Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 20(1): 78, 2020 04 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test for prostate cancer is considered a preference sensitive decision; meaning it does not only depend on what is best from a medical point of view, but also from a patient value standpoint. Decision aids are evidence-based tools which are shown to help people feel clearer about their values; therefore it has been advocated that decision aids should contain a specific values clarification method (VCM). VCMs may be either implicit or explicit, but the evidence concerning the best method is scarce. We aim to compare the perceived clarity of personal values in men considering PSA screening using decision aids with no VCM versus an implicit VCM versus an explicit VCM. METHODS: Male factory employees from an industrial facility in the Northern region of Portugal aged 50 to 69 years old will be randomly assigned to one of three decision aid groups used to support prostate cancer screening decisions: (i) decision aid with information only (control), (ii) decision aid with information plus an implicit VCM, (iii) decision aid with information plus an explicit VCM. Men will be allowed release time from work to attend a session at their workplace. After a brief oral presentation, those willing to participate in the study will fill the baseline questionnaire, plus a 5 point-Likert scale question about intentions to undergo screening, and will then receive the intervention materials to complete. We estimated a total sample size of 276 participants; with 92 in each group. The primary outcome will be the perceived clarity of personal values assessed by the Portuguese validated translation of the three subscales of the Decisional Conflict Scale. Secondary outcomes will be intention to be screened (before and after the intervention), the total score from the Decisional Conflict Scale and the self-report of having or not undergone screening at 6 months. DISCUSSION: This study will add to the body of evidence on the role of decision aids to support health preference-sensitive choices and provide further insight on the impact of different methods for eliciting people's values embedded within a decision aid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03988673 - clinicalTrials.gov (2019/06/17).


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Participação do Paciente , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Idoso , Tomada de Decisões , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Portugal , Neoplasias da Próstata , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Rev Med Brux ; 39(4): 383-393, 2018.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30321004

RESUMO

The concept of quaternary prevention, resulting from a reflection on the doctor-patient relationship, is presented as a renewal of the ageold ethical requirement: first, a doctor must not harm; second, the doctor must control himself/herself. The origin of the concept, its endorsement by the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA) and the European Union of General Practitioners (UEMO), its dissemination, and the debates to which it has given rise, are presented by a panel of authors from 12 countries and 3 continents. This collective text deals more specifically with the ethics of prevention, the importance of teaching Quaternary prevention and Evidence Based Medicine, the social and political implications of the concept of quaternary prevention, and its anthropological dimensions.


Le concept de prévention quaternaire, issu d'une réflexion sur la relation médecin-patient, est présenté d'une part comme un renouvellement d'une exigence éthique séculaire ; d'abord ne pas nuire et d'autre part comme un plaidoyer pour un autocontrôle du médecin. L'origine du concept, son approbation par l'Organisation Mondiale des Médecins de Famille (WONCA) et l'Union Européenne des Médecins Omnipraticiens (UEMO), sa diffusion et les débats auxquels il a donné lieu, sont présentés par un panel d'auteurs de 12 pays et trois continents. Ce texte collectif traite plus spécifiquement de l'éthique de la prévention, de l'importance de l'enseignement de la prévention quaternaire et de la médecine factuelle, des implications sociales et politiques du concept de prévention quaternaire et de ses dimensions anthropologiques.


Assuntos
Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Antropologia , Humanos , Política , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/ética , Fatores Sociológicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA