Routine use of color Doppler in fetal heart scanning in a low-risk population.

Objectives. To investigate the detection rate of major fetal heart defects in a low-risk population implementing routine use of color Doppler. Material and Methods. In a prospective observational study, all women undergoing fetal heart scanning (including 6781 routine examinations in the second trimester) during a three-year period were included. First a gray-scale scanning was performed including assessment of the four-chamber view and the great vessels. Thereafter three cross-sectional planes through the fetal thorax were assessed with color Doppler. Results. Thirty-nine fetuses had major heart defects, and 26 (67%) were prenatally detected. In 9/26 (35%) of cases the main ultrasound finding was related to the use of color Doppler. The survival rate of live born children was 91%. Conclusions. Routine use of color Doppler in fetal heart scanning in a low-risk population may be helpful in the detection of major heart defects; however, still severe malformations were missed prenatally.

Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?

OBJECTIVE: To compare elements of the Bishop score and corresponding sonographic measurements before induction of labor, and assess how predictive factors can be used in a clinical setting. DESIGN: Prospective comparative clinical study. SETTING: Secondary referral center, university hospital. POPULATION: A total of 275 women scheduled for induction of labor. METHODS: Fetal head descent to the perineum was assessed with transperineal ultrasound. Cervical length, posterior angle, and dilatation were evaluated with transvaginal ultrasound followed by Bishop score without knowledge of the ultrasound measurements. RESULTS: Univariable regression analyses of successful induction were significant for digital assessment of cervical dilatation, ultrasound measured fetal head-perineum distance < or =40 mm, ultrasound measured cervical length < or =25 mm, and ultrasound measured posterior cervical angle >90 degrees. After adjusting for maternal factors in a multivariable model, estimates were significant for previous vaginal birth (OR 5.3; 95% CI 2.1-13.9, p<0.01), but borderline for maternal height (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2, p=0.01) and ultrasound measured posterior cervical angle >90 degrees (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.1-6.1, p=0.03). A scoring model combining ultrasound measured fetal head-perineum distance, cervical length, cervical posterior angle and digitally assessed cervical dilatation, discriminated successful and failed induction at 71% (95% CI 61-80%, p<0.01) area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. CONCLUSION: Digital assessment of fetal head descent, cervical length and position can possibly be replaced with ultrasound measurements. Dilatation is best evaluated with digital assessment. Combination of these four factors can predict success of labor induction.