Using verbal autopsy to ascertain perinatal cause of death: are trained non-physicians adequate?

OBJECTIVES: To develop a standardized verbal autopsy (VA) training program and evaluate whether its implementation resulted in comparable knowledge required to classify perinatal cause of death (COD) by physicians and non-physicians. METHODS: Training materials, case studies, and written and mock scenarios for this VA program were developed using conventional VA and ICD-10 guidelines. This program was used to instruct physicians and non-physicians in VA methodology using a train-the-trainer model. Written tests of cognitive and applied knowledge required to classify perinatal COD were administered before and after training to evaluate the effect of the VA training program. RESULTS: Fifty-three physicians and non-physicians (nurse-midwives/nurses and Community Health Workers [CHW]) from Pakistan, Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Guatemala were trained. Cognitive and applied knowledge mean scores among all trainees improved significantly (12.8 and 28.8% respectively, P < 0.001). Cognitive and applied knowledge post-training test scores of nurse-midwives/nurses were comparable to those of physicians. CHW (high-school graduates with 15 months or less formal health/nursing training) had the largest improvements in post-training applied knowledge with scores comparable to those of physicians and nurse-midwives/nurses. However, CHW cognitive knowledge post-training scores were significantly lower than those of physicians and nurses. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate training in VA, cognitive and applied knowledge required to determine perinatal COD is similar for physicians and nurses-midwives/nurses. This suggests that midwives and nurses may play a useful role in determining COD at the community level, which may be a practical way to improve the accuracy of COD data in rural, remote, geographic areas.

Estimating the number of HIV transmissions through reused syringes and needles in the Mbeya Region, Tanzania.

OBJECTIVE: HIV infection attributable to medical injections is suspected to be low, although case-control studies have not provided definite results. This study aims to determine the number of HIV infections caused by the reuse of syringes and needles in the Mbeya Region, Tanzania. METHODS: The direct identification or detection of HIV in syringes and needles under field conditions was not appropriate, therefore a surrogate marker consisting of two components for possible HIV transmission was used: insufficient sterilization, and blood remaining from a previous patient. The assumption was that HIV infection can only occur if both markers are positive. Samples were collected in nine health-care facilities. All syringes and needles prepared for use in these facilities were collected without prior notification. The samples were rinsed and the resulting fluid was cultured for bacteria. Traces of blood were detected by urine stick test for haemoglobin volumes > 0.0015 microliters. RESULTS: Bacterial contamination was found in 32.8% of the total 1219 syringes and needles; 67% was caused by improper handling of the equipment after sterilization. Blood was detected in 12.5% of the samples. In the following three sampling strata, both contamination criteria were positive either on the syringe or the needle: wards/outpatient departments (OPD), 1.39%; laboratories, 7.45%; expanded programme on immunization (EPI), < 0.1%. We calculated that from 1.1 million patients injected in wards/OPD in any 1 year, fewer than 13 become infected, in laboratories fewer than 12 (160,000 blood-taking procedures), and less than one child in the EPI (850,000 vaccinations). CONCLUSION: With an established AIDS intervention programme supporting the health system, less than 0.4% of the total annual incidence of 4500-8500 is attributable to medical injections in the Mbeya Region.