The Effect of Delay Following the Clinical Decision to Perform Tracheostomy in the Critical Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy in patients who are critically ill is generally performed due to prolonged mechanical ventilation and expected extubation failure. However, tracheostomy criteria and ideal timing are poorly defined, including equivocal data from randomized controlled trials and median intubation to tracheostomy times that range from 7-21 d. However, a consistent finding is that only ∼50% of late tracheostomy groups actually undergo tracheostomy, with non-performance due to recovery or clinical deterioration. Unlike in many jurisdictions, elective surgical procedures in our institution require a court-appointed guardian, which necessitates an approximately 1-week delay between the decision to perform tracheostomy and surgery. This offers a unique opportunity to observe patients with potential tracheostomy during a delay between the decision and the performance. METHODS: ICU patients who were ventilated were identified for inclusion retrospectively by an application for guardianship relating to tracheostomy, the intention-to-treat point. The main outcomes of tracheostomy, extubation, or death/palliative care after inclusion were noted. Demographics, outcomes, and event timing were compared for the 3 outcome groups. RESULTS: Tracheostomy-related guardianship requests were made for 388 subjects. Of these, 195 (50%) underwent tracheostomy, whereas 127 (33%) were extubated and 66 (17%) either died before tracheostomy (46 [12%]) or were transitioned to palliative care (20 [5%]). The median time (interquartile range) from guardianship request until a defining event was the following: 6.2 (4.0-11) d for tracheostomy, 5.0 (2.9-8.2) d for extubation (P < .001 as compared to tracheostomy group), and 6.5 (2.5-11) d for death/palliative care (P = .55 as compared to tracheostomy). Neurological admissions were more common in the tracheostomy group and less common in the palliative group. Other admission demographics and hospitalization characteristics were similar. Hospital mortality was higher for subjects undergoing tracheostomy (58/195 [30%]) versus extubation (24/127 [19%]) (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Delay in performing tracheostomy due to legal requirements was associated with a 50% decrease in the need for tracheostomy. This suggests that decision-making with regard to ideal tracheostomy timing could be improved, saving unnecessary procedures.

Multiorgan failure in patients after out of hospital resuscitation: a retrospective single center study.

BACKGROUND: Information on extracerebral system dysfunction is important for assessing the needs of critically ill patients after cardiac arrest. AIMS: To describe the prevalence of organ dysfunction and patient severity after out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) using scores commonly used in intensive care and the association between these and mortality. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of observational data collected in real time in a tertiary medical center where care withdrawal is mostly illegal. Adult patients after nontraumatic OHCA with ROSC who survived for more than two hours were included. Primary outcome-prevalence of organ failure, based on common definitions for organ dysfunction, in the 1 days of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes-rates of survival to hospital discharge and survival with a good neurological outcome (CPC 1 or 2), and associations between organ dysfunction SOFA and APACHE-II scores and outcomes. Associations were assessed using fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney and T test for continuous variables. Multivariable models were also constructed for all measurements showing associations in previous tests. For severity scores compatibility, we used receiver-operating curve (ROC). RESULTS: Overall 369 patients (median age 75 years, 65% male) were included. Most arrests (64%) were witnessed, bystander CPR was provided in 15%. Median call to arrival time was 4 min. The presenting rhythm was asystole in 48% and VT/VF in 22%. Cardiovascular causes of arrest predominated (48%, n = 178). The median length of hospitalization was 5 days. Overall 28% of the patients (n = 98) survived to hospital discharge, mostly with a good neurological status (18.7%, n = 57). The rates of organ dysfunction were: hemodynamic instability 65% (n = 247), respiratory dysfunction 94% (n = 296), kidney dysfunction 70% (n = 259), hepatic dysfunction 14% (n = 50). The median SOFA score on day 1 was 9 and the median APACHE II score was 34. Modeling was limited by missing data. Neurological dysfunction (i.e. GCS and seizures) and kidney injury were consistently correlated with the outcomes in the multivariable models. Severity of critical illness assessed by above scoring systems correlated with mortality (all ROC curves had an AUC ranging between 0.728 and 0.849). CONCLUSIONS: Multiorgan failure is common after ROSC (1-4). Therefore, the management of patients after ROSC may require advanced multidisciplinary care. Scores describing the severity of critical illness should be routinely reported in resuscitation research. Our unique setting where withdrawal of care is illegal, allows assessment of extremely ill patients and may assist in defining margins for futility.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in obstetric patients: An Israeli nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The leading causes of maternal mortality include respiratory failure, cardiovascular events, infections, and hemorrhages. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as rescue therapy in the peripartum period for cardiopulmonary failure is expanding in critical care medicine. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted on a nationwide cohort in Israel. During the 3-year period, between September 1, 2019, and August 31, 2022, all women in the peripartum period who had been supported by ECMO for respiratory or circulatory failure at 10 large Israeli hospitals were identified. Indications for ECMO, maternal and neonatal outcomes, details of ECMO support, and complications were collected. RESULTS: During the 3-year study period, in Israel, there were 540 234 live births, and 28 obstetric patients were supported by ECMO, with an incidence of 5.2 cases per 100 000 or 1 case per 19 000 births (when excluding patients with COVID-19, the incidence will be 2.5 cases per 100 000 births). Of these, 25 were during the postpartum period, of which 16 (64%) were connected in the PPD1, and 3 were during pregnancy. Eighteen patients (64.3%) were supported by V-V ECMO, 9 (32.1%) by V-A ECMO, and one (3.6%) by a VV-A configuration. Hypoxic respiratory failure (ARDS) was the most common indication for ECMO, observed in 21 patients (75%). COVID-19 was the cause of ARDS in 15 (53.7%) patients. The indications for the V-A configuration were cardiomyopathy (3 patients), amniotic fluid embolism (2 patients), sepsis, and pulmonary hypertension. The maternal and fetal survival rates were 89.3% (n = 25) and 100% (n = 28). The average ECMO duration was 17.6 ± 18.6 days and the ICU stay was 29.8 ± 23.8 days. Major bleeding complications requiring surgical intervention were observed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of using ECMO in the peripartum period is low. The maternal and neonatal survival rates in patients treated with ECMO are high. These results show that ECMO remains an important treatment option for obstetric patients with respiratory and/or cardiopulmonary failure.

Altered somatic hypermutation patterns in COVID-19 patients classifies disease severity.

Introduction: The success of the human body in fighting SARS-CoV2 infection relies on lymphocytes and their antigen receptors. Identifying and characterizing clinically relevant receptors is of utmost importance. Methods: We report here the application of a machine learning approach, utilizing B cell receptor repertoire sequencing data from severely and mildly infected individuals with SARS-CoV2 compared with uninfected controls. Results: In contrast to previous studies, our approach successfully stratifies non-infected from infected individuals, as well as disease level of severity. The features that drive this classification are based on somatic hypermutation patterns, and point to alterations in the somatic hypermutation process in COVID-19 patients. Discussion: These features may be used to build and adapt therapeutic strategies to COVID-19, in particular to quantitatively assess potential diagnostic and therapeutic antibodies. These results constitute a proof of concept for future epidemiological challenges.

Distribution of Aeration and Pulmonary Blood Volume in Healthy, ARDS and COVID-19 Lungs: A Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Retrospective Cohort Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Few reports have studied lung aeration and perfusion in normal lungs, COVID-19, and ARDS from other causes (NC-ARDS) using dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (DE-CTPA). To describe lung aeration and blood-volume distribution using DE-CTPAs of patients with NC-ARDS, COVID-19, and controls with a normal DE-CTPA ("healthy lungs"). We hypothesized that each of these conditions has unique ranges of aeration and pulmonary blood volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study of DE-CTPAs included patients with COVID-19, NC-ARDS (Berlin criteria), and controls. Patients with macroscopic pulmonary embolisms were excluded. The outcomes studied were the (1) lung blood-volume in areas with different aeration levels (normal, ground glass opacities [GGO], consolidated lung) and (2) aeration/blood-volume ratios. RESULTS: Included were 20 patients with COVID-19 (10 milds, 10 moderate-severe), six with NC-ARDS, and 12 healthy-controls. Lung aeration was lowest in patients with severe COVID-19 24% (IQR13%-31%) followed by those with NC-ARDS 40%(IQR21%-46%). Blood-volume in GGO was lowest in patients with COVID-19 [moderate-severe:-28.6 (IQR-33.1-23.2); mild: -30.1 (IQR-33.3-23.4)] and highest in normally aerated areas in NC-ARDS -37.4 (IQR-52.5-30.2-) and moderate-severe COVID-19 -33.5(IQR-44.2-28.5). The median aeration/blood-volume ratio was lowest in severe COVID-19 but some values overlapped with those observed among patients with NC-ARDS. CONCLUSION: Severe COVID-19 disease is associated with low total aerated lung volume and blood-volume in areas with GGO and overall aeration/blood volume ratios, and with high blood volume in normal lung areas. In this hypothesis-generating study, these findings were most pronounced in severe COVID disease. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Anemia before in-hospital cardiac arrest and survival from cardio-pulmonary resuscitation-a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple patient-related variables have been associated with reduced rates of survival to hospital discharge (SHD) after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). As opposed to most of these, anemia may be reversible. This retrospective single-center study aims to examine the relationship between prearrest hemoglobin levels, comorbidities, and survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among patients with non-traumatic IHCA. Patients were classified as anemic (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) or non-anemic (hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL) based on their lowest hemoglobin measurement in the 48 h preceding the arrest. The primary outcome was SHD. The secondary outcome was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). RESULTS: Of 1515 CPR reports screened, 773 patients were included. Half of the patients (50.5%, 390) were classified as anemic. Anemic patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Indices (CCIs), less cardiac causes, and more metabolic causes for the arrest. An inverse association was found between CCI and lowest hemoglobin. Overall, 9.1% (70 patients) achieved SHD and 49.5% (383) achieved ROSC. Similar rates of SHD (7.3 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.118) and ROSC (49.5 vs. 51.0%, p = 0.688) were observed in anemic and non-anemic patients. These findings remained consistent after adjustment for comorbidities, in sensitivity analyses on the independent variable (i.e., hemoglobin) and on potential confounders and in subgroups based on sex or blood transfusion in the 72 h preceding the arrest. CONCLUSIONS: Prearrest hemoglobin levels lower than 10 g/dL were not associated with lower rates of SHD or ROSC in IHCA patients after controlling for comorbidities. Further studies are required to confirm our findings and to establish whether post-arrest hemoglobin levels reflect the severity of the inflammatory post-resuscitation processes.

Experimental and Compassionate Drug Use During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: Concomitant experimental/compassionate drug administration has been all-pervasive in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. The objective of this study was to study the relationship between patient severity, the number of experimental/compassionate medications received (main outcome measure), and patient outcomes [survival to hospital discharge and length of hospital stay (LOS)]. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data collected in real time during the first pandemic wave in a tertiary care hospital. Data included patient demographics, comorbidities, admission vital signs, laboratory values, most extreme respiratory intervention during hospitalization, and data regarding treatment with compassionate/experimental drugs during their stay. RESULTS: Overall, 292 PCR-confirmed patients with symptoms of COVID-19 were studied (March/April, 2020). Increasing respiratory support correlated with both LOS and mortality. Patients were more likely to receive more than 1 experimental/compassionate drugs as respiratory support escalated, ranging from 3% (n = 4/136) among patients on room air to 77.3% (n = 17/22) of mechanically ventilated/ECMO patients (P < 0.001, linear by linear association). The mean number of experimental/compassionate drugs received also increased with escalating respiratory support (P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA). After adjustment for severity of patient condition, administration of more experimental/compassionate drugs was unrelated to survival (P = 0.24), but was related to increased LOS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients that were hospitalized in worse condition were more likely to receive more experimental/compassionate drugs. Treatment was unrelated to survival but may have been related to LOS. This finding raises questions regarding the results of studies on medication effects that adjusted for multiple drug administration.

Predictors of Hypoxemia and Related Adverse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: A Double-Center Retrospective Study.

Hypoxemia is a hallmark of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity. We sought to determine predictors of hypoxemia and related adverse outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the two largest hospitals in Jerusalem, Israel, from 9 March through 16 July 2020. Patients were categorized as those who developed reduced (<94%) vs. preserved (≥94%) arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) within the first 48 h after arrival to the emergency department. Overall, 492 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with reduced SpO2 were significantly older, had more comorbidities, higher body surface area (BSA) and body mass index (BMI), lower lymphocyte counts, impaired renal function, and elevated liver enzymes, c-reactive protein (CRP), and D-dimer levels as compared to those with preserved SpO2. In the multivariable regression analysis, older age (odds ratio (OR) 1.02 per year, p < 0.001), higher BSA (OR 1.16 per 0.10 m2, p = 0.003) or BMI (OR 1.05 per 1 kg/m2, p = 0.011), lower lymphocyte counts (OR 1.72 per 1 × 103/µL decrease, p = 0.002), and elevated CRP (1.11 per 1 mg/dL increase, p < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of low SpO2. Severe hypoxemia requiring ventilatory support, older age, and pre-existing comorbidities, including underlying renal dysfunction and heart failure, were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. These findings suggest that assessment of predictors of hypoxemia early at the time of hospitalization with COVID-19 may be helpful in risk stratification and management.

Vasopressor and inotrope treatment for septic shock: An umbrella review of reviews.

PURPOSE: To review the characteristics, findings and quality of systematic reviews (SRs) on the effect of any vasopressor/inotrope on outcomes in adult patients with sepsis compared with either no treatment, another vasopressor or inotrope or fluids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed and Embase (January 1993-March 2021). Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Among the 28 SRs identified, mortality was the primary outcome in most (26/28) and mortality was usually (23/28) studied using randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Fifteen SRs focused exclusively on patients with sepsis or septic shock. Sepsis and septic shock were always grouped for the analysis. Publication bias was consistently low when studied. The most consistent findings were a survival advantage with norepinephrine versus dopamine, which disappeared in analyses restricted to 28-day mortality, and more arrhythmias with dopamine. However, these analyses were dominated by a single study. Only 2 SRs were judged to be of moderate-high quality. Lack of blinding and attrition bias may have affected the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of SRs on the effect of vasopressors/inotropes on the outcomes of adult patients with sepsis can be improved, but high-quality, multicenter, RCTs should be preferred to additional SRs on this topic.

Severity of shock, rate of physiological stabilization and organ failure in healthy women admitted to the intensive care unit following major peripartum hemorrhage: A retrospective, descriptive study.

PURPOSE: To describe shock severity, physiological stabilization and organ failure in healthy women admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after major peripartum hemorrhage (PPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, single center study. RESULTS: Twenty-nine women median age 33 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30-36) and gravidity 5 pregnancies (IQR 3-9) were studied. One woman died. The median maternal admission hematocrit was 28.8 (IQR 25.7-32.4). Median transfusion rates were nine units of packed red blood cells (IQR 7-12.25), eight fresh frozen plasma (IQR 6-12), 17 platelets (IQR 10-22) and 15 cryoprecipitate (IQR 9.75-20). Blood pressure dropped significantly in the six hours following ICU admission. Nonetheless, lactate decreased from 3.23 mmol/L to 1.54 mmol/L within 24 h of ICU admission, renal and pulmonary function were unaffected and coagulopathy was never observed. Two-thirds of the women underwent hysterectomy. One-third underwent repeated surgery. The median length of ICU stay was <48 h and that of mechanical ventilation was <24 h. Increased transfusion rates correlated with lengthier ICU admission (p ≤ 0.01 regardless of blood product). CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing hemorrhage in women with severe PPH manifests subtly and often requires active intervention. Hemorrhage control is required to achieve physiological stabilization and minimize organ damage.

Cardiac arrhythmias amongst hospitalised Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) patients: Prevalence, characterisation, and clinical algorithm to classify arrhythmic risk.

OBJECTIVES: A significant proportion of COVID-19 patients may have cardiac involvement including arrhythmias. Although arrhythmia characterisation and possible predictors were previously reported, there are conflicting data regarding the exact prevalence of arrhythmias. Clinically applicable algorithms to classify COVID patients' arrhythmic risk are still lacking, and are the aim of our study. METHODS: We describe a single-centre cohort of hospitalised patients with a positive nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 during the initial Israeli outbreak between 1/2/2020 and 30/5/2020. The study's outcome was any documented arrhythmia during hospitalisation, based on daily physical examination, routine ECG's, periodic 24-hour Holter, and continuous monitoring. Multivariate analysis was used to find predictors for new arrhythmias and create classification trees for discriminating patients with high and low arrhythmic risk. RESULTS: Out of 390 COVID-19 patients included, 28 (7.2%) had documented arrhythmias during hospitalisation, including 23 atrial tachyarrhythmias, combined atrial fibrillation (AF), and ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia storm, and 3 bradyarrhythmias. Only 7/28 patients had previous arrhythmias. Our study showed a significant correlation between disease severity and arrhythmia prevalence (P < .001) with a low arrhythmic prevalence amongst mild disease patients (2%). Multivariate analysis revealed background heart failure (CHF) and disease severity are independently associated with overall arrhythmia while age, CHF, disease severity, and arrhythmic symptoms are associated with tachyarrhythmias. A novel decision tree using age, disease severity, CHF, and troponin levels was created to stratify patients into high and low risk for developing arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: Dominant arrhythmia amongst COVID-19 patients is AF. Arrhythmia prevalence is associated with age, disease severity, CHF, and troponin levels. A novel simple Classification tree, based on these parameters, can discriminate between high and low arrhythmic risk patients.

The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline.

PURPOSE: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a relatively recent respiratory support technique which delivers high flow, heated and humidified controlled concentration of oxygen via the nasal route. Recently, its use has increased for a variety of clinical indications. To guide clinical practice, we developed evidence-based recommendations regarding use of HFNC in various clinical settings. METHODS: We formed a guideline panel composed of clinicians, methodologists and experts in respiratory medicine. Using GRADE, the panel developed recommendations for four actionable questions. RESULTS: The guideline panel made a strong recommendation for HFNC in hypoxemic respiratory failure compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) (moderate certainty), a conditional recommendation for HFNC following extubation (moderate certainty), no recommendation regarding HFNC in the peri-intubation period (moderate certainty), and a conditional recommendation for postoperative HFNC in high risk and/or obese patients following cardiac or thoracic surgery (moderate certainty). CONCLUSIONS: This clinical practice guideline synthesizes current best-evidence into four recommendations for HFNC use in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, following extubation, in the peri-intubation period, and postoperatively for bedside clinicians.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy or Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately Postextubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Reintubation after failed extubation is associated with increased mortality and longer hospital length of stay. Noninvasive oxygenation modalities may prevent reintubation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula after extubation in critically ill adults. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials comparing high-flow nasal cannula to other noninvasive methods of oxygen delivery after extubation in critically ill adults. DATA EXTRACTION: We included the following outcomes: reintubation, postextubation respiratory failure, mortality, use of noninvasive ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, complications, and comfort. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included eight randomized controlled trials (n = 1,594 patients). Compared with conventional oxygen therapy, high-flow nasal cannula decreased reintubation (relative risk, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.70; moderate certainty) and postextubation respiratory failure (relative risk, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.91; very low certainty), but had no effect on mortality (relative risk, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.57-1.52; moderate certainty), or ICU length of stay (mean difference, 0.05 d fewer; 95% CI, 0.83 d fewer to 0.73 d more; high certainty). High-flow nasal cannula may decrease use of noninvasive ventilation (relative risk, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.34-1.22; moderate certainty) and hospital length of stay (mean difference, 0.98 d fewer; 95% CI, 2.16 d fewer to 0.21 d more; moderate certainty) compared with conventional oxygen therapy, however, certainty was limited by imprecision. Compared with noninvasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula had no effect on reintubation (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.86-1.57; low certainty), mortality (relative risk, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.82-1.53; moderate certainty), or postextubation respiratory failure (relative risk, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48-1.41; very low certainty). High-flow nasal cannula may reduce ICU length of stay (moderate certainty) and hospital length of stay (moderate certainty) compared with noninvasive ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: High-flow nasal cannula reduces reintubation compared with conventional oxygen therapy, but not compared with noninvasive ventilation after extubation.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula in the Immediate Postoperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) prevents intubation in acute hypoxic respiratory failure when compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT). However, the data examining routine HFNC use in the immediate postoperative period are less clear. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is routine HFNC use superior to COT or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use in preventing intubation in patients postoperatively? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We comprehensively searched databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of HFNC use with that of COT or NIV in the immediate postoperative period on reintubation, escalation of respiratory support, hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative hypoxemia, and treatment complications. We assessed individual study risk of bias (RoB) by using the revised Cochrane RoB 2 tool and rated certainty in outcomes by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. RESULTS: We included 11 RCTs enrolling 2,201 patients. Ten compared HFNC with COT and one with NIV. Compared with COT use, HFNC use in the postoperative period was associated with a lower reintubation rate (relative risk [RR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12-0.88; absolute risk reduction [ARR], 2.9%; moderate certainty) and decreased escalation of respiratory support (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.94; ARR, 5.8%; very low certainty). Post hoc subgroup analysis suggested that this effect was driven by patients who were obese and/or at high risk (subgroup differences, P = .06). We did not find differences in any of the other stated outcomes between HFNC and COT. HFNC was also no different from NIV in reintubation rate, respiratory therapy failure, or ICU LOS. INTERPRETATION: With evidence of moderate certainty, prophylactic HFNC reduces reintubation and escalation of respiratory support compared with COT in the immediate postoperative period after cardiothoracic surgery. This effect is likely driven by patients who are at high risk and/or obese. These findings support postoperative prophylactic HFNC use in the patients who are at high risk and/or obese undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

Association between night/after-hours surgery and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between night/after-hours surgery and patients' mortality is unclear. METHODS: The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019128534). We searched Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE from inception until August 29, 2019 for studies examining an association between timing of surgical procedures (time of anaesthesia induction or surgery start) and mortality (within 30 days or in-hospital) in adult patients. Studies reporting patients' mortality after surgery performed during the weekend only were excluded. All analyses were done using the random-effects model. RESULTS: We included 40 observational studies (36 retrospective and four prospective) that examined a total of 2 957 065 patients. Twenty-eight studies were judged of good quality and 12 of poor quality according to Newcastle-Ottawa score, owing to a lack of adequate comparability between study groups. Primary analysis from adjusted estimates demonstrated as association between night/after-hours surgery and a higher risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]=1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.28; P=0.002; number of studies=18; I2=67%) based on low certainty evidence. Analysis from unadjusted estimates demonstrated a consistent association (OR=1.47; 95% CI, 1.19-1.83; P=0.0005; studies=38, I2=97%; low certainty). The number of centres per study had no credible subgroup effect on the association between the time of surgery and mortality. We were unable to evaluate the subgroup effect of urgency of surgery because of high heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Night/after-hours surgery may be associated with a higher risk of mortality. Patients' and surgical characteristics seem not to completely explain this finding. However, the certainty of the evidence was low.

A Retrospective Study of Short-term versus Long-term Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula after Extubation in the Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: The use of a high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was examined for different clinical indications in the critically ill. OBJECTIVES: To describe a single center experience with HFNC in post-extubation critical care patients by using clinical indices. METHODS: In this single center study, the authors retrospectively evaluated the outcome of patients who were connected to the HFNC after their extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU). At 48 hours after the extubation, the patients were divided into three groups: the group weaned from HFNC, the ongoing HFNC group, and the already intubated group. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients who were included, 42 patients were without HFNC support at 48 hours after extubation, 22 and 16 patients were with ongoing HFNC support and already intubated by this time frame, respectively. The mean ROX index (the ratio of SpO2 divided by fraction of inspired oxygen to respiratory rate) at 6 hours of the weaned group was 12.3 versus 9.3 in the ongoing HFNC group, and 8.5 in the reintubated group (P = 0.02). The groups were significantly different by the ICU length of stay, tracheostomy rate, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with HFNC post-extubation of those who had a higher ROX index were less likely to undergo reintubation.

Moderate Certainty Evidence Suggests the Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Does Not Decrease Hypoxia When Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy in the Peri-Intubation Period: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The role of high-flow nasal cannula during and before intubation is unclear despite a number of randomized clinical trials. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the benefits of high-flow nasal cannula in the peri-intubation period. DATA SOURCES: We performed a comprehensive search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials that compared high-flow nasal cannula to other noninvasive oxygen delivery systems in the peri-intubation period. DATA EXTRACTION: Our primary outcome was severe desaturation (defined as peripheral oxygen saturation reading < 80% during intubation). Secondary outcomes included peri-intubation complications, apneic time, PaO2 before and after intubation, PaCO2 after intubation, ICU length of stay, and short-term mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 10 randomized clinical trials (n = 1,017 patients). High-flow nasal cannula had no effect on the occurrence rate of peri-intubation hypoxemia (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.68-1.42; 0.3% absolute risk reduction, moderate certainty), serious complications (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06), apneic time (mean difference, 10.3 s higher with high-flow nasal cannula; 95% CI, 11.0 s lower to 31.7 s higher), PaO2 measured after preoxygenation (mean difference, 3.6 mm Hg higher; 95% CI, 3.5 mm Hg lower to 10.7 mm Hg higher), or PaO2 measured after intubation (mean difference, 27.0 mm Hg higher; 95% CI, 13.2 mm Hg lower to 67.2 mm Hg higher), when compared with conventional oxygen therapy. There was also no effect on postintubation PaCO2, ICU length of stay, or 28-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate-to-low certainty evidence that the use of high-flow nasal cannula likely has no effect on severe desaturation, serious complications, apneic time, oxygenation, ICU length of stay, or overall survival when used in the peri-intubation period when compared with conventional oxygen therapy.

The Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Outside the ICU.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is a routine, evidence-based treatment in the ICU. Due to its ease of application, non-evidence-based use of HFNC has spread to non-ICU wards. This study reports on the experience with HFNC outside the ICU. METHODS: This is an observational study of HFNC prescribed by treating physicians in non-ICU areas. Primary outcomes included change in dyspnea visual analog scale score and physiological variables both before and 30 min after initiation of HFNC treatment. Secondary outcomes included mortality, ICU admission, and intubation. RESULTS: We observed decreased median (interquartile range) visual analog scale scores after initiation of HFNC: 8 (6-9) versus 5 (4-6) (P < .001) in 90 of 111 subjects (81%, 95% CI 72.5-87.9%, P < .001). Breathing frequency (31 ± 10 vs 26 ± 7 breaths/min, P < .001) and saturation (84 ± 12% vs 94 ± 5%, P < .001) also improved. Overall cohort mortality was 55 of 111 subjects (50%); however, 41 of 111 subjects (33%) had a do not resuscitate (DNR) order. Among 70 non-DNR subjects, early mortality (< 72 h) occurred in 9 of 70 subjects (13%), and late mortality in 12 of 70 subjects (17%). The composite end point (ie, discharged alive, non-intubated, not admitted to ICU) was met by 35 of 70 subjects (50%) without a DNR order. An increased ROX index ([SpO2 /FIO2 ]/breathing frequency) was the only independent predictor associated with achieving the composite outcome (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.1-2.0, P = .01). Higher pre-connection visual analog scale score (odds ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.35-2.28, P < .001) and a history of respiratory disease (odds ratio 3.52, 95% CI 1.27-9.72, P = .01) were predictors of greater improvement in dyspnea with HFNC. No variable predicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HFNC outside the ICU was associated with improved visual analog scale score, breathing frequency, and saturation but with a relatively high mortality, even in non-DNR subjects. HFNC was used in many subjects who had a DNR order. This therapy may have been palliative in intent. Care should be exercised in using this therapy in a setting that is not continuously monitored.