Short and long latency auditory evoked potentials in traumatic brain injury patients.

Short latency auditory nerve and brainstem evoked responses (BAERs) and long latency cortical auditory evoked responses (CAERs) in 75 long-term traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases were compared. CAERs were found to be significantly correlated with clinical disability as measured by the Disability Rating Scale, while BAERs were not. Also, BAER patterns were consistently and significantly less abnormal and less sensitive to overall dysfunction than CAER patterns. Findings support previous observations that BAERs have relatively little utility for evaluating in surviving TBI patients the degree of overall brain impairment. In general, long latency AEP patterns are better able to reflect the extent and severity of brain dysfunction and overall clinical condition than are short latency AEP patterns in long-term severe TBI patients, and these patterns should be obtained routinely in the evaluation of such patients.

Intermediate and long latency SEPs in relation to clinical disability in traumatic brain injury patients.

Intermediate (0-60 ms) and long latency (0-500 ms) somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) patterns were compared in terms of their relationship to degree of clinical disability in severe traumatic brain injury patients. Long latency (LL) SEP patterns correlated significantly with clinical disability as measured by the Disability Rating scale while intermediate latency (IL) SEP patterns did not. Evoked potential abnormality (EPA) scores based upon LL SEP patterns appear better able to reflect extent and severity of brain dysfunction and overall clinical condition than do IL SEP patterns for severe traumatic brain injury patients.