The LDL-C/ApoB ratio predicts major cardiovascular events in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The low density lipoprotein cholesterol to Apolipoprotein B (LDL-C/ApoB) ratio is a validated proxy for low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size that can be easily calculated from a standard lipid/apolipoprotein profile. Whether it is predictive of cardiovascular events in patients with established atherosclerosis is not known and is addressed in the present investigation. METHODS: We determined the LDL-C/ApoB ratio in a cohort of 1687 subjects with established atherosclerosis. Prospectively, major cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke were recorded over a period of 9.9 ± 4.6 years. The study covers >16,000 patient-years. RESULTS: At baseline, the LDL-C/ApoB ratio was 1.36 ± 0.28 in our cohort. During follow up, a total of 558 first MACE were recorded. The LDL-C/ApoB ratio predicted MACE in univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis (HR 0.90 [0.82-0.98]; p = 0.014); this finding was confirmed after adjustment for age, gender, intensity of statin treatment, hypertension, history of smoking, type 2 diabetes, body mass index and ApoB (HR 0.87 [0.78-0.97]; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The LDL-C/ApoB ratio is independently predictive of MACE in subjects with established atherosclerosis.

Usefulness of Handgrip Strength to Predict Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Handgrip strength (HGS) is a validated and simple technique to estimate skeletal muscular strength. Whether HGS is a predictor of overall mortality in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) is not known, this question is therefore addressed in the present study. We prospectively investigated a cohort of 691 patients with angiographically proven CAD. HGS was measured at baseline, and all-cause death as well as cardiovascular events was recorded over a period of up to 12 years. During a follow-up time of 9.2 ± 3.1 years, 31.3% (n = 216) of the study participants died. Further, 27.8% (n = 192) suffered major cardiovascular events and 56.6% (n = 391) any cardiovascular event. Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed a reduced mortality risk with higher HGS univariately (hazard ratio [HR] for each 5 kg increase in HGS 0.87 [95% confidence interval 0.82 to 0.92]; p <0.001), after adjustment for age and gender (HR 0.86 [0.79 to 0.94]; p = 0.001), and after further adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (HR 0.86 [0.79 to 0.94]; p = 0.001). Similarly, high HGS was protective of major cardiovascular events as well as of total cardiovascular events (HRs in the fully adjusted model 0.86 [0.78 to 0.94]; p = 0.002 and 0.89 [0.83 to 0.96]; p = 0.002, respectively). From these data, we conclude that HGS is an independent predictor of overall survival and of cardiovascular events in patients with CAD.

Data on the impact of peripheral artery disease and of type 2 diabetes mellitus on the risk of cardiovascular events.

Here, we provide additional data addressing the individual and combined associations of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and of peripheral artery disease (PAD) with future cardiovascular events in a prospective cohort study including 338 PAD patients and 711 patients who did not have PAD. Subgroup analyses regarding patient age as well as additional Cox regression models taking into account medications are presented. This data article is related to a research article titled "Single and combined effects of peripheral artery disease and of type 2 diabetes mellitus on the risk of cardiovascular events: a prospective cohort study" (Saely et al., 2018).

Single and combined effects of peripheral artery disease and of type 2 diabetes mellitus on the risk of cardiovascular events: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The individual and combined effects of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) on future cardiovascular events are unknown and are addressed in the present investigation. METHODS: Cardiovascular events were prospectively recorded in 1049 subjects, encompassing 4 groups: 558 with neither PAD nor diabetes, 153 with T2DM but without PAD, 192 with PAD but without T2DM and 146 with the combination of PAD and T2DM. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up period of 7.2 ±â€¯2.6 years, the cardiovascular event rate was lowest in patients with neither PAD nor T2DM (16.7%). Compared to this group the event rate was not significantly increased in T2DM patients without PAD (22.2%, p = 0.077) but higher in non-diabetic patients with PAD (52.6%; p < 0.001) and further increased in patients with both PAD and T2DM (71.2%; p < 0.001). Nondiabetic PAD patients were at a higher cardiovascular risk than T2DM patients without PAD (p < 0.001). Compared to those with neither PAD nor T2DM, hazard ratios after multivariate adjustment were 1.26 [0.84-1.91]; p = 0.267, 4.17 [2.97-5.85]; p < 0.001, and 7.82 [5.49-11.12]; p < 0.001 for those with T2DM only, for those with PAD only and for those with the combination of PAD plus diabetes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PAD is a stronger risk factor for future cardiovascular events than T2DM, but T2DM in PAD patients accelerates atherothrombotic disease and strongly increases the incidence of cardiovascular events.