Is nail-plate docking worth the effort? A biomechanical analysis of docking a plate and a nail in peri-implant femur fractures.

Purpose: The ideal treatment of peri-implant femur fractures (PIFFs) remains unclear due to the thin clinical and biomechanical evidence concerning the most suitable form of osteosynthesis. The purpose of the present study was thus to determine the biomechanical stability that results from combining a cephalomedullary nail and a plate for proximal PIFFs, especially when the nail-plate docking technique is applied. Methods: Twenty four PIFFs were simulated in both 12 foam and 12 composite specimens and were stabilized via a combination of a cephalomedullary nail and a plate. The control group (n = 6) had a nail and a plate without a connection, while the intervention group (n = 6) had a screw that connected the plate with the interlocking screw hole of the nail, thereby creating a nail-plate docking system. The specimens were evaluated under axial and torsional loading using a material-testing machine and a 3D metrology system. Results: The data regarding stiffness, failure load, and failure displacement showed significantly higher stability for specimens without nail-plate docking. For docked specimens, a non-significant trend toward a higher resistance to torque was observed. Both techniques displayed no significant difference in fracture gap displacement or total displacement. Conclusion: The present study suggests that nail-plate docking of a cephalomedullary nail, and a plate significantly decreases the stiffness and stability of osteosynthesis under axial loading. However, there seems to be a tendency toward higher resistance to torque. Therefore, surgeons should consider this technique if higher torsional stability is necessary, and they should decide against it, if axial stability is preferred.

Experimental magnesium phosphate cement paste increases torque of trochanteric fixation nail advanced™ blades in human femoral heads.

BACKGROUND: The use of polymethylmethacrylate cement for in-situ implant augmentation has considerable disadvantages: it is potentially cytotoxic, exothermic and non-degradable. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to develop a magnesium phosphate cement which meets the requirements for in-situ implant augmentation as an alternative. Secondly, this experimental cement was compared to commercial bone cements in a biomechanical test set-up using augmented femoral head blades. METHODS: A total of 40 human femoral heads were obtained from patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. After bone mineral density was quantified, specimens were assigned to four treatment groups. A blade of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced™ was inserted into each specimen and augmented with either Traumacem™ V+, Paste-CPC, the experimental magnesium phosphate cement or no cement. A rotational load-to-failure-test (0° to 90°) was performed. FINDINGS: A conventional two-component magnesium phosphate cement failed in-situ implant augmentation consistently due to filter pressing. Only a glycerol-based magnesium phosphate paste was suitable for the augmentation of femoral head blades. While the blades augmented with Traumacem™ V+ yielded the highest maximum torque overall (22.1 Nm), the blades augmented with Paste-CPC and the magnesium phosphate paste also showed higher maximum torque values (15.8 and 12.8 Nm) than the control group (10.8 Nm). INTERPRETATION: This study shows for the first time the development of a degradable magnesium phosphate cement paste which fulfills the requirements for in-situ implant augmentation. Simultaneously, a 48% increase in stability is demonstrated for a scenario where implant anchorage is difficult in osteoporotic bone.

"Mother and baby plate": a strategy to improve stability in proximal fractures of the ulna.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal ulna fractures with a large zone of comminution, such as in the context of Monteggia injuries, require mechanically strong osteosyntheses as they occur in regions with high physiological joint load. Consequently, implant failure and pseudarthrosis are critical and devastating complications, especially with the background of mainly young patients being affected. An effective solution could be provided by adding a small second plate 90° angulated to the standard dorsal plate in the area of non-union. Thus, this study investigates whether, from a biomechanical point of view, the use of such a mini or baby plate is worthwhile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comminuted fractures distal to the coronoid process, equivalent to Jupiter type IIb fractures, are generated on artificial Sawbones® of the ulna and stabilized using two different plate osteosyntheses: in the first group, a dorsal locking compression olecranon plate is used (LCP group). In the second group, a small, ulnar 5-hole olecranon plate is added as a baby plate in addition to the mother plate at the level of the fracture zone (MBP group). Dynamic biomechanical loading in degrees of flexion from 0° to 90° is carried out to determine yield load, stiffness, displacement, and changes in fracture gap width as well as bending of the dorsal plate. RESULTS: The "mother-baby-plate" osteosynthesis had a significantly higher yield load (p < 0.01) and stiffness (p = 0.01) than the LCP group. This correlates with the increased movement of the proximal fracture element during cyclic testing for the LCP group compared to the MBP group as measured by an optical metrology system. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we show evidence that the addition of a small plate to the standard plate is highly effective in increasing the biomechanical stability in severe fractures equivalent to Jupiter type IIb. As it hopefully minimizes complications like pseudarthrosis and implant failure and as the additional preparatory effort leading to compromised blood supply is regarded to be negligible, this justifies and highly advises the use of a mother-baby-plate system.

Retroperitoneal arterial bleeding caused by an undisplaced conservatively treated hyperextension injury of the lumbar spine - A case report.

Background: Hyperextension fractures of the thoracolumbar spine are commonly seen in ankylotic disorders due to the rigidity of the spine. The known complications include instability, neurological deficits and posttraumatic deformity but there is no report of a hemodynamic relevant arterial bleeding in undisplaced hyperextension fractures. An arterial bleeding poses a life-threatening complication and may be difficult to recognize in an ambulatory or clinical setting. Case presentation: A 78-year-old male was brought to the emergency department after suffering a domestic fall with incapacitating lower back pain. X-rays and a CT scan revealed an undisplaced L2 hyperextension fracture which was treated conservatively. 9 days after admission, the patient complained about unprecedented abdominal pain with a CT scan disclosing a 12 × 9 × 20 cm retroperitoneal hematoma on grounds of an active arterial bleeding from a branch of the L2 lumbar artery. Subsequently, access via lumbotomy, evacuation of the hematoma and insertion of a hemostatic agent was performed. The therapy concept of the L2 fracture remained conservatively. Conclusions: A secondary, retroperitoneal arterial bleeding after a conservatively treated undisplaced hyperextension fracture of the lumbar spine is a rare and severe complication that has not been described in literature yet and may be difficult to recognize. An early CT scan is recommended in case of a sudden onset of abdominal pain in these fractures to fasten treatment and hence decrease morbidity and mortality. Thus, this case report contributes to the awareness of this complication in a spine fracture type with increasing incidence and clinical relevance.

Development and preclinical evaluation of a cable-clamp fixation device for a disrupted pubic symphysis.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic separation of the pubic symphysis can destabilize the pelvis and require surgical fixation to reduce symphyseal gapping. The traditional approach involves open reduction and the implantation of a steel symphyseal plate (SP) on the pubic bone to hold the reposition. Despite its widespread use, SP-fixation is often associated with implant failure caused by screw loosening or breakage. METHODS: To address the need for a more reliable surgical intervention, we developed and tested two titanium cable-clamp implants. The cable served as tensioning device while the clamp secured the cable to the bone. The first implant design included a steel cable anterior to the pubic symphysis to simplify its placement outside the pelvis, and the second design included a cable encircling the pubic symphysis to stabilize the anterior pelvic ring. Using highly reproducible synthetic bone models and a limited number of cadaver specimens, we performed a comprehensive biomechanical study of implant stability and evaluated surgical feasibility. RESULTS: We were able to demonstrate that the cable-clamp implants provide stability equivalent to that of a traditional SP-fixation but without the same risks of implant failure. We also provide detailed ex vivo evaluations of the safety and feasibility of a trans-obturator surgical approach required for those kind of fixation. CONCLUSION: We propose that the developed cable-clamp fixation devices may be of clinical value in treating pubic symphysis separation.

Life-threatening pelvic injuries are often associated with disruption of a joint within the hip bones, called the pubic symphysis. Disruption can lead to a gap and subsequent instability of the pelvis. The current treatment is to stabilize the joint with a steel plate and screws, however this often becomes unstable soon after the operation. In this study, we analyzed two alternatives for stabilization that use cables and clamps instead of the plate. Further, we tested a surgical approach for implantation. The cables and clamps were as stable as a steel plate so offer an alternative approach to stabilize the pubic symphysis.

Plate osteosynthesis combined with bone cement provides the highest stability for tibial head depression fractures under high loading conditions.

Older patients sustaining tibial head depression fractures often cannot follow the post-operative rehabilitation protocols with partial weight-bearing of the affected limb, leading to osteosynthesis failure, cartilage step-off and arthritis development. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the biomechanical performance of different types of osteosyntheses alone and in combination with bone cement simulating cyclically high loading conditions of tibial head depression fractures. Lateral tibial head depression fractures (AO: 41-B2.2; Schatzker type III) were created in synthetic bones and stabilized using three different osteosyntheses alone and in combination with a commonly used bone cement (chronOS™): 2 screws, 4 screws in the jail technique and a lateral angle-stable buttress plate. After fixation, the lateral tibial plateau was axially loaded in two, from each other independent testing series: In the first test protocol, 5000 cycles with 500 N and in the end load-to-failure tests were performed. In the second test protocol, the cyclic loading was increased to 1000 N. Parameters of interest were the displacement of the articular fracture fragment, the stiffness and the maximum load. The osteosyntheses revealed a higher stiffness in combination with bone cement compared to the same type of osteosynthesis alone (e.g., 500 N level: 2 screws 383 ± 43 N/mm vs. 2 screws + chronOs 520 ± 108 N/mm, increase by 36%, p < 0.01; 4 screws 368 ± 97 N/mm vs. 4 screws + chronOS 516 ± 109 N/mm, increase by 40%, p < 0.01; plate: 509 ± 73 N/mm vs. plate + chronOs 792 ± 150 N/mm, increase by 56%, p < 0.01). Bone cement reduced the displacement of the plate significantly (500 N level: plate: 8.9 ± 2.8 mm vs. plate + chronOs: 3.1 ± 1.4 mm, reduction by 65%, p < 0.01; 1000 N level: 16.9 ± 3.6 mm vs 5.6 ± 1.3 mm, reduction by 67%, p < 0.01). Thus, the highest stiffness and lowest displacement values were found when using the plate with bone cement in both loading conditions (500 N level: 2 screws + chronOs 3.7 ± 1.3 mm, 4 screws + chronOs 6.2 ± 2.4 mm; 1000 N level: 2 screws + chronOs 6.5 ± 1.2 mm, 4 screws + chronOs 5.7 ± 0.8 mm). From a biomechanical perspective, plate osteosynthesis of tibial head depression fractures should always be combined with bone cement, provides higher stability than 2-screw and 4-screw fixation and is a valid treatment option in cases where extraordinary stability is required.

Surgical Fixation of Calcaneal Beak Fractures-Biomechanical Analysis of Different Osteosynthesis Techniques.

The calcaneal beak fracture is a rare avulsion fracture of the tuber calcanei characterized by a solid bony fragment at the Achilles tendon insertion. Treatment usually requires osteosynthesis. However, lack of biomechanical understanding of the ideal fixation technique persists. A beak fracture was simulated in synthetic bones and assigned to five different groups of fixation: A) 6.5-mm partial threaded cannulated screws, B) 4.0-mm partial threaded cannulated screws, C) 5.0-mm headless cannulated compression screws, D) 2.3-mm locking plate, and E) 2.8-mm locking plate. Different traction force levels were applied through an Achilles tendon surrogate in a material-testing machine on all stabilized synthetic bones. Outcome measures were peak-to-peak displacement, total displacement, plastic deformation, stiffness, visual-fracture-line displacement, and mode of implant failure. The 2.3- and 2.8-mm plating groups showed a high drop-out rate at 100 N tension force and failed under higher tension levels of 200 N. The fracture fixation using 4.0-mm partial threaded screws showed a significantly higher repair strength and was able to withhold cyclic loading up to 300 N. The lowest peak-to-peak displacement and the highest load-to-failure and stiffness were provided by fracture fixation using 6.5-mm partial threaded cannulated screws or 5.0-mm headless cannulated compression screws. As anticipated, large 6.5-mm screw diameters provide the best biomechanical fixation. Surprisingly, the 5.0-mm headless cannulated compression screws yield reliable stability despite the absent screw head and washer. When such large screws cannot be applied, 4.0-mm screws also allow reasonable fixation strength. Plate fixation should be implemented with precaution and in combination with a restrictive postoperative motion protocol. Finally, clinical cases about the surgical application and recovery are included.

Augmentation of suture anchors with magnesium phosphate cement - Simple technique with striking effect.

BACKGROUND: Suture anchors have a large field of application in orthopedic trauma surgery like the refixation of patellar, quadriceps and Achilles tendon or the treatment of rotator cuff tears. The fixation of suture anchors in osteoporotic bone is difficult, a problem that becomes increasingly relevant in the elderly. METHODS: Two types of suture anchors: 1.) Titanium CorkScrew Fast Track II with a knotted eyelet and 2.) polyether ether ketone (PEEK) SwiveLock C with a knotless eyelet were chosen for evaluation in open cell bone blocks with densities of 5-20 pcf supplied by Sawbones AB. A pilot hole of 7 mm diameter and 20 mm depth was drilled in the bone blocks and filled with an experimental drillable magnesium phosphate cement (powder: 92.5 wt% Mg3(PO4)2, 7.5 wt% MgO, liquid: 25 wt% phytic acid (C6H18O24P6)). Anchors were then inserted into the cement and allowed to cure for 24 h (37 °C, 100% humidity) before pullout testing was conducted with a material testing machine. Suture anchors inserted in the blocks after predrilling and tapping served as control. RESULTS: Through augmentation with magnesium phosphate cement pullout strength and stiffness of the suture anchors could be significantly increased in all bone blocks up to 22-fold. CorkScrew anchors failed by rupture of the eyelet with higher pullout strengths, whereas no failure of SwiveLock C anchors could be observed when reinforced with additional FibreWire at the tip. CONCLUSIONS: We present a simple technique, whereby pullout strength of suture anchors can be significantly increased in bone with compromised density. The experimental resorbable and drillable magnesium phosphate cement proved to be effective in resisting tensile load, dispersing in the adjacent bone, and thus increasing the bone-anchor contact surface. Therefore, the experimental magnesium phosphate cement is a promising candidate for clinical application in the numerous scenarios mentioned.

Experimental Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Cement Is a Promising Alternative to Conventional Bone Cements.

Clinically used mineral bone cements lack high strength values, absorbability and drillability. Therefore, magnesium phosphate cements have recently received increasing attention as they unify a high mechanical performance with presumed degradation in vivo. To obtain a drillable cement formulation, farringtonite (Mg3(PO4)2) and magnesium oxide (MgO) were modified with the setting retardant phytic acid (C6H18O24P6). In a pre-testing series, 13 different compositions of magnesium phosphate cements were analyzed concentrating on the clinical demands for application. Of these 13 composites, two cement formulations with different phytic acid content (22.5 wt% and 25 wt%) were identified to meet clinical demands. Both formulations were evaluated in terms of setting time, injectability, compressive strength, screw pullout tests and biomechanical tests in a clinically relevant fracture model. The cements were used as bone filler of a metaphyseal bone defect alone, and in combination with screws drilled through the cement. Both formulations achieved a setting time of 5 min 30 s and an injectability of 100%. Compressive strength was shown to be ~12-13 MPa and the overall displacement of the reduced fracture was <2 mm with and without screws. Maximum load until reduced fracture failure was ~2600 N for the cements only and ~3800 N for the combination with screws. Two new compositions of magnesium phosphate cements revealed high strength in clinically relevant biomechanical test set-ups and add clinically desired characteristics to its strength such as injectability and drillability.

Do not exchange the spacer during staged TKA exchange!

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the reinfection rate and risk factors for septic failure after two-stage exchange for chronic periprosthetic joint infections of primary total knee arthroplasties. Reinfections should be classified as new infection or as infection recurrence after two-stage exchange. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 60 knees with chronic periprosthetic joint infections. Follow-up information was extracted from the departments electronic database. RESULTS: The reinfection rate after a mean follow-up of 35.6 months (1-135) was 20.0%. The only significant risk factor for reinfection was spacer exchange during two-stage exchange (OR = 10.42; p = 0.001). Of the 12 cases with reinfection 6 cases were classified as new infection and 2 as infection recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patient specific factors for reinfection remain furtive. If a spacer exchange is preformed, the risk of reinfection increases. Culture results indicate that the benefit of spacer exchanges during two-stage exchange is highly questionable, particularly because reinfection is an issue of new infection rather than of infection recurrence.

Cement-augmented screw fixation for calcaneal fracture treatment: a biomechanical study comparing two injectable bone substitutes.

BACKGROUND: The role of cement-augmented screw fixation for calcaneal fracture treatment remains unclear. Therefore, this study was performed to biomechanically analyze screw osteosynthesis by reinforcement with either a calcium phosphate (CP)-based or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based injectable bone cement. METHODS: A calcaneal fracture (Sanders type IIA) including a central cancellous bone defect was generated in 27 synthetic bones, and the specimens were assigned to 3 groups. The first group was fixed with four screws (3.5 mm and 6.5 mm), the second group with screws and CP-based cement (Graftys® QuickSet; Graftys, Aix-en-Provence, France), and the third group with screws and PMMA-based cement (Traumacem™ V+; DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA). Biomechanical testing was conducted to analyze peak-to-peak displacement, total displacement, and stiffness in following a standardized protocol. RESULTS: The peak-to-peak displacement under a 200-N load was not significantly different among the groups; however, peak-to-peak displacement under a 600- and 1000-N load as well as total displacement exhibited better stability in PMMA-augmented screw osteosynthesis compared to screw fixation without augmentation. The stiffness of the construct was increased by both CP- and PMMA-based cements. CONCLUSION: Addition of an injectable bone cement to screw osteosynthesis is able to increase fixation strength in a biomechanical calcaneal fracture model with synthetic bones. In such cases, PMMA-based cements are more effective than CP-based cements because of their inherently higher compressive strength. However, whether this high strength is required in the clinical setting for early weight-bearing remains controversial, and the non-degradable properties of PMMA might cause difficulties during subsequent interventions in younger patients.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Promising Different Bone Substitutes in a Clinically Relevant Test Set-Up.

(1) Background: Bone substitutes are essential in orthopaedic surgery to fill up large bone defects. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare diverse bone fillers biomechanically to each other in a clinical-relevant test set-up and to detect differences in stability and handling for clinical use. (2) Methods: This study combined compressive strength tests and screw pullout-tests with dynamic tests of bone substitutes in a clinical-relevant biomechanical fracture model. Beyond well-established bone fillers (ChronOSTM Inject and Graftys® Quickset), two newly designed bone substitutes, a magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) and a drillable hydrogel reinforced calcium phosphate cement (CPC), were investigated. (3) Results: The drillable CPC revealed a comparable displacement of the fracture and maximum load to its commercial counterpart (Graftys® Quickset) in the clinically relevant biomechanical model, even though compressive strength and screw pullout force were higher using Graftys®. (4) Conclusions: The in-house-prepared cement allowed unproblematic drilling after replenishment without a negative influence on the stability. A new, promising bone substitute is the MPC, which showed the best overall results of all four cement types in the pure material tests (highest compressive strength and screw pullout force) as well as in the clinically relevant fracture model (lowest displacement and highest maximum load). The low viscosity enabled a very effective interdigitation to the spongiosa and a complete filling up of the defect, resulting in this demonstrated high stability. In conclusion, the two in-house-developed bone fillers revealed overall good results and are budding new developments for clinical use.