A systematic review of personality and musculoskeletal disorders: evidence from general population studies.

Introduction: We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the quality and extent of evidence on associations between personality disorders (PDs) and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in population-based studies, since these disorders are leading causes of disease burden worldwide. Methods: A search strategy of published, peer-reviewed and gray literature was developed in consultation with a liaison librarian and implemented for Embase, CINAHL Complete, Medline Complete, and PsycINFO via the EBSCOhost platform from 1990 to the present and CORDIS and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, respectively. The inclusion criteria were as follows: I) general population participants aged ≥15 years; II) self-report, probable PD based on positive screen, or threshold PD according to the DSM-IV/5 (groupings: any, Clusters A/B/C, specific PD) or ICD-10/11; III) MSDs identified by self-report or ICD criteria (arthritis, back/neck conditions, fibromyalgia, osteopenia/osteoporosis) and III) cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional study designs. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted the data. Critical appraisal was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists for systematic reviews of etiology and risk. A descriptive synthesis presents the characteristics of included studies, critical appraisal results, and descriptions of the main findings. This review adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results: There were 11 peer-reviewed, published articles included in this review (n = 9 cross-sectional and n = 2 case-control studies); participants were ≥18 years in these studies. No published gray literature was identified. Semi-structured interviews were the most common method to ascertain PDs; all studies utilized self-reported measures to identify MSDs. Overall, we detected limited and conflicting evidence for associations between PDs and MSDs. Discussion: The main result may be explained by lack of population-based longitudinal evidence, heterogenous groupings of PD, and few comparable cross-sectional and case-control studies. Strengths of the review include a comprehensive search strategy and a discussion of mechanisms underlying possible associations between PDs and MSDs. Conclusions: The quality of most studies included in this review that examined associations between PD and MSDs in general population adults was high. However, the results demonstrated limited and conflicting evidence for these associations, in part, due to lack of comparable evidence, which should be addressed in future research. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021243094.

Lithium use and bone health in women with bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Several psychiatric disorders and medications used to treat them appear to be independently associated with skeletal deficits. As there is increasing evidence that lithium possesses skeletal protective properties, we aimed to investigate the association between lithium use and bone health in a group of women with bipolar disorder. METHOD: Women with bipolar disorder (n = 117, 20+ years) were recruited from south-eastern Australia. Bipolar disorder was confirmed using a clinical interview (SCID-I/NP). Bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2 ) was measured at the spine, hip and total body using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and low bone mass determined by BMD T-score of <-1.0. Weight and height were measured, socioeconomic status (SES) determined and information on medication use and lifestyle factors self-reported. Linear and logistic regression were used to test associations between lithium and (i) BMD and (ii) low bone mass, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-five (29.9%) women reported current lithium use. Lithium users and non-users differed in regard to SES and BMD; otherwise, groups were similar. After adjustments, mean BMD among lithium users was 5.1% greater at the spine (1.275 [95% CI 1.229-1.321] vs. 1.214 [1.183-1.244] g/cm2 , p = 0.03), 4.2% greater at the total hip (0.979 [0.942-1.016] vs. 0.938 [0.910-0.966] g/cm2 , p = 0.03) and 2.2% greater at the total body (1.176 [1.148-1.205] vs. 1.150 [1.129-1.171] g/cm2 , p = 0.08) compared to participants not receiving lithium. Lithium users were also less likely to have low bone mass (22.9% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.031). Associations persisted after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION: These data suggest lithium is associated with greater BMD and reduced risk of low bone mass in women with bipolar disorder. Research into the underlying mechanisms is warranted.

Comparing self-reports to national register data in the detection of disabling mental and musculoskeletal disorders among ageing women.

BACKGROUND: Self-reports of diseases are used in research due to time and cost efficiency. Mental disorders (MDs) and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are the leading causes of global disability. AIMS: To investigate how self-reports detect physician-diagnosed severe MDs and MSDs in postmenopausal women. METHODS: In the population-based OSTPRE cohort, 1466 women (aged 57-66) had received a permanent work disability pension (DP) due to 'MDs only' (n = 336), 'MSDs only' (n = 926) or 'MDs + MSDs' (n = 204) by the end of 1998 and responded to a postal enquiry in 1999. In 2009, 1029 women responded to a follow-up enquiry. Self-reports were cross-checked against register data on DPs. RESULTS: In 1999, 47 % of the participants in the 'MDs only' and 21 % in the 'MDs + MSDs' reported DPs due to MDs, whereas 75 % in the 'MSDs only' and 67 % in the 'MDs + MSDs' reported DPs due to MSDs. By 2009, this discrepancy increased, with the respective figures being 34 % and 19 % for MDs and 75 % for both MSDs groups. In 1999, older age was related to non-reporting in the three groups (each: p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Self-reports grossly underestimate the prevalence of disabling MDs and considerably that of MSDs among ageing women. Thus, additional sources of information are needed.

Bipolar disorder and bone health: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with significant psychological and physical comorbidity. Yet little is known about the bone health of individuals with BD. Thus, we aimed to investigate the association between BD and bone health in a population-based sample of women. METHODS: Women with a history of BD (cases; n = 117) were recruited from public and private health care settings and controls, without BD, were drawn from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (n = 909). BD was identified using a semi-structured clinical interview (SCID-I/NP). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the spine, femoral neck and total body using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and bone quality by quantitative heel ultrasound and included the following parameters: Speed of Sound (SOS), Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness Index (SI). Weight and height were measured and information on medication use and lifestyle was obtained. RESULTS: Adjusted mean BMD among the cases was 4.3% lower at the hip and 1.6% lower at the total body compared to controls. Age was an effect modifier at the spine. Among women <50 years, mean spine BMD for cases was 3.5% lower than controls. No differences in spine BMD for those ≥50 years were detected. Cases also had a 1.0%, 3.2% and 7.8% lower adjusted mean SOS, BUA and SI compared to controls, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Course, chronicity and recovery of BD were not explored in relation to bone health. CONCLUSION: These data suggest BD is associated with low bone quantity and quality in women. Replication and research into underlying mechanisms is warranted.

Exploring the comorbidity between personality and musculoskeletal disorders among adults: A scoping review.

Introduction: There is growing awareness of the comorbidity between mental and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and their associated burden. We aimed to explore what is known regarding the existing epidemiological clinical-and population- based literature on the comorbidity between personality disorders (PDs) and MSDs specifically. In addition, we aimed to investigate their associated burden by examining a range of outcomes including morbidity/mortality, patient- and clinical-reported outcomes, work-related outcomes, hospital admissions, and financial costs. Finally, we sought to identify gaps in the literature and provide recommendations for further research. Methods: Studies with participants 15 years of age were eligible. Categorical PDs/features (DSM-III/IV/5 or ICD 9/10), identified by a health care professional, medical records, diagnostic interviews, or self-administered questionnaires. The definitions/groupings of MSDs were guided by the ICD-10 including conditions of the back, joints, and soft tissue, and disorders of bone density and structure. Published peer-reviewed and gray literature were considered. Eligible study designs were cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies, and existing reviews of observational studies. Identification and selection of articles, data extraction and the presentation of the results was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Results: In total, 57 articles were eligible including 10 reviews and 47 individual studies. Across clinical and population settings, we detected evidence of comorbidity between PDs and chronic back/neck/spine conditions, arthritis, and fibromyalgia, and emerging evidence of associations between PDs and reduced bone mineral density. In terms of knowledge gaps, the burden associated with PDs and MSDs is poorly understood, as is their underlying mechanisms. Discussion: This scoping review might prompt further research into PDs and MSDs as separate groups of disorders, along with their comorbidity and the mechanisms that may link them. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/mxbr2/registrations.

Associations between personality and musculoskeletal disorders in the general population: A systematic review protocol.

There is growing evidence of the comorbidity between personality disorder (PD) and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). However, there are no systematic reviews including critical appraisal and meta-analyses that identify, evaluate, and synthesize the available evidence on these associations. Therefore, we present here a protocol of the methodology to undertake a systematic review, with the objective to evaluate associations between PD and MSDs in epidemiological population-based studies. A systematic review of observational studies will be conducted. A complete search strategy will be developed in consultation with a health librarian. To identify peer-reviewed literature, the search will be translated for, and implemented in Medline Complete, CINAHL Complete, and PsycINFO via the EBSCOhost platform from 1990 to the present. Gray literature will be identified. Studies will be eligible if they examine general population participants aged 15 years and over. Associations of interest are the presence of threshold or positive screen according to the DSM-V/5 (groupings: any, Clusters A, B, C, specific PD) or ICD-10 for PD in relation to arthritis, back/neck conditions, fibromyalgia, osteopenia/osteoporosis, and/or "any" of these MSDs. Data extraction and critical appraisal will be conducted in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for systematic reviews of etiology and risk. The results from all studies will be presented in tables, text, and figures. A descriptive synthesis will present the characteristics of included studies, critical appraisal results, and descriptions of the main findings. Where appropriate, meta-analyses will be performed. If heterogeneity (e.g., I 2 = 50%) is detected, subgroup/sensitivity analysis may be used to explore the possible sources. The systematic review does not require ethics approval. The proposed systematic review will strengthen the evidence base on what is known regarding associations between PD and MSDs by identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the findings of existing observational studies including meta-analyses, where appropriate.

Exploring the comorbidity of musculoskeletal and personality disorders among adults: a scoping review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Separately, mental and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are prevalent across the life course and are leading contributors to disability worldwide. While people with personality disorder (PD) have been shown to have an increased risk of certain physical health comorbidities-associations with MSDs have not been thoroughly explored. The proposed scoping review aims to explore the existing clinical- and population-based literature on the comorbidity of PD and MSDs among adults ≥ 18 years and the burden associated with their comorbidity, identify knowledge gaps on this topic, and propose recommendations for future research. METHODS: This protocol describes the methodology to undertake the scoping review. It is guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the extensions recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. A comprehensive search strategy will be used to identify relevant articles, which will be underpinned by Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) inclusion criteria. One author will perform the search and two authors will independently screen titles/abstracts followed by a full-text review for articles considered relevant. The supervising author will confirm the final selection of articles to be included. One author will extract relevant information from the articles using a predetermined charting form, while a second will perform validation of all information entered. DISCUSSION: Information will be synthesised to inform a discussion of what is known regarding associations between PD and MSDs, and the burden associated with their comorbidity in different contexts, with future research directions proposed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This protocol is registered in Open Science Framework Registries ( https://osf.io/mxbr2/ ).

Personality Disorder and Physical Health Comorbidities: A Link With Bone Health?

We examined whether personality disorders (PDs) (any, cluster A/B/C) were associated with bone mineral density (BMD) in a population-based sample of Australian women (n = 696). Personality and mood disorders were assessed using semi-structured diagnostic interviews. BMD was measured at the spine, hip, and total body using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (GE-Lunar Prodigy). Anthropometrics, medication use, physical conditions, and lifestyle factors were documented. The association between PDs (any, cluster A/B/C) and BMD (spine/hip/total body) was examined with multiple linear regression models. The best models were identified by backward elimination including age, weight, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, dietary calcium intake, mood disorders, physical multimorbidity, socioeconomic status, and medications affecting bone. The variables were retained in the model if p < 0.05. All potential interactions in final models were tested. Those with cluster A PD, compared to those without, had 6.7% lower hip BMD [age, weight adjusted mean 0.853 (95% CI 0.803-0.903) vs. 0.910 (95% CI 0.901-0.919) g/cm2, p = 0.027] and 3.4% lower total body BMD [age, weight, smoking, alcohol, calcium adjusted mean 1.102 (95% CI 1.064-1.140) vs. 1.139 (95% CI 1.128-1.150) g/cm2, p = 0.056]. No associations were observed between cluster B/C PDs and hip/total body BMD or between any of the PD clusters and spine BMD. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the bone health of women with PD in a population-based sample. Given the paucity of literature, replication and longitudinal research including the examination of underlying mechanisms and sex differences are warranted.

Depressive disorders, anxiety disorders and subjective mental health in common musculoskeletal diseases: A review.

Globally, musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs) and mental disorders are the leading causes of disability, but their mutual relationships have been little studied. The objective of the current review is to summarize the evidence on the relationships between depressive and anxiety disorders, subjective mental health and common MSDs in adults aged 45 years and over. A review of studies published in English, identified using MEDLINE, was conducted. Search terms included spinal stenosis, intervertebral disc displacement, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, mental health, subjective well-being, subjective quality of life, life satisfaction and personal satisfaction. A total of 287 records were initially identified, and an additional 190 records were identified from their reference lists. Eight studies were considered eligible and were, thus, included in the current review. The included studies reported that: 1) major depressive disorder is associated with chronic back pain; 2) anxiety disorders are associated with cervical or lumbar disc herniation; 3) mood and anxiety disorders are associated with lower bone mineral density in men; 4) life satisfaction and its improvement prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women; and 5) quality of life reduces progressively as the number of osteoporotic fractures increases. In conclusion, common MSDs are associated with mental disorders and subjective mental health in adults aged 45 years or more, but longitudinal research is needed.