Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Addiction ; 117(6): 1683-1691, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35072314

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate the real-world effectiveness of pharmacological treatments (buprenorphine, methadone) of opioid use disorder (OUD). DESIGN: A nation-wide, register-based cohort study. SETTING: Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: All residents aged 16-64 years living in Sweden using OUD medication from July 2005 to December 2016 (n = 5757, 71.8% men) were identified from registers of prescriptions, inpatient and specialized outpatient care, causes of death, sickness absence and disability pensions. MEASUREMENTS: Main outcome: hospitalization due to OUD. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: hospitalization due to any cause; death due to all, natural and external causes. Mortality was analyzed with between-individual multivariate-adjusted Cox hazards regression model. Recurrent outcomes, such as hospitalizations, were analyzed with within-individual analyses to eliminate selection bias. OUD medication use versus non-use was modelled with PRE2DUP (from prescription drug purchases to drug use periods) method. FINDINGS: Buprenorphine [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54-0.97] and methadone (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59-0.93) use were associated with significantly lower risk of OUD hospitalization, but not any-cause hospitalizations, compared with the time-periods when the same individual did not use OUD medication. The use of buprenorphine and methadone were both associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.34-0.59; HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41-0.63, respectively), compared with non-use of both medications. Similar results were found for risk of mortality due to external causes (HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.27-0.54; HR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.29-0.53, respectively), but not for mortality due to natural causes. The risk of OUD hospitalization and all-cause mortality was decreased in all duration categories of studied medications (< 30, 31-180, 181-365 and >365 days), except for methadone use less than 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The use of buprenorphine and methadone are both associated with a significantly lower risk of hospitalization due to opioid use disorder and death due to all and external causes, when compared with non-use.


Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/reabilitação
2.
Addiction ; 116(8): 1990-1998, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33394527

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder (AUD) is recommendable, but under-used, possibly due to deficient knowledge of medications. This study aimed to investigate the real-world effectiveness of approved pharmacological treatments (disulfiram, acamprosate, naltrexone and nalmefene) of AUD. DESIGN: A nation-wide, register-based cohort study. SETTING: Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: All residents aged 16-64 years living in Sweden with registered first-time treatment contact due to AUD from July 2006 to December 2016 (n = 125 556, 62.5% men) were identified from nation-wide registers. MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was hospitalization due to AUD. The secondary outcomes were hospitalization due to any cause, alcohol-related somatic causes, as well as work disability (sickness absence or disability pension), and death. Mortality was analysed with between-individual analysis using a traditional multivariate-adjusted Cox hazards regression model. Recurrent outcomes, such as hospitalization-based events and work disability, were analysed with within-individual analyses to eliminate selection bias. FINDINGS: Naltrexone combined with acamprosate [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.89], combined with disulfiram (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60-0.96) and as monotherapy (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81-0.97) was associated with a significantly lower risk of AUD-hospitalization compared with no use of AUD medication. Similar results were found for risk of hospitalization due to any cause. Benzodiazepine use and acamprosate monotherapy were associated with an increased risk of AUD-hospitalization (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14-1.22 and HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04-1.17, respectively). No statistically significant effects were found for work disability or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Naltrexone as monotherapy and when combined with disulfiram and acamprosate appears to be associated with lower risk of hospitalization due to any and alcohol-related causes, compared with no use of alcohol use disorder (AUD) medication. Acamprosate monotherapy and benzodiazepine use appear to be associated with increased risk of AUD-associated hospitalization.


Assuntos
Dissuasores de Álcool , Alcoolismo , Acamprosato/uso terapêutico , Dissuasores de Álcool/uso terapêutico , Alcoolismo/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Naltrexona/uso terapêutico , Suécia/epidemiologia
3.
Crit Care ; 14(6): R205, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21078153

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This prospective study investigated the predictive value of procalcitonin (PCT) for survival in 242 adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated in intensive care. METHODS: PCT was analyzed from blood samples of all patients at baseline, and 155 patients 72 hours later. RESULTS: The median PCT serum concentration on day 0 was 5.0 ng/ml (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0 and 20.1 ng/ml) and 1.3 ng/ml (IQR 0.5 and 5.8 ng/ml) 72 hours later. Hospital mortality was 25.6% (62/242). Median PCT concentrations in patients with community-acquired infections were higher than with nosocomial infections (P = 0.001). Blood cultures were positive in 28.5% of patients (n = 69), and severe sepsis with positive blood cultures was associated with higher PCT levels than with negative cultures (P = < 0.001). Patients with septic shock had higher PCT concentrations than patients without (P = 0.02). PCT concentrations did not differ between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors (P = 0.64 and P = 0.99, respectively), but mortality was lower in patients whose PCT concentration decreased > 50% (by 72 hours) compared to those with a < 50% decrease (12.2% vs. 29.8%, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: PCT concentrations were higher in more severe forms of severe sepsis, but a substantial concentration decrease was more important for survival than absolute values.


Assuntos
Calcitonina/antagonistas & inibidores , Precursores de Proteínas/antagonistas & inibidores , Sepse/sangue , Sepse/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Calcitonina/sangue , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Precursores de Proteínas/sangue , Sepse/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...