Multiple psychological factors predict pain and disability among community-dwelling knee osteoarthritis patients: a five-year prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of long-term pain and disability in knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study of five years. SETTING: Primary care providers. SUBJECTS: In all, 108 patients (mean age = 63.6 years, standard deviation (SD) = 7.2 years) with knee pain (⩾40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index pain scale) and radiographic grading (Kellgren-Lawrence: 2-4) of knee osteoarthritis who participated in a randomized controlled trial. MAIN MEASURES: Disease-specific pain and functioning were assessed using the corresponding WOMAC subscales. Generic functioning was assessed by the RAND-36 subscales for function and physical and mental component summary scores. Possible baseline predictors for these outcomes were (1) demographic and disease-related variables and (2) psychological variables of mood (anxiety, depression), pain-related cognitions (pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia), and positive resource factors (life satisfaction, sense of coherence). RESULTS: Multivariate linear mixed model analyses revealed that minimal anxiety at baseline predicted significantly better results for pain (WOMAC, P = 0.019) and function (WOMAC, P = 0.001, RAND-36 function P = 0.001). High pain self-efficacy predicted significantly better scores in RAND-36 function (P = 0.006), physical (P = 0.004) and mental (P = 0.001) component summaries. Pain catastrophizing predicted higher pain (P = 0.015), whereas fear of movement predicted poorer functioning in RAND-36 physical (P = 0.016) and mental (P = 0.009) component summaries. Those satisfied with life reported higher scores in RAND-36 function (P = 0.002) and mental component summary (P = 0.041). A low number of comorbidities predicted significantly better results in pain (WOMAC P = 0.019) and function (WOMAC P = 0.033, RAND-36 P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Anxiety, pain-related cognitions, and psychological resources predict symptoms in knee osteoarthritis in the long term.

Determinants of pain and functioning in knee osteoarthritis: a one-year prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of pain and disability in knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: A one-year prospective analysis of determinants of pain and functioning in knee osteoarthritis. STUDY SETTING: Primary care providers in a medium-sized city. PATIENTS: A total of 111 patients aged from 35 to 75 with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading (Kellgren-Lawrence 2-4) of knee osteoarthritis who participated in a randomized controlled trial. MAIN MEASURES: The outcome measures were self-reported pain and function, which were recorded at 0, 3 and 12 months. Disease-specific pain and functioning were assessed using the pain and function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index. Generic physical and mental functioning were assessed using the RAND-36 subscales for function, and physical and mental component summary scores. Possible baseline predictors for these outcomes were 1) demographic, socioeconomic and disease-related variables, and 2) psychological measures of resources, distress, fear of movement and catastrophizing. RESULTS: Multivariate linear mixed model analyses revealed that normal mood at baseline measured with the Beck Anxiety Inventory predicted significantly better results in all measures of pain (WOMAC P=0.02) and function (WOMAC P=0.002, RAND-36 P=0.002) during the one-year follow-up. Psychological resource factors (pain self-efficacy P=0.012, satisfaction with life P=0.002) predicted better function (RAND-36). Pain catastrophizing predicted higher WOMAC pain levels (P=0.013), whereas fear of movement (kinesiophobia) predicted poorer functioning (WOMAC P=0.046, RAND-36 P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple psychological factors in people with knee osteoarthritis pain are associated with the development of disability and longer term worse pain.

Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioural group intervention for knee osteoarthritis pain: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a six week cognitive-behavioural group intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis pain. DESIGN: Single-blinded randomized controlled trial. STUDY SETTING: Primary care providers in a medium-sized city in Finland. PATIENTS: A total of 111 participants aged from 35 to 75 with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading (Kellgren-Lawrence 2-4) of knee osteoarthritis were included. INTERVENTIONS: In the intervention group, 55 participants attended a cognitive-behavioural training programme for pain management with six weekly group sessions supervised by a psychologist and a physiotherapist. Concurrently, they and the 56 participants of the control group continued in ordinary GP care that was not altered by the study. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome on three-month and 12-month follow-up was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis index pain subscale. Secondary outcome measures included self-reports of pain and physical function, health-related quality of life, and a comprehensive set of psychological questionnaires. RESULTS: Mixed model results showed no significant differences between the intervention and control group for any measures of pain or function. A significant difference between the groups was found in the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (Pr = 0.022) in favour of the control group, and in the RAND-36 emotional well-being subscale in favour of the intervention group (Pr = 0.038). Conventional group comparisons of mean follow-up values showed no significant differences in any of the outcome variables. CONCLUSION: This trial could not confirm the hypothesized advantage of a cognitive-behavioural training programme over ordinary GP care in knee osteoarthritis pain patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64794760.

Multiple psychological factors are associated with poorer functioning in a sample of community-dwelling knee osteoarthritis patients.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis and imposes a heavy burden on individual welfare among elderly people. There is preliminary evidence that psychological factors play a role in functional ability and pain in knee OA patients, particularly with respect to the surgery outcome. Less is known about psychological factors among community-dwelling patients with knee OA. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine which psychological factors are associated with pain and functional ability among community-dwelling knee OA patients using a comprehensive set of psychological questionnaires. METHODS: In the cross-sectional baseline setting of a prospective, randomized controlled intervention study, 111 patients aged from 35 to 75 years with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading of knee OA were included. They completed a comprehensive set of psychological questionnaires, including measures of resources and coping, fear and catastrophizing, and distress. RESULTS: In cross-sectional comparisons, pain self-efficacy, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, and elevated anxiety were associated with pain and a poorer functional ability. In logistic regression analysis, independent association was seen between pain self-efficacy and poorer functioning. Knee OA patients also reported elevated levels of anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal that both pain self-efficacy and negatively charged emotion and expectations toward pain are important factors when dealing with knee OA patients. Failure to consider these will probably contribute to prolonged disability and further pain. The results call for the routine assessment of multiple psychological factors in knee OA.

Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention for knee osteoarthritis pain: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis is the most common type of arthritis, with pain being its most common symptom. Little is known about the psychological aspects of knee osteoarthritis pain. There is an emerging consensus among osteoarthritis specialists about the importance of addressing not only biological but also psychosocial factors in the assessment and treatment of osteoarthritis. As few studies have evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on knee osteoarthritis pain, good quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine their effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: We intend to conduct a 6-week single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Altogether, 108 patients aged from 35 to 75 years with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading (KL 2-4) of knee osteoarthritis will be included. The clinical inclusion criteria are pain within the last year in or around the knee occurring on most days for at least one month, and knee pain of ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale in the WOMAC pain subscale for one week prior to study entry. Patients with any severe psychiatric disorder, other back or lower limb pain symptoms more aggravating than knee pain, or previous or planned lower extremity joint surgery will be excluded. The patients will be randomly assigned to a combined GP care and cognitive-behavioral intervention group (n = 54) or to a GP care control group (n = 54). The cognitive-behavioral intervention will consist of 6 weekly group sessions supervised by a psychologist and a physiotherapist experienced in the treatment of pain. The main goals of the intervention are to reduce maladaptive pain coping and to increase the self-management of pain and disability. The follow-up-points will be arranged at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome measure will be the WOMAC pain subscale. Secondary outcome measures will include self-reports of pain and physical function, a health related quality of life questionnaire, and various psychological questionnaires. Personnel responsible of the data analysis will be blinded. DISCUSSION: This study addresses the current topic of non-pharmacological conservative treatment of knee OA-related pain. We anticipate that these results will provide important new insights to the current care recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64794760.

Far from easy and accurate - detection of metabolic syndrome by general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major public health challenge. General practitioners (GPs) could play a key role in its recognition. However, it often remains undiagnosed in primary care. This study assesses how well GPs and patients recognise MetS among patients with coronary heart disease or at least one of its risk factors. METHODS: Twenty-six health centres around Finland were randomly selected for the purpose of identifying, over a two-week period in April 2005, patients meeting the inclusion criteria of coronary heart disease or one of its risk factors. GPs and identified patients (n = 1880) were asked to complete surveys that included a question about the patient's MetS status. A trained nurse conducted health checks (n = 1180) of the identified patients, utilising criteria of MetS modified from the National Cholesterol Program. Data from the GPs' survey were compared with those from the health check to establish the extent of congruence of identification of MetS. RESULTS: Almost half (49.4%) of the patients met the criteria of MetS as established by objective measures. However, in the GPs' survey responses, only 28.5% of the patients were identified as having MetS. Additionally, these groups of MetS patients were not congruent. The sensitivity of the GPs' diagnosis of MetS was 0.31 with a specificity of 0.73. Only 7.1% of the study patients stated that they were suffering from MetS. CONCLUSION: Detection of MetS is inaccurate among GPs in Finland. Most patients were not aware of having MetS. The practical relevance of MetS in primary care should be reconsidered.