Single-stage total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures: an increased risk for periprosthetic joint infections?

BACKGROUND: Higher complication rates have been reported for total hip arthroplasty (THA) after osteosynthesis of proximal femur fractures (PFF). This study evaluated the infection risk for conversion of internal fixation of PFF to THA by a single-staged procedure in the absence of clear infection signs. METHODS: Patients undergoing a one-staged conversion to THA (2013-2018) after prior internal fixation of the proximal femur were included. Preoperative diagnostics with laboratory results, hip aspirations as well as intraoperative microbiology and sonication were assessed. Postoperative complications were recorded as well as patient demographics, duration between initial and conversion to THA, explanted osteosynthesis and implanted THA. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (24 male/34 female, 62.8 ± 14.5 years) were included with a mean time of 3.8 ± 7.5 years between internal fixation and conversion to THA (45 cementless, 3 cemented, 3 hybrid and 7 hybrid inverse THAs). Preoperative mean blood level CRP was 8.36 ± 14 mg/l (reference value < 5 mg/l) and leukocyte count was 7.11 ± 1.84^3/µl (4.5-10.000^3/µl). Fifty patients had intraoperative microbiological diagnostics, with either swabs in 86.2% and/or sonication in 29.3%. Positive microbiological results were recorded in 10% (5 of 50 patients), with pathogens identified being mainly Staphylococcus. Complications after conversion occurred in 9.6% including a postoperative low-grade infection rate of 5.8% after a mean of 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: This study found a positive microbiological test result in 10% of a one-stage conversion of PFF fixation to THA. Moreover, we found a high infection rate (5.8%) for early postoperative periprosthetic joint infection. Interestingly, CRP has not been proven to be an adequate parameter for low-grade infections or occult colonized implants. Therefore, we recommend a comprehensive pre- and intraoperative diagnostic including hip aspiration, swabs and sonication when considering one-staged revision.

Acromioclavicular joint separation treated with clavicular hook plate: a study of radiological and functional outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: ACJ separation is a common shoulder injury. A variety of surgical techniques for high-grade ACJ separations have been described. A commonly used technique represents open reduction and fixation by a hook plate. Goal of the present study was to evaluate radiographic and functional outcome in patients with high-grade ACJ separations following surgical treatment with a hook plate before and after surgery as well as after hook plate removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery with a hook plate due to traumatic ACJ separation between 2012 and 2014 were included and examined during a follow-up control. Demographic and clinical data as well as radiographs pre- and postoperatively were evaluated. Additionally, range of motion, DASH Score and Constant-Murley Score (CMS) were analysed in a follow-up examination. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's rank correlation were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 99 patients (88 m/11 w, 44 y) were included in the present study. 69 (64 m/5 w, 49 y) could be examined during long-term follow-up (38 month). After hook plate removal, the CCD increased significantly (13.7 ± 0.9 mm) compared to the hook plate in situ (9.9 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.000001). 68% of all patients achieved a full range of motion post-operatively. Main limitations of range of motion affected external rotation as well as ante-/retroversion. Mean DASH Score was 5.6 ± 1 points and CMS 90.0 ± 1.4 points. CONCLUSION: In contrast to a significant higher CCD after hook plate removal, nearly all patients achieved good to excellent functional results for DASH and CMS. This indicates that loss of reduction does not necessarily lead to poor functional outcome after ACJ separation surgery.

Trends in fracture development of the upper extremity in Germany-a population-based description of the past 15 years.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies investigating fracture development in Germany are not available especially with regard to demographic change. The primary aim of this study was to report trends in fracture development of the upper extremity in Germany between 2002 and 2017 and to evaluate changes over time. METHODS: Evaluating inpatient data from the German National Hospital Discharge Registry (International Classification of Diseases, ICD-10) between 2002 and 2017. Total count, incidences and percentage changes of the following fracture localizations were analysed: proximal humerus, distal humerus, proximal ulna, proximal radius, ulna diaphysis (including Monteggia lesion) and distal radius. Ten age groups for men and women were formed: 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74; 75-84; 85-90, and > 90 (years). RESULTS: The total count of proximal humeral fractures increased from 40,839 (2002, men/women 9967/30,872) to 59,545 (2017, men/women 14,484/45,061). Distal humeral fractures increased from 5912 (2002, men/women 1559/4353) to 6493 (2017, men/women1840/4653). The total count of forearm fractures increased from 68,636 (2002, men/women 17,186/51,450) to 89,040 (2017, men/women 20,185/68,855). Women were affected in 70-75% of all cases with rising incidences among nearly every age group in female patients. CONCLUSION: Total count of nearly every evaluated fracture increased. Also, incidences increased especially in the older female age groups. Fracture development already seems to reflect demographic changes in Germany.

[Trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures]. / Per- und subtrochantäre Femurfrakturen.

Proximal femoral fractures are one of the most common fractures, particularly in older people. The most common cause is a falling event due to dizziness and gait insecurity. In most cases prompt surgical treatment is necessary to achieve early mobilization and to reduce the risk of mortality. The aim is a stable osteosynthesis and patient-centered care. A great variety of implants are available for this purpose. Furthermore, perioperative management is important to prevent further problematic events, such as delirium, reoccurrence of falling events and to diagnose and adequately treat a pre-existing osteoporosis.