[Impact Analysis of a new, Cross-sector Service Provision of Gastroenterologic Endoscopic Services in Accordance with 115f SGB V (Hybrid-DRG): Allocation Matrix and Cost Analysis]. / Auswirkungsanalyse einer neuen, sektorenübergreifenden Erbringung bisher stationärer endoskopischer gastroenterologischer Leistungen entsprechend §115f SGB V (Hybrid-DRG): Zuordnungsmatrix und Kostenanalyse.

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of §115f SGB V, the prerequisites for "sector-equal remuneration" ('Hybrid DRG') have been created. In an impact analysis, we assigned inpatient gastroenterological endoscopic (GAEN) cases in a matrix of future hybrid DRG versus outpatient surgery (AOP) or inpatient treatment. METHODS: In selected DRGs (G47B, G67A, G67B, G67C, G71Z, H41D, H41E) an allocation matrix of GAEN cases was created on medical grounds. For this purpose, service groups from the DGVS service catalog ('Leistungskatalog') were assigned to the groups: 'Hybrid-DRG', 'AOP' and 'Inpatient' by a group of experts based on the DGVS position paper. Cost data from the DGVS-DRG project for the 2022 data year from 36 InEK calculation hospitals with a total of 232,476 GAEN cases were evaluated. RESULTS: 26 service groups from the DGVS service catalog were assigned to a "Hybrid-DRG", 24 to the "inpatient" group, and 12 to the "AOP" group. 7 performance groups were splitted "depending on the OPS code" and classified at this level. Cases with additional fees were excluded from a hybrid DRG because these cannot be agreed there.The cost analysis shows that services that are already in the AOP have a similar cost level to services that have been classified as 'Hybrid-DRG'. With the cost calculation, a cost level could be presented for the hybrid DRGs formed. CONCLUSION: Based on clearly defined structural, procedural and personnel requirements, services from suitable DRGs can be transferred to a hybrid DRG. Assigning services without the involvement of clinical experts seems extremely difficult. Case assignment based on arbitrary contextual factors increases complexity without demonstrably increasing the quality of the assignment and needs to be further developed. A cost analysis can be derived from the known inpatient costs and must serve as the basis for the 2025 Hybrid DRG catalog.

[A critical DRG-evaluation of cases with inflammatory bowel disease]. / Ein kritischer DRG-Blick auf Fälle mit chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen.

INTRODUCTION: Whether inpatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are reimbursed in a cost-covering manner in German hospitals has not yet been investigated. In this context, the present study analyses the reimbursement situation (cost-revenue comparison) of IBD in German hospitals with regard to the complexity of the disease and the type of care. METHODS: For this retrospective study, anonymized case data, including cost data from the InEK calculation (§ 21-4 KHEntgG) of the DRG project of the German Society for Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) from 2019, were available. 3385 cases with IBD the as main diagnosis from 49 hospitals were analyzed. To investigate the impact of disease complexity on reimbursement, different variables were analyzed, including gastroenterological complications, infections, the reason for admission, and additional charges. To investigate possible center effects, hospitals were grouped by type of care, mostly defined by the number of beds. RESULTS: The present study shows that all types of care can be classified as not cost-covering on average. The under-recovery is, on average, 10% (296 € absolute under-recovery) and varies between the types of care. Cases with higher complexity show a higher cost under-recovery than cases with lower complexity. At the DRG level, the analyzed costs of the three most common IBD DRGs for inlier patients are higher than the InEK costs; however, the difference is not significant. Nonetheless, cases with the admission reason transfer of specific DRGs bear significantly higher costs. DISCUSSION: Our results show that CED is not reimbursed in a cost-covering manner. This is due to inadequate reimbursement for gastroenterological complications, infections, specific procedures, and emergency and transfer cases. Transfer cases bear significantly higher costs.

[Costs of potentially outpatient endoscopic procedures in cases with a 1-day hospital stay versus a longer stay]. / Kosten potenziell ambulant erbringbarer endoskopischer Leistungen in Fällen mit 1-Tages-Verweildauer gegenüber einer längeren Verweildauer.

INTRODUCTION: The transfer of patient care and medical interventions that was previously provided on an inpatient basis to outpatient settings is a stated goal of health politics. It is unclear to what extent costs of an endoscopic procedure and the disease severity depend on the duration of inpatient treatment. We therefore examined whether endoscopic services for cases with a one-day length of stay (VWD) are comparably expensive to cases with a longer VWD. METHODS: Outpatient services were selected from the DGVS service catalog. Day cases with exactly one such gastroenterological endoscopic (GAEN) service were compared with cases with VWD>1 day regarding their patient clinical complexity levels (PCCL) and mean costs. Data from the DGVS-DRG project with §21-KHEntgG cost data from a total of 57 hospitals from 2018 and 2019 served as the basis. Endoscopic costs were taken from cost center group 8 of the InEK cost matrix and plausibility checked. RESULTS: A total of 122,514 cases with exactly one GAEN service were identified. Statistically equal costs were shown in 30 of 47 service groups. In 10 groups, the cost difference was not relevant (<10%). Cost differences >10% existed only for EGD with variceal therapy, insertion of a self-expanding prosthesis, dilatation/bougienage/exchange with PTC/PTCD in place, non-extensive ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and colonoscopy with submucosal or full thickness resection, or foreign object removal. PCCL differed in all but one group. CONCLUSION: Gastroenterology endoscopy services provided as part of inpatient care but potentially performable on an outpatient basis are predominantly equally expensive for day cases as for patients with a length of stay greater than one day. The disease severity is lower. Calculated §21-KHEntgG cost data thus form a reliable basis for the calculation of appropriate reimbursement for hospital services to be provided as outpatient services under the AOP in the future.

Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infections in inpatient care in Germany: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis from 79 hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) present a substantial burden to patients and healthcare systems. This study aimed to elucidate the prevalence of SSIs in German hospitals and to quantify their clinical and economic burden based on German hospital reimbursement data (G-DRG). METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used a 2010-2016 G-DRG dataset to determine the prevalence of SSIs in hospital, using ICD-10-GM codes, after surgical procedures. The captured economic and clinical outcomes were used to quantify and compare resource use, reimbursement and clinical parameters for patients who had or did not have an SSI. FINDINGS: Of the 4,830,083 patients from 79 hospitals, 221,113 were eligible. The overall SSI prevalence for the study period was 4.9%. After propensity-score matching, procedure type, immunosuppression and BMI ≥30 were found to significantly affect the risk of SSI (p<0.001). Mortality and length of stay (LOS) were significantly higher in patients who had an SSI (mortality: 9.3% compared with 4.5% [p<0.001]; LOS (median [interquartile range, IQR]): 28 [27] days compared with 12 [8] days [p<0.001]). Case costs were significantly higher for the SSI group (median [IQR]) €19,008 [25,162] compared with € 9,040 [7,376] [p<0.001]). A median underfunding of SSI was identified at €1,534 per patient. INTERPRETATION: The dataset offers robust information about the "real-world" clinical and economic burden of SSI in hospitals in Germany. The significantly increased mortality of patients with SSI, and their underfunding, calls for a maximization of efforts to prevent SSI through the use of evidence-based SSI-reduction care bundles.

Clinical and economical improvements after introducing rapid identification of bacteria and early antibiotic susceptibility testing in sepsis and bloodstream infections. Results of the PHENOMENON study.

Background: Sepsis and bloodstream infections pose severe challenges in intensive care. Early reliable diagnosis is the key to successful therapy. The objective of the study presented here was to investigate the clinical and economical effects of the new PhenoTM BC test, which allows bacteria identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in approximately 7 hours after a blood culture becomes positive (BC+). Methods: Historically controlled interventional study. Population: patients with BC+ and ICU admission. Inadequate initial antimicrobial therapy (IAT) is need of therapy change based on result. Prospectively the new test was used in addition. Primary endpoint: time-to-result in hours. Contribution margin (CM) i.e. revenue - costs was computed. All patients formed the intention-to-treat population (ITT). Patients with complete cost data formed the modified ITT group (mITT). CM results were calculated for mITT and PP. Further analyses: length-of-stay (LOS) and mortality. Results: 223 historical and 200 prospective patients were included. Time to result (ITT) was shortened by 51.1 hours (83 vs. 31.9; p<0.001). Overall savings (mITT) were 257,100 € (-301,264 € vs. -44,164 €). 143 of 181 (79%) patients had a test performed, 126 of 143 (88%) having a clinically useable result. 40 (32%) had IAT vs. 65 (29%) in the historic cohort. Median time to AST in PP was shortened by 61.7 hours (89.5 vs. 27.8; p<0.001). LOS was shortened 7 days (28 vs. 19; p=0.226) and mortality was 8% (40.5% vs. 32.5%; p=0.440) lower. Median CM +3,074.80 € per case (-2,350.50 € vs. +724.70 €; p=0.040). Conclusion: The new PhenoTM ID+AST test leads to faster and clinically meaningful results and saves money by shortening LOS on the ICU.

Potential savings through single-dose intravenous Dalbavancin in long-term MRSA infection treatment - a health economic analysis using German DRG data.

Complicated infections such as osteomyelitis, skin and soft tissue infections or endocarditis often require antibiotic therapies that can last up to several weeks. The prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) leads to a dramatic increase in costs. Single-dose intravenous Dalbavancin is a novel antimicrobial agent for the treatment of acute bacterial skin, skin structure and soft tissue infections (ABSSSI) that allows an earlier discharge of patients, resulting in potential savings. Joint, bone and prostheses infections (JBPI) are also related with long LOS. The aim of this study is to determine the economic effects of single-dose intravenous Dalbavancin in suitable patients with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Germany. For this purpose, an analysis with real-world patient treatment data was performed, which was subsequently validated in a large German hospital. In total, ABSSSI patients with MRSA infections could stay 6.45 days shorter and 2,865 € could be saved while JBPI patients could be discharged eventually 10.6 days earlier and 3,909 € could be saved. Single-dose intravenous Dalbavancin is thus an option for patients with ABSSSI and JBPI who are eligible for discharge.

[Cost assessment for endoscopic procedures in the German diagnosis-related-group (DRG) system - 5 year cost data analysis of the German Society of Gastroenterology project]. / Kosten endoskopischer Leistungen der Gastroenterologie im deutschen DRG-System ­ 5-Jahres-Kostendatenanalyse des DGVS-Projekts.

Background In the German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) endoscopic procedures are listed in cost center 8. For reimbursement between hospital departments and external providers outdated or incomplete catalogues (e. g. DKG-NT, GOÄ) have remained in use. We have assessed the cost for endoscopic procedures in the G-DRG-system. Methods To assess the cost of endoscopic procedures 74 hospitals, annual providers of cost-data to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) made their data (2011 - 2015; §â€Š21 KHEntgG) available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS) in anonymized form (4873 809 case-data-sets). Using cases with exactly one endoscopic procedure (n = 274 186) average costs over 5 years were calculated for 46 endoscopic procedure-tiers. Results Robust mean endoscopy costs ranged from 230.56 € for gastroscopy (144 666 cases), 276.23 € (n = 32 294) for a simple colonoscopy, to 844.07 € (n = 10 150) for ERCP with papillotomy and plastic stent insertion and 1602.37 € (n = 967) for ERCP with a self-expanding metal stent. Higher costs, specifically for complex procedures, were identified for University Hospitals. Discussion For the first time this catalogue for endoscopic procedure-tiers, based on §â€Š21 KHEntgG data-sets from 74 InEK-calculating hospitals, permits a realistic assessment of endoscopy costs in German hospitals. The higher costs in university hospitals are likely due to referral bias for complex cases and emergency interventions. For 46 endoscopic procedure-tiers an objective cost-allocation within the G-DRG system is now possible. By international comparison the costs of endoscopic procedures in Germany are low, due to either greater efficiency, lower personnel allocation or incomplete documentation of the real expenses.