Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Med Qual ; 29(5): 397-402, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24061867

RESUMO

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common, lethal, and expensive. Little is known about optimal strategies to evaluate process measures for VAP prevention. The authors conducted a prospective study of different sampling strategies for evaluating head of bed (HOB) elevation and oral care. There was no significant difference between morning and evening shift HOB elevation compliance rates (P = .47). If oral care was performed at least once during a 12-hour shift, there was an 87% probability that it also was performed at least twice. If oral care was performed at least twice during a 12-hour shift, then there was a 93% probability that chlorhexidine oral care was performed at least once. The results of this study suggest that sampling HOB elevation twice as compared with once daily is unlikely to change the estimate of performance, oral care need not be frequently sampled, and high oral care compliance may predict chlorhexidine oral care compliance.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Desinfetantes/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...