Narrative review of nephron-sparing surgical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: is there a role for distal ureterectomy, segmental ureterectomy, and partial nephrectomy.

Background and Objective: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare malignancy and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision (BCE) is considered as the standard of care for high-risk non-metastatic disease. Loss of the renal unit secondary to RNU, especially in elderly patients, causes significant decline in overall renal function which in turn negatively impacts the overall survival (OS). Such radical surgeries can be spared in a select group of the patients with segmental ureterectomy (SU) or distal ureterectomy to salvage the ipsilateral kidney. In this article, we will review the oncological and renal function outcomes following such procedures. This review excludes endourologic procedures. Methods: This is a non-systematic review of the published literature focusing on the nephron-sparing surgical alternatives for the management of UTUCs. The following texts were used for literature search: "nephron-sparing surgery", "segmental ureterectomy", "total ureterectomy", "partial nephrectomy", and "ileal ureter". We included the articles indexed in PubMed, written in English language, and published within the last 15 years. Key Content and Findings: The main argument against the utilization of these procedures is the lack of high quality, level I evidence, which is due to the rarity of this disease and the rates of ipsilateral recurrences. Despite that, the evidence in support of these nephron-sparing surgical alternatives is increasing over time. Published literature including single/multi-centric studies & systematic reviews, suggests comparable oncological outcomes and significantly improved renal function preservation. Lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of nephron-sparing surgical alternatives is largely underutilized. Similarly, the role of neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following such procedures is also not established currently. Conclusions: With comparable oncological outcomes while preserving renal function, the nephron-sparing surgical alternatives to RNU are gaining momentum. These options can be offered to patients with low volume, localized UTUC with imperative indication for renal preservation such as solitary kidney, compromised baseline, and expected significant decline in post-RNU renal function without compromising oncological principles during surgery.

Creation of a Novel, Race-Adjusted, and Risk-Adapted Scoring System to Predict Positive Surgical Margins and Prolonged Operative Time During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.

Objectives: To compare racial differences and pelvis dimensions between Caucasians and African Americans (AAs) and to develop a risk calculator and scoring system to predict the risk of prolonged operative time and presence of positive surgical margins (PSM) based on these dimensions. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 88 consecutive patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with a preoperative prostate MRI conducted. Data extraction included demographic, perioperative, and postoperative oncologic outcomes. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was obtained within 3 months postsurgery. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare continuous and categorical data, respectively. Single and multivariable regression analysis were used to determine contribution of each factor to the composite outcomes. A risk score was created based on this analysis for predicting the composite outcome. Results: We identified 88 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer that underwent a preoperative prostate MRI. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to age, body mass index, or any postoperative outcome. PSA was lower at diagnosis (6.49 vs 9.72, p = 0.006) and operative times were shorter in Caucasians. Rates of PSM (13 vs 14, p = 0.35), biochemical recurrence (4 vs 2, p = 0.69), and complications did not vary between the groups. Caucasians had wider/shallower pelvis dimensions. Based on these variables, we found that the log (odds of OR time >3 hours or PSM) = -5.333 + 1.158 (if AA) +0.105 × PSA +0.076 × F -0.035 × G with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.73. Using the predefined variables, patients can be risk stratified for PSM or prolonged operative times. Conclusions: Several pelvis dimensions were found to be shorter/narrower in AAs and were associated with longer operative times. The presented risk calculator and stratification system may be used to predict prolonged operative time or having PSM.

Technologic advances in robot-assisted nephron sparing surgery: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) is the preferred management for clinical stage T1 (cT1) renal masses. In recent years, indications have expanded to larger and more complex renal tumors. In an effort to provide optimal patient outcomes, urologists strive to achieve the pentafecta when performing partial nephrectomy. This has led to the continuous technologic advancement and technique refinement including the use of augmented reality, ultrasound techniques, changes in surgical approach and reconstruction, uses of novel fluorescence marker guided imaging, and implementation of early recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the recent advances in pre-, intra-, and post-operative management and approaches to managing patients with renal masses undergoing NSS. Methods: We performed a non-systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE for the most relevant articles pertaining to the outlined topics from 2010 to 2022 without limitation on study design. We included only full-text English articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Key Content and Findings: Partial nephrectomy is currently prioritized for cT1a renal masses; however, indications have been expanding due to a greater understanding of anatomy and technologic advances. Recent studies have demonstrated that improvements in imaging techniques utilizing cross-sectional imaging with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, use of color doppler intraoperative ultrasound, and newer studies emerging using contrast enhanced ultrasound play important roles in certain subsets of patients. While indocyanine green administration is commonly used, novel fluorescence-guided imaging including folate receptor-targeting fluorescence molecules are being investigated to better delineate tumor-parenchyma margins. Augmented reality has a developing role in patient and surgical trainee education. While pre-and intra-operative imaging have shown to be promising, near infrared guided segmental and sub-segmental vessel clamping has yet to show significant benefit in patient outcomes. Studies regarding reconstructive techniques and replacement of reconstruction with sealing agents have a promising future. Finally, ERAS protocols have allowed earlier discharge of patients without increasing complications while improving cost burden. Conclusions: Advances in NSS have ranged from pre-operative imaging techniques to ERAS protocols Further prospective investigations are required to determine the impact of novel imaging, in-vivo fluorescence biomarker use, and reconstructive techniques on achieving the pentafecta of NSS.

Robotic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract urothelial cancer: inching toward standard of care?

Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy. Current guidelines strongly recommend radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template-based lymph node dissection for all high-risk upper-tract urothelial carcinomas. Although the open approach is still considered the standard of care, evolution of minimally invasive approaches especially the robotic-assisted approach, has been found to be oncologically equivalent. Since its initial description in 2006, the surgical technique as well as the robotic surgical system has gone through a major evolution. With well-established advantages of the minimally invasive approach, robotic radical nephroureterectomy also has the ability to address both upper and lower urinary tract simultaneously without the need of patient repositioning, standardized single docking technique, ease of performing crucial steps like excision of ureterovesical junction and bladder cuff with watertight cystotomy closure, allowing perioperative instillation of intra-vesical chemotherapy. Robot-assisted radical nephro-ureterectomy and template-based lymph node dissection is gradually emerging as the current standard of care to achieve the best possible oncologic and functional outcomes. In this review article we are focusing on the evolution of this approach in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma along with a review of oncologic outcomes.

Transmesocolic robot-assisted pyeloplasty: single center experience.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the technical feasibility of the transmesocolic approach of robotic pyeloplasty for left ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2006 and December 2007, 60 patients underwent robot-assisted pyeloplasty that included 33 cases on the right side and 27 cases on the left side. Of the 27 left-side cases, 24 were performed using a transmesocolic approach. Three left-side surgeries were performed by mobilizing the colon because of associated accessory vessel and renal calculi. A pure robot-assisted dismembered reduction pyeloplasty with excision of the ureteropelvic junction was performed in all cases. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 125.33 minutes. The time to perform the anastomosis was 43.58 minutes, and mean blood loss 38.7 mL. Average hospital stay was 2.5 days, and the drain was removed within 48 hours. One patient had prolonged drainage with fever because of a misplaced ureteral stent. Of the 24 patients, 23 were followed for 1 year and 1 was lost to follow-up. No patient demonstrated clinical or radiographic evidence of repeated obstruction. CONCLUSION: In the transmesocolic approach, mobilization of the colon is not necessary, and the UPJO can be approached directly after incising the mesocolon. This approach is safe and feasible in patients with a thin mesentry and when extensive mobilization of the kidney is not needed for any associated problems. The technique is highly effective with durable success rates similar to those of open surgery.

Cost-effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LPP) is a minimally invasive treatment option for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. We report here our experience of performing cost-effective LPP on 24 patients at a single center. METHODS: Between October 1999 and March 2002, LPP was performed in 24 patients (17 male, seven female; age range 8-51 years) including two patients who had failed previous endourologic treatments. In two patients with concomitant renal stones, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy was also performed. LPP was conducted in a cost-reductive manner by both transperitoneal (n = 12) and retroperitoneal (n = 12) access. To reduce the cost, an indigenous balloon to create the retroperitoneal space, reusable ports, ordinary polyglactin suture and intracorporeal free-hand suturing were employed. To reduce operative time, antegrade stenting was also performed in some cases. RESULTS: Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed in 16, Foley Y-V pyeloplasty in five and Fenger pyeloplasty in three patients. One patient required conversion to open surgery due to tension at the anastomosis site during Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. The mean operating time, blood loss, analgesic (pethidine) requirement, duration of drain and hospital stay for the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal groups were 170.3 and 187.6 min, 102.2 and 145.9 mL, 125 and 136.4 mg, 2.1 and 2.5 days, and 3.4 and 4.3 days, respectively. No significant complications were encountered apart from prolonged ileus in three patients in the transperitoneal group. The mean follow-up period was 10.8 months with a range of 2-24 months. Postoperative renal scan was performed at 3 months in 21 patients, and 1 year in 11 patients. There was evidence of equivocal obstruction in one patient, but there were no obstructions in the remaining patients. CONCLUSION: Although LPP is technically demanding, it is emerging as a viable, minimally invasive alternative to open pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction with a success rate similar to that of open pyeloplasty. It allows the duplication of open surgery steps (unlike endoscopic procedures), thereby providing durable and sustained results. LPP can also be performed safely, effectively and efficiently in a cost-efficient manner.