Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0214052, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30897186

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures remain the gold standard for detecting bacteremia despite their limitations. The current practice of blood culture collection is still inefficient with low yields. Limited focus has been given to the association between timing of specimen collection at different time points during admission and their yield. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective observational study by analyzing all 3,890 sets of cultures collected from the 1,962 admitted patients over the seven-month period of this study. We compared the blood culture yield between the early group (≤24 hours after admission) and the late group (> 24 hours of admission). We also investigated the effect of prehospital oral antibiotics and pre-analytical time on the first cultures in the emergency department. Epidemiology and efficiency of blood cultures were studied for each medical specialty. RESULTS: In total, 3,349(86.1%) blood cultures were negative and 541(13.9%) were positive for one or more microorganisms. After correcting for contamination, the overall yield was 290 (7.5%). The early group (n = 1,490) yielded significantly more true-positive cultures (10.1% versus 5.8%, P<0.001) than the late group (n = 2,400). The emergency department had a significantly higher yield than general wards, 11.2% versus 5.7% (p<0.001). Prehospital oral antibiotic use and pre-analytical time did not affect the yield of first cultures at the emergency department (p = 0.735 and 0.816 respectively). The number of tests needed to obtain one true-positive culture varied between departments, ranging from 7 to 45. CONCLUSION: This study showed that blood cultures are inefficient in detecting bacteremia. Cultures collected during 24 hours after admission yielded more positive results than those collected later. Significant variations in blood culture epidemiology and efficiency per specialty suggest that guidelines should be reevaluated. Future studies should aim at improving blood culture yield, implementing educational programs to reduce contamination and cost-effective application of modern molecular diagnostic technologies.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Hemocultura/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Hemocultura/normas , Hemocultura/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Quartos de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Manejo de Espécimes , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Trop Doct ; 41(1): 33-5, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21088023

RESUMO

The Giemsa stain is used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of malaria on blood smears. The classical staining procedure requires between 30 and 45 min. We modified the Giemsa stain and reduced the staining time to 5 min without any loss of quality.


Assuntos
Corantes Azur , Corantes , Malária/diagnóstico , Plasmodium falciparum/isolamento & purificação , Plasmodium ovale/isolamento & purificação , Plasmodium vivax/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/métodos , Humanos , Malária/sangue , Malária/parasitologia , Parasitemia/sangue , Parasitemia/diagnóstico , Parasitemia/parasitologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Coloração e Rotulagem/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...