIDSVAX B/E administration over 6 months resulted in a 31% efficacy in preventing HIV acquisition. In this trial, we assessed the immunological effect of an additional vaccine boost to the RV144 regimen at varying intervals between the priming vaccine series and the boost. METHODS: RV306 is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial done at three clinical sites in Thailand. Eligible volunteers were HIV-uninfected individuals aged 20-40 years who were at low risk for HIV infection and in good health. A randomisation schedule was centrally generated with fixed sized strata for Research Institute for Health Sciences Chiang Mai and combined Bangkok clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to one of five groups and then further randomly assigned to either vaccine or placebo. All participants received the primary RV144 vaccine series at months 0, 1, 3, and 6. Group 1 received no additional boost, group 2 received additional AIDSVAX B/E and ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) or placebo at month 12, group 3 received AIDSVAX B/E alone or placebo at month 12, group 4a received AIDSVAX B/E and ALVAC-HIV or placebo at month 15, and group 4b received AIDSVAX B/E and ALVAC-HIV or placebo at month 18. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability of these vaccination regimens and cellular and humoral immune responses compared between the RV144 series alone and regimens with late boosts at different timepoints. Safety and tolerability outcomes were assessed by evaluating local and systemic reactogenicity and adverse events in all participants. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01931358); clinical follow-up is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 28, 2013, and April 29, 2014, 367 participants were enrolled, of whom 27 were assigned active vaccination in group 1, 102 in group 2, 101 in group 3, 52 in group 4a, 51 in group 4b, and 34 combined placebo across all the groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were recorded. Occurrence and severity of local and systemic reactogenicity were similar across active groups. Groups with late boosts (groups 2, 3, 4a, and 4b) had increased peak plasma IgG-binding antibody levels against gp70 V1V2 relative to group 1 vaccine recipients with no late boost (gp70 V1V2 92TH023 adjusted p<0·02 for each; gp70 V1V2 CaseA2 adjusted p<0·0001 for each). Boosting at month 12 (groups 2 and 3) did not increase gp120 responses compared with the peak responses after the RV144 priming regimen at month 6; however, boosting at month 15 (group 4a) improved responses to gp120 A244gD- D11 (p=0·0003), and boosting at month 18 (group 4b) improved responses to both gp120 A244gD- D11 (p<0·0001) and gp120 MNgD- D11 (p=0·0016). Plasma IgG responses were significantly lower among vaccine recipients boosted at month 12 (pooled groups 2 + 3) than at month 15 (group 4a; adjusted p<0·0001 for each, except for gp70 V1V2 CaseA2, p=0·0142) and at month 18 (group 4b; all adjusted p<0·001). Boosting at month 18 versus month 15 resulted in a significantly higher plasma IgG response to gp120 antigens (all adjusted p<0·01) but not gp70 V1V2 antigens. CD4 functionality and polyfunctionality scores after stimulation with HIV-1 Env peptides (92TH023) increased with delayed boosting. Groups with late boosts had increased functionality and polyfunctionality scores relative to vaccine recipients with no late boost (all adjusted p<0·05, except for the polyfunctionality score in group 1 vs group 4b, p<0·01). INTERPRETATION: Taken together, these results suggest that additional boosting of the RV144 regimen with longer intervals between the primary vaccination series and late boost improved immune responses and might improve the efficacy of preventing HIV acquisition. FUNDING: US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and US Department of the Army.

HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials: RV144 and Beyond.

Despite progress in antiretroviral therapy, pre-exposure prophylaxis, microbicides, and other preventive strategies, a vaccine to prevent HIV-1 infection remains desperately needed. Development of an effective vaccine is challenged by several immunologic features of HIV-1 evidenced by the failure of five of the six HIV-1 candidate vaccine efficacy trials to date. This chapter reviews these efficacy trials with a focus on the Phase 3 RV144 trial in Thailand, the only HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial to show a moderate protective effect of 31% with respect to placebo administration. Although modest, this protection has allowed for the study of potential immunologic correlates of protection to improve development of future HIV-1 pox-protein and other vaccine strategies. Trials in Thailand and South Africa have built upon the RV144 framework to provide additional immunologic insights which enable current and future efficacy testing of related vaccine candidates.