Effects of dobutamine versus insulin on cardiac performance, myocardial oxygen demand, and total body metabolism after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to study whether the hemodynamic benefit of a catabolic catecholamine (dobutamine) induces a certain oxygen cost for the myocardial energy demand and whether this effect would be less pronounced if an anabolic intervention, such as the administration of insulin, was used. DESIGN: A prospective and randomized study. SETTING: A university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Investigation of two comparable groups of cardiac patients. INTERVENTIONS: The interventions were postoperative infusions of dobutamine, 7 micrograms/kg/min, and of insulin, 1.5 U/kg/h, respectively, over a period of 30 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The effects of the interventions were measured using parameters relating to cardiac work and myocardial oxygen demand. Moreover, parameters relating to total body metabolism were also recorded. In the dobutamine group, cardiac index (CI) and left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) increased significantly (p < 0.05) during therapy by 30% and 40%, respectively. Cardiac effort index (CEI) and tension time index (TTI) also increased (p < 0.05) during therapy by 41% and 30%, respectively. However, in the insulin group, CI and LVSWI also increased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05) during therapy, although to a lesser extent (16% and 14%), but CEI and TTI did not change at all during therapy. Total body CO2 production (VCO2) and O2 consumption (VO2) in the dobutamine group increased (p < 0.05) during therapy by 9% and 11%, respectively, whereas in the insulin group only CO2 production increased (p < 0.05) by 13%. O2 consumption remained unchanged in this group. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that dobutamine as well as insulin administration increase cardiac performance. However, in contrast to dobutamine, insulin does not appear to increase myocardial oxygen demand. Therefore, the anabolic insulin administration may represent a more economic pattern of energy-consuming hemodynamic intervention than does the catabolic catecholamine administration.

[The use of a rapid infusion system in orthopedics]. / Der Einsatz eines Schnellinfusionssystems in der Orthopädie.

Major orthopedic surgery such as partial resection of the pelvis and subsequent implantation of a prosthesis is highly connected with massive bleeding. Therefore we tested the hypothesis that the use of a rapid infusion device, which was originally designed for liver transplantations, can prevent hypovolemic shock. We studied 20 patients: in one group (n = 10) the iv volume was given in a conventional way (37 degrees C) by use of pressure infusion bags. Patients of the second group (n = 10) received the iv volume via the Rapid Infusion system (Haemonetics Corp., Braintree, MA). We can conclude that with this new device for rapid volume replacement it is possible to keep the patient's vital functions stable even during times of excessive bleeding and to prevent from metabolic consequences following hypovolemic shock.

Improved cardiac performance and reduced pulmonary vascular constriction by epinephrine administration via a left atrial catheter in cardiac surgical patients.

Diminished left ventricular contractility and increased right ventricular afterload are issues in cardiac surgery. The usual administration of catecholamines (epinephrine) via the central venous (CV) catheter increases cardiac output, but also may increase pulmonary vascular constriction. Epinephrine was, therefore, administered via the left atrial (LA) catheter or the CV catheter in 8 cardiac surgery patients, each serving as his or her own control. The LA administration of epinephrine has an advantage with its immediate effect on the coronary circulation, while avoiding associated pulmonary vasoconstriction by passing through the systemic capillary bed before reaching the lung. It was found in this study that administration of epinephrine via an LA catheter increased the average cardiac output by 1.05 L/min, which was significantly (P < 0.05) greater than with administration via the CV catheter. With LA administration of epinephrine, systemic arterial pressure (systolic arterial pressure and diastolic arterial pressure) (SAP, DAP) were also elevated to a greater extent than by CV administration. On the other hand, pulmonary arterial pressures (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure and diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure) (SPAP, DPAP) were less elevated than by administration via the CV catheter. This produced increased coronary perfusion and a smaller increase in pulmonary vascular tone by LA administration in contrast to CV administration of epinephrine. It is concluded that epinephrine administration via an LA catheter improved myocardial performance and pulmonary perfusion due to direct entry of the agent into the coronary circulation and partial metabolism while passing through the systemic capillary bed before reaching the lung.