Usefulness of Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement for the Identification of Extended-criteria Donors and Risk-assessment in Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) are noninvasive surrogates for hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, respectively, and could help identify extended criteria donors in liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to determine the accuracy of CAP/LSM in deceased donors along with post-LT changes. METHODS: Accuracy of preprocurement CAP/LSM to grade/stage steatosis/fibrosis was determined using liver biopsy as reference. Transplant outcomes, including primary nonfunction (PNF) and early allograft dysfunction, were recorded. Recipients underwent CAP/LSM as outpatients. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve and regression models were constructed to analyze data. RESULTS: We prospectively evaluated 160 allografts (138 transplanted). Same-probe paired baseline/post-LT CAP was 231 dB/m (181-277)/225 (187-261) (P = 0.61), and LSM 7.6 kPa (6.3-10.8)/5.9 (4.6-8.7) (P = 0.002), respectively. CAP reading was affected by BMI and LSM by ALT, race and bilirubin. Although CAP did not correlate with steatosis from frozen sections (ρ = 0.08, P = 0.47), it correlated with steatosis from permanent sections (ρ = 0.32, P < 0.001) and with oil red O histomorphometry (ρ = 0.35, P = 0.001). CAP identified moderate-to-severe steatosis with an areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve curve of 0.79 (0.66-0.91), for a negative predictive value of 100% at a cutoff value of 230 dB/m. LSM correlated with fibrosis staging (ρ = 0.22, P = 0.007) and it identified discarded allografts with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. Patients with no to minimal fibrosis had an LSM of 7.6 (6-10.1) kPa. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are proof-of-concept of the utility of CAP/LSM during organ procurement. Establishing the precise role of these noninvasive tools in the organ allocation process mandates confirmatory studies.

Impact of Advanced Renal Dysfunction on Posttransplant Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Survival after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States is excellent. However, the significance of pretransplant kidney disease on outcomes in this population is poorly understood. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2806 LDLT recipients nationally between January 2010 and June 2020. Recipients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL/min/1.73 m2 (eGFR-low) or requiring dialysis were compared. Multivariable survival analyses evaluated (1) eGFR-low as a predictor of post-LDLT survival and (2) the survival of LDLT versus deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) alone with eGFR-low. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2020, 140 (5.0%) patients had eGFR-low and 18 (0.6%) required dialysis pre-LDLT. The number of LDLTs requiring dialysis between 2017 and 2020 outnumbered the prior 7 y. Overall LDLT experience was greater at centers performing LDLT in recipients with renal dysfunction (P < 0.001). LDLT recipients with eGFR-low had longstanding renal dysfunction: mean eGFR 3-6 mo before LDLT 42.7 (±15.1) mL/min/1.73 m2. Nearly half (5/12) of eGFR-low recipients with active kidney transplant (KT) listing at LDLT experienced renal recovery. Five patients underwent early KT after LDLT via the new "safety net" policy. Unadjusted survival after LDLT was worse with eGFR-low (hazard ratio 2.12 versus eGFR ≥40 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-3.05; P < 0.001), but no longer so when accounting for mean eGFR 3-6 mo pre-LDLT (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.95; P = 0.3). The adjusted survival of patients with eGFR-low receiving LDLT versus deceased donor liver transplant alone was not different (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, outcomes after LDLT with advanced renal dysfunction are acceptable. These findings are relevant given the recent "safety net" KT policy.

Liver and Kidney Recipient Selection of Hepatitis C Virus Viremic Donors: Meeting Consensus Report From the 2019 Controversies in Transplantation.

The development of multiple highly effective and safe direct-acting antivirals to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) has resulted in greater ease and confidence in managing HCV infection in transplant recipients that in turn has impacted the solid organ transplant community as well. In the United States, the opioid epidemic has increased the number of overdose deaths with a concomitant increase in younger HCV viremic donors after brain death being identified. At the same time, a decrease in HCV viremic transplant candidates has led to a growing interest in exploring the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney donor allografts in HCV-negative recipients. To date, experience with the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts in HCV-negative recipients is limited to a few small prospective research trials, case series, and case reports. There are also limited data on recipient and donor selection for HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts. In response to this rapidly changing landscape in the United States, experts in the field of viral hepatitis and liver and kidney transplantation convened a meeting to review current data on liver and kidney recipient selection and developed consensus opinions related specifically to recipient and donor selection of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts.

Interleukin-28B and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in posttransplant hepatitis C: a case-control study and literature review.

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC)-related cirrhosis is the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). However, the recurrence of a hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after transplantation is universal and is associated with worse outcomes. Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is a particularly severe manifestation of a recurrent HCV infection and frequently results in graft failure and death. The identification of risk factors for FCH is important but has been limited by the low frequency of FCH. The interleukin-28B (IL-28B) genotype is important in an HCV infection: it is related to the clinical severity of an acute infection and may play a role in the development of FCH as well. Two hundred seventy-two consecutive LT cases for CHC were studied at a single institution. Consensus criteria were used to define an FCH cohort. The remainder of the study population served as a control group. The IL-28B genotype (at the rs12979860 locus) from both the donor and the recipient was determined, and other clinically relevant data were tabulated. A nonparametric statistical analysis was performed. Twelve cases of FCH were identified, and they were compared to a control group of 260 LT cases without FCH. A detailed analysis of clinical characteristics, including treatment responses and outcomes, was tabulated. FCH was associated with the earlier recurrence of HCV infections, higher HCV viral loads, and lower levels of immunosuppressive medications. There was a nonsignificant increase in recipient IL-28B non-CC genotypes in cases developing FCH. In conclusion, a high HCV viral load and earlier recurrence were identified as risk factors for FCH. It is still unclear what role immunosuppression plays in the pathogenesis of FCH and whether IL-28B polymorphisms constitute a risk factor. Collaborative studies with larger numbers of study subjects are needed in order to define these issues.