RESUMO
Because of preservation of proximal femoral bone stock and minimized soft tissue trauma, short-stem implants are becoming increasingly important in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The postulated advantage regarding the functional outcome has not been verified. We hypothesized an increased abductor muscle strength by the use of a short-stem design. Seventy consecutive patients of a randomized clinical trial were included. Of these, 67 patients met the inclusion criteria after 12 months. Thirty-five patients received a standard straight stem and 32 patients a short-stem femoral component. All surgeries were performed by a modified direct lateral approach. Isometric muscle strength of the hip abductors was evaluated preoperatively 3 and 12 months after surgery. Harris hip score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were evaluated. After three months, there were no differences between the two groups; the abductor force was comparable to the preoperative initial values. After 12 months, a significant increase in muscle strength for the short stem patient group compared to preoperative baseline values was measured (straight-stem THA, 0.09 Nm/kg ± 0.4, p = 0.32; short-stem THA, 0.2 Nm/kg ± 0.3, p = 0.004). Comparison of the 12-month postoperative total HHS and WOMAC revealed no significant differences between both groups. A significant increase in hip abductor muscle strength 12 months after short-stem THA compared to conventional-stem THA was observed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Short stem prostheses have been developed to preserve proximal femoral bone stock. This prospective, randomized study compared periprosthetic bone remodelling following short and straight stem implantation 1 year after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were randomized to either a Fitmore short or a cementless straight stem (both Zimmer, Winterthur, Switzerland). Periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry performed the day before surgery and at 7 days, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Furthermore, the HHS and the WOMAC were obtained. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients completed 1-year follow-up. Periprosthetic BMD changes at 1 year were most pronounced in the proximal medial region of interest (ROI) 7 with -17.2% after short stem and -16.7% after straight implantation (p = 0.67). However, there was significantly less BMD reduction in ROI 6 following short (-4.7%) versus straight stem (-10.8%) implantation (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the HHS and the WOMAC either before or after surgery. CONCLUSION: One year after surgery, both stems showed an implant-specific periprosthetic bone remodelling. Nevertheless, proximal load transfer was more pronounced after short stem implantation than with a straight stem.