Duration of anti-HER2 blockage therapy may improve survival in HER2 positive metastatic breast carcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: The duration of anti-HER2 blockage therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the anti-HER2 blockage therapy duration and other factors on survival in HER2 positive metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) patients. METHODS: The medical records of 193 HER2 positive MBC patients, who did not have the opportunity to receive adjuvant trastuzumab therapy but had received trastuzumab in the metastatic setting were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 45.0 years (range 21-83). Ninety-two (47.7%) patients received palliative trastuzumab < 6 months median, whereas 101 patients received trastuzumab ≥ 6 months median. The median number of trastuzumab cycles was 8 (range 1-51). Median survival after breast cancer recurrence was 31.0 months (range 24.3-37.7). The duration of trastuzumab therapy had a significant impact on the prognosis of recurrent breast cancer (22.0 vs 49.0 months, for ≤ 6 months of treatment duration, respectively; p<0.0001). Survival after breast cancer recurrence for the patients who received lapatinib plus capecitabine vs those who did not was significantly different (59 patients, p=0.005). Moreover, there was a statistically significant relationship between prolonged lapatinib plus capecitabine combination therapy and improved survival after disease recurrence (p=0.022). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, treatment with trastuzumab > 6 months (p=0.003) was the only independent prognostic factor for survival after breast cancer recurrence. CONCLUSION: The duration of anti-HER2 blockage therapies, especially with trastuzumab, seems to improve survival of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who were not previously treated with adjuvant trastuzumab, regardless of other therapies.

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced disease. Systemic chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer has limited impact on overall survival (OS). Patients eligible for chemotherapy should be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic factors for OS in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with first-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 343 locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who were treated with gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy between December 2000 and June 2011. Fifteen potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with OS. Univariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to determine prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among the 15 variables of univariate analysis, 6 were identified to have prognostic significance: stage (p<0.001), cholestasis (p=0.02), weight loss, prior pancreatectomy, serum CEA level (p<0.001) and serum CA19-9 level (p>0.001). In addition, age, chemotherapy and liver metastasis were of borderline significance (p=0.06). Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) included the 6 significant prognostic factors of univariate analysis and showed that stage was independent prognostic factor for OS, as were weight loss, and serum CEA level. CONCLUSION: Stage, weight loss, and serum CEA level were identified as important prognostic factors for OS in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. These findings may also facilitate pretreatment prediction of OS and can be used for selecting patients for treatment.

Gemcitabine alone versus combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of multicenter study.

The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer is of advanced disease. Several randomized Phase II and III trials suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) response rates were higher than Gemcitabine (Gem) alone, however the trials were not enough powered to indicate a statistically significant prolongation of survival in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study is to evaluated the efficiency of Gem alone versus GemCis in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma .A total of 406 patients, from fourteen centers were evaluated retrospectively. All patients received Gem or GemCis as first-line treatment between September 2005 to March 2011. Primary end of this study were to evaluate the toxicity, clinical response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the arms. There were 156 patients (M: 98, F: 58) in Gem arm and 250 patients (M: 175, F: 75) in the combination arm. Gemcitabin arm patients older than the combination arm ( median 63 vs 57.5, p=0.001). In patients with the combination arm had a higher dose reduction (25.2% vs 11.3%, p=0.001) and dose delay (34% vs 16.8%, p=0.001). Among patients with the combination and Gemcitabin arm gender, diabetes mellitus, performance status, cholestasis, grade, stage did not have a statistically difference (p>0.05). Clinical response rate to the combination arm was higher than the Gem arm (69.0% vs 49.7%, p=0.001). PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance (8.9 vs 6.0, p=0.08). OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm (12.0 vs 10.2, p>0.05). Grade III-IV hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were higher in the combination arm. PFS was more favorable in the GemCis arm than Gem alone, but the difference did not attain statistical significance. OS was not significantly superior in the GemCis arm.