Outcomes of Stroke Thrombectomy Performed by Interventional Radiologists versus Neurointerventional Physicians.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that interventional radiologists (IRs) and neurointerventional (NI) physicians have similar outcomes of endovascular stroke thrombectomy (EVT), which could be used to improve the availability of thrombectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hospitals providing EVT performed by IRs and NI physicians at the same institution submitted sequential retrospective data limited to the era of modern devices. Good clinical outcomes (a 90-day modified Rankin score [mRS] of 0-2) and technically successful revascularization (a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score of ≥2b) were compared between the specialties after adjusting for treating hospital, patient age, stroke severity, Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score, time from symptom onset to door, and clot location. Propensity score matching was used to compare the outcomes. A total of 1,009 patients were evaluated (622 treated by IRs and 387 treated by NI physicians). RESULTS: The median time from stroke onset to puncture was 245 versus 253 minutes (P = .49), the technically successful revascularization rate was 81.8% versus 82.4% (P = .81), and the good clinical outcome rate was 45.5% versus 50.1% (P = .16). After adjusting, the physician specialty was not a significant predictor of good clinical outcomes (odds ratio, 1.028; 95% confidence interval, 0.760-1.390; P = .86). After matching, an mRS of 0-2 was present in 47.7% of IR treated patients and 51.1% of NI treated patients (P = .366). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the successful revascularization rate and good clinical outcomes between IRs and NI physicians. The outcomes of EVT performed by IRs were similar to those of EVT performed by NI physicians, as determined using previously published trials and registries. This may be useful for addressing coverage and access to stroke interventions.

Cryoablation of sternal metastases for pain palliation and local tumor control.

PURPOSE: To determine safety and effectiveness of cryoablation of sternal metastases for pain palliation and local tumor control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A tumor ablation database was retrospectively reviewed for sternal cryoablation procedures performed between January 2005 and June 2013, which yielded 15 procedures to treat 12 sternal metastases in 12 patients (five men). Median patient age was 57 years (range, 38-80 y). Metastases arose from five primary sites (breast, lung, kidney, ampulla, and thyroid), and median tumor size was 3.8 cm (range, 2.2-7.5 cm). Seven patients (58%) underwent cryoablation for pain palliation, and five (42%) underwent cryoablation for local tumor control of oligometastatic disease. Clinical outcomes (including complications, local tumor control, and pain response) were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean pain scores decreased from 7.0 ± 1.9 (median, 7; range, 4-10) at baseline to 1.8 ± 1.2 (median, 1.5; range, 0-4) following cryoablation (P = .00049). Two patients had durable pain palliation, and four had greater than 1 month of pain relief, with a median duration of 5.7 months (range, 1.5-14.7 mo). Two patients in whom recurrent pain developed underwent repeat cryoablation, with durable pain relief. Allowing for a single repeat treatment, local tumor control was achieved in four of five patients (80%) treated for this indication, with median follow-up of 8.4 months (range, 2.6-13.6 mo). In one patient (8%), an infectious complication developed that was successfully treated with antibiotics on an outpatient basis. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation is a safe and potentially effective treatment for patients with painful sternal metastases and can achieve local tumor control in select patients.

Ultrasound-guided transhepatic radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: a safe and effective approach.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided transhepatic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of masses in the right kidney. METHODS: Between June 2001 and December 2011, 18 patients who underwent transhepatic renal RFA procedures to treat 19 tumors were retrospectively identified. Complications (Clavien-Dindo classification system) and local tumor control were evaluated for all patients. RESULTS: Median maximal diameter of the treated renal tumors was 1.9 (range 1.1-4.3) cm. No major complication developed during any of the procedures. No hepatic tumor seeding was identified during imaging follow-up. There was a single technical failure (5.3%). Median cross-sectional imaging follow-up was 28 (range 3-121) months. Primary technique failure (local recurrence) occurred in 1 of the 16 tumors with follow-up imaging (5.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous ultrasound-guided transhepatic RFA of renal neoplasms is technically feasible, effective, and associated with a low rate of complications. The transhepatic approach may allow safe ablation of renal tumors that would otherwise be difficult to treat.

Percutaneous renal cryoablation after partial nephrectomy: technical feasibility, complications and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Treatment of locally recurrent or de novo tumors in the ipsilateral kidney after partial nephrectomy represents a management dilemma. Percutaneous renal cryoablation offers a minimally invasive treatment option in such cases. We review our single institution experience with percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors after partial nephrectomy for technical feasibility, complications and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2003 and January 2012, 48 patients underwent percutaneous cryoablation for the treatment of 68 ipsilateral renal tumors after previous partial nephrectomy. Oncologic outcomes, complications (Clavien-Dindo classification system) and renal function were evaluated. RESULTS: Median maximal diameter of the treated renal tumors was 2.5 cm (range 1.2 to 5.4). All cryoablation procedures were considered technically successful. Of the 54 biopsy proven or suspected renal cell carcinomas with 3 or more months of computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging followup after cryoablation (median 19, range 3 to 61), 5 cases (9.3%) had local tumor recurrence. Major (grade 3 or greater) complications developed after 3 (5.7%) cryoablation procedures and there were no perioperative deaths. Median change in patient estimated glomerular filtration rate after renal cryoablation was -1.5 ml per minute. No patients required dialysis in the perioperative period, while 2 with stage 4 chronic kidney disease at the time of ablation became dialysis dependent at 5 and 23 months after treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous renal cryoablation after ipsilateral partial nephrectomy is technically feasible, has a low rate of major complications, provides relative preservation of renal function and demonstrates acceptable short-term oncologic outcomes in this challenging population.

Statin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is associated with lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate in patients with giant cell arteritis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and statins may impact erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients. The current study was performed to determine if NSAID or statin use is associated with lower ESR and CRP in patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted that included 161 patients via chart review. Charts of patients with GCA seen at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics from 1960 to 2008 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adequate medication records, serum ESR and/or CRP on record, no prior corticosteroid use, and biopsy-positive GCA. Exclusion criteria were the presence of diseases known to elevate ESR or CRP. Main outcome measures included ESR and CRP values measured while evaluating patients for GCA but prior to receiving treatment. RESULTS: Statin nonusers had an ESR of 85.0 mm per hour (interquartile range [IQR] = 60-110 mm per hour) and a CRP of 8.7 mg/dL (IQR = 2.7-16.2 mg/dL). Statin users had an ESR of 57.5 mm per hour (IQR = 35-85) and a CRP of 2.4 mg/dL (IQR = 0.8-15.9 mg/dL). Statin use was associated with a lower ESR (P = 0.005), while there was no significant association with a lower CRP (P = 0.127). NSAID nonusers had an ESR of 98.0 mm per hour (IQR = 64-116) and a CRP of 8.7 mg/dL (IQR = 2.1-16.2 mg/dL). NSAID users had an ESR of 75.0 mm per hour (IQR = 46-98.5 mm per hour) and CRP of 8.0 mg/dL (IQR. = 1.5-16.2 mg/dL). NSAID use was associated with a lower ESR (P = 0.004), but there was no significant association with a lower CRP (P = 0.522). CONCLUSION: Statin use and NSAID use were associated with a lower ESR; however, they were not associated with lower CRP values. Clinicians should be aware that statin or NSAID use is associated with lower ESR in patients with GCA, and this test may therefore have lower sensitivity and specificity for recognizing patients with GCA, and CRP may be a superior test to evaluate patients for GCA.