Changes in reward-induced neural activity upon Cafeteria Diet consumption.

Excessive consumption of highly palatable foods rich in sugar and fat, often referred to as "junk" or "fast" foods, plays a central role in the development of obesity. The highly palatable characteristics of these foods activate hedonic and motivational mechanisms to promote food-seeking behavior and overeating, which is largely regulated by the brain reward system. Excessive junk food consumption can alter the functioning of this reward system, but exact mechanisms of these changes are still largely unknown. This study investigated whether long-term junk food consumption, in the form of Cafeteria (CAF) diet, can alter the reward system in adult, female Long-Evans rats, and whether different regimes of CAF diet influence the extent of these changes. To this end, rats were exposed to a 6-week diet with either standard chow, or ad libitum daily access to CAF diet, 30 % restricted but daily access to CAF diet, or one-day-a-week (intermittent) ad libitum access to CAF diet, after which c-Fos expression in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc), Prefrontal Cortex (PFC), and Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA) following consumption of a CAF reward of choice was examined. We found that all CAF diet regimes decreased c-Fos expression in the NAc-shell when presented with a CAF reward, while no changes in c-Fos expression upon the different diet regimes were found in the PFC, and possibly the VTA. Our data suggests that long-term junk food exposure can affect the brain reward system, resulting in an attenuated activity of the NAc-shell.

Validation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire in a large sample of Dutch achalasia patients.

SUMMARY: The aim of this study was to validate a translated version of an achalasia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (achalasia-DSQoL) by examining its psychometric properties in a Dutch cohort of achalasia patients. The achalasia-DSQoL was administered to 171 treated achalasia patients together with a clinical symptom score and the RAND-36. Validation methods included factor analysis, known-group techniques, Cronbach's alpha and Spearman rank correlation with other questionnaires and feasibility. About 72.5% of the achalasia patients completed the questionnaires. The achalasia-DSQoL showed evidence of an underlying construct and seems reliable with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.77. The question concerning heartburn did not correlate with the other items on the questionnaire. Known-group techniques demonstrated that the achalasia-DSQoL discriminates between achalasia patients in clinical remission and patients who are not. There was a moderate correlation between the achalasia-DSQoL and the RAND-36 subscales. The questionnaire was easy in use. The translated version of the achalasia-DSQoL is a valid and reliable instrument to compare groups of achalasia patients although the question concerning heartburn should be excluded.

Persisting symptoms and decreased health-related quality-of-life in a cross-sectional study of treated achalasia patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about symptom characteristics of treated achalasia patients and their effect on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). AIMS: To examine clinical remission, achalasia-associated symptoms and HRQoL in treated achalasia patients. METHODS: The Eckardt clinical symptom score, RAND-36 and a disease-specific HRQoL questionnaire were sent to 171 treated achalasia patients. RESULTS: 76.6% of the patients returned their questionnaire. 44.9% of them were not in symptomatic remission. Prevalence of frequent dysphagia (at least daily) and chest pain (at least weekly) was 46% and 38%, respectively. Achalasia patients had lower general HRQoL scores than control subjects (all RAND-36 subscales, except health change; P < or = 0.002). Patients with frequent symptoms of chest pain and dysphagia showed lower HRQoL than patients with less frequent symptoms on three RAND-36 subscales (pain, social functioning and general health perceptions; P < 0.003). Patients in clinical remission showed higher HRQoL than patients who were not, however HRQoL in the 'remission group' remained significantly impaired as compared to controls (all RAND-36 subscales except emotional role limitations and mental health; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many achalasia patients remain severely symptomatic after treatment and have decreased HRQoL. Frequent symptoms are associated with lower HRQoL. Patients in clinical remission show substantially improved, but not restored HRQoL.