Shifting landscapes: the role of 3D genomic organizations in gene regulatory strategies.

3D genome folding enables the physical storage of chromosomes into the compact volume of a cell's nucleus, allows for the accurate segregation of chromatin to daughter cells, and has been shown to be tightly coupled to the way in which genetic information is converted into transcriptional programs [1-3]. Importantly, this link between chromatin architecture and gene regulation is a selectable feature in which modifications to chromatin organization accompany, or perhaps even drive the establishment of new regulatory strategies with enduring impacts on animal body plan complexity. Here, we discuss the nature of different 3D genome folding systems found across the tree of life, with particular emphasis on metazoans, and the relative influence of these systems on gene regulation. We suggest how the properties of these folding systems have influenced regulatory strategies employed by different lineages and may have catalyzed the partitioning and specialization of genetic programs that enabled multicellularity and organ-grade body plan complexity.

Two potential evolutionary origins of the fruiting bodies of the dictyostelid slime moulds.

Dictyostelium discoideum and the other dictyostelid slime moulds ('social amoebae') are popular model organisms best known for their demonstration of sorocarpic development. In this process, many cells aggregate to form a multicellular unit that ultimately becomes a fruiting body bearing asexual spores. Several other unrelated microorganisms undergo comparable processes, and in some it is evident that their multicellular development evolved from the differentiation process of encystation. While it has been argued that the dictyostelid fruiting body had similar origins, it has also been proposed that dictyostelid sorocarpy evolved from the unicellular fruiting process found in other amoebozoan slime moulds. This paper reviews the developmental biology of the dictyostelids and other relevant organisms and reassesses the two hypotheses on the evolutionary origins of dictyostelid development. Recent advances in phylogeny, genetics, and genomics and transcriptomics indicate that further research is necessary to determine whether or not the fruiting bodies of the dictyostelids and their closest relatives, the myxomycetes and protosporangids, are homologous.