Epidural Catheterization in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Risk Assessment of Epidural Hematoma.

ABSTRACT: The potential benefits of epidural anesthesia on mortality, atrial fibrillation, and pulmonary complications must be weighed against the risk of epidural hematoma associated with intraoperative heparinization. This study aims to provide an updated assessment of the clinical risks of epidural anesthesia in cardiac surgery, focusing on the occurrence of epidural hematomas and subsequent paralysis. A systematic search of Embase, Medline, Ovid Central, Web of Science, and PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications between 1966 and 2022. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of the retrieved manuscripts. Studies reporting adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with epidural catheterization were included. The incidence of hematomas was calculated by dividing the number of hematomas by the total number of patients in the included studies. Risk calculations utilized various denominators based on the rigor of trial designs, and the risks of hematoma and paralysis were compared to other commonly encountered risks. The analysis included a total of 33,089 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with epidural catheterization. No epidural hematomas were reported across all published RCTs, prospective, and retrospective trials. Four case reports associated epidural hematoma with epidural catheterization and perioperative heparinization. The risks of epidural hematoma and subsequent paralysis were estimated at 1:7643 (95% CI 1:3860 to 380,916) and 1:10,190 (95% CI 1:4781 to 0:1), respectively. The risk of hematoma is similar to the non-obstetric population (1:5405; 95% CI 1:4784 to 6134). The risk of hematoma in cardiac surgery patients receiving epidural anesthesia is therefore similar to that observed in some other surgical non-obstetric populations commonly exposed to epidural catheterization.

Complications of Aesthetic Liposuction Performed in Isolation: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Aesthetic liposuction represents one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures worldwide. The purpose of this article is to examine and synthesize reported complication rates and explore the analytical prospect of possible patient or procedure-related predictive factors associated with specific complications. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase databases in line with specific criteria set to ensure an accurate assessment of complication rates; extracted data was synthesized through a random-effects model and meta-analysis of proportions. Results: A total of 60 studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 21,776 patients undergoing aesthetic liposuction. Most studies followed an observational design. The overall complication rate was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8%, 16%). When stratifying according to specific complications, the incidence of contour irregularities was determined to be 2% (95% CI 1%, 2%), seroma 2% (95% CI 1%; 2%), hematoma 1% (95% CI 0%, 1%), surgical site infection 1% (95% CI 1%, 2%), fibrosis or induration 1% (95% CI 1%, 2%), and pigmentary changes 1% (95% CI 1%, 1%), among others. A meta-regression to identify patient- or procedure-related factors associated with greater complication rates proved infeasible given the nature of the available data. Conclusion: Overall, liposuction demonstrated a relatively low complication rate profile, however, a considerable degree of heterogeneity exists within the examined literature preventing the recognition of predictive risk factors. While this calls for efforts to establish consensus on unified methods of outcomes reporting, the present meta-analysis can serve to provide practitioners with an evidence-based reference to improve informed consent and inform clinical guidelines, specifically pertaining to the incidence of commonly encountered complications in aesthetic liposuction, of which presently available survey studies and database queries remain devoid.

Introduction : La liposuccion esthétique est l'une des procédures esthétiques le plus souvent réalisées dans le monde. L'objectif de cet article est d'étudier et synthétiser les taux de complications rapportés et d'explorer la possibilité d'analyse de possibles facteurs prédictifs liés aux patients ou à la procédure en association avec des complications spécifiques. Méthodes : Une revue systématique a été exécutée à partir des bases de données Pubmed, Cochrane et Embase selon un ensemble de critères spécifiques pour assurer une évaluation précise des taux de complications; les données extraites ont été synthétisées par un modèle d'effets aléatoires et une méta-analyse des pourcentages. Résultats : Un total de 60 études a été inclus dans la méta-analyse, représentant 21 776 patients subissant une liposuccion esthétique. La plupart des études étaient observationnelles. Le taux global de complications était de 12% (IC à 95% : 8% à 16%). Après stratification selon des complications spécifiques, les incidences suivantes ­ parmi d'autres ­ ont été établies : irrégularités de contour a été établi à 2% (IC à 95% : 1% à 2%), sérome 2% (IC à 95% : 1% à 2%), hématome 1% (IC à 95% : 0% à 1%), infection du site opératoire 1% (IC à 95% : 1% à 2%), fibrose ou induration 1% (IC à 95% : 1% à 2%) et modification de la pigmentation 1% (IC à 95% : 1% à 1%). Une méta-régression visant à identifier des facteurs liés aux patients ou à la procédure pour les taux de complications les plus élevés s'est avérée infaisable, compte tenu de la nature des données disponibles. Conclusion : Globalement, la liposuccion a montré un relativement bas profil en termes de taux de complications. Il existe cependant une hétérogénéité considérable dans les publications étudiées, empêchant d'identifier des facteurs de risque prédictifs. Cela appelle à des efforts en vue de l'établissement d'un consensus sur des méthodes uniformisées de déclaration des résultats, mais la présente méta-analyse peut permettre aux praticiens de disposer d'une référence basée sur des constatations probantes pour améliorer le consentement éclairé et enrichir les lignes directrices cliniques, en particulier pour ce qui concerne l'incidence des complications fréquemment vues dans la liposuccion esthétique. En effet, les études, enquêtes et bases de données actuellement disponibles en sont dépourvues.

Investigation into the clinical performance of rectus sheath block in reducing postoperative pain following surgical intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background and Aims: Rectus sheath block (RSB) is an effective postoperative pain control technique in abdominal surgical procedures. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and outcome data of patients undergoing RSB compared to the standard of care in both laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022372596). The search was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RSB effectiveness on postoperative pain to any standard general anaesthesia technique (control). We systematically explored PubMed, Medline, Central, Scopus and Web of Science for RCTs from inception to September 2023. The primary outcome was the evaluation of pain scores at rest 0-2, 10-12 and 12-24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the analysis of postoperative intravenous (IV) morphine equivalent consumption at 24-h. A risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (ROB 2.0, Cochrane, Copenhagen, Denmark) assessment and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE, Cochrane, Copenhagen, Denmark) analysis was conducted to evaluate the quality of the RCTs. Results: Twenty RCTs involving 708 participants who received RSB intervention and 713 who received alternative analgesic care were included. RSB pain scores were significantly lower than control at 0-2 h (P < 0.001) and 10-12 h (P < 0.001) postoperatively. No significant effect was observed at 24 h (P = 0.11). RSB performance compared to control in 24-h IV morphine equivalency in milligrams was significantly lower (P < 0.001). Conclusion: RSB implementation was associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and decreased opioid consumption in IV morphine equivalency up to 24 h following surgical intervention.

Robotic Anesthesia: A Vision for 2050.

The last 2 decades have brought important developments in anesthetic technology, including robotic anesthesia. Anesthesiologists titrate the administration of pharmacological agents to the patients' physiology and the needs of surgery, using a variety of sophisticated equipment (we use the term "pilots of the human biosphere"). In anesthesia, increased safety seems coupled with increased technology and innovation. This article gives an overview of the technological developments over the past decades, both in terms of pharmacological and mechanical robots, which have laid the groundwork for robotic anesthesia: target-controlled drug infusion systems, closed-loop administration of anesthesia and sedation, mechanical robots for intubation, and the latest development in the world of communication with the arrival of artificial intelligence (AI)-derived chatbots are presented.

Beyond the Echo: The Evolution and Revolution of Ultrasound in Anesthesia.

This article explores the evolving role of ultrasound technology in anesthesia. Ultrasound emerged decades ago, offering clinicians noninvasive, economical, radiation-free, and real-time imaging capabilities. It might seem that such an old technology with apparent limitations might have had its day, but this review discusses both the current applications of ultrasound (in nerve blocks, vascular access, and airway management) and then, more speculatively, shows how integration of advanced ultrasound modalities such as contrast-enhanced imaging with virtual reality (VR), or nanotechnology can alter perioperative patient care. This article will also explore the potential of robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) in augmenting ultrasound-guided anesthetic procedures and their implications for medical practice and education.

The ITAG Spinal Simulator (ISS): A New Simulator for Difficult Lumbar Punctures.

Lumbar punctures present a specific challenge in various medical specialties; appropriate simulators need to take into account the specific technical difficulties related to a realistic patient population, but currently fail to address the variety of anatomical differences seen in practice. We interviewed several leaders in the field of anesthesiology with extensive experience in lumbar puncture procedures, subsequently developing a more realistic training simulator. This novel simulator was built using silicone-based materials and advanced 3D-printing techniques, specifically tailored to be capable of mimicking a variety of patient populations without having to dispose of essential components after each use. Two Anesthesiologists with at least 20 years of experience were asked to perform several spinal tap procedures. Following testing, experts rated the simulator based on its procedural realism, usefulness in improving skill set, and overall simulation efficacy.The gathered validation outcomes based on the questionnaire evaluations completed by experts show excellent preliminary results, with an overall mean score of 4.8 out of 5 (96%). These preliminary results highlight the potential for the simulator's application as a tool to improve medical simulation education and future patient outcomes.

Utilizing Deep Learning to Identify an Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block Target Zone.

Ultrasound guided nerve blocks are increasingly being used in perioperative care as a means of safely delivering analgesia. Unfortunately, identifying nerves in ultrasound images presents a challenging task for novice anesthesiologists. Drawing from online resources, here we attempted to address this issue by developing a deep learning algorithm capable of automatically identifying the transversus abdominis plane region in ultrasound images. Training of our dataset was done using the U-Net architecture and artificial augmentation was done to optimize our training dataset. The Dice score coefficient was used to evaluate our model, with further evaluation against a test set composed of manually drawn labels from a pool of (n=10) expert anesthesiologists.Across all labelers the model achieved a global Dice score of 73.31% over the entire test set. These preliminary results highlight the potential effectiveness of this model as a future ultrasound decision support system in the field of anesthesia.

Pro-Con Debate: Should All General Anesthesia Be Done Using Target-Controlled Propofol Infusion Guided by Objective Monitoring of Depth of Anesthesia?

In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss whether all general anesthesia should be done using target-controlled propofol anesthesia guided by monitoring of depth of anesthesia. This is an ongoing debate since more than 25 years, representing a scientific, cultural as well as geographical divide in the anesthesia community. The Pro side argues that total intravenous anesthesia causes less postoperative nausea and higher patient satisfaction than anesthesia using volatile anesthetics. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of anesthetic agents allows for better titration of intravenous anesthesia using pharmacokinetic models. Processed EEG monitors, such as bispectral index monitoring, allows for better assessing the effect of TCI anesthesia than solely assessment of clinical parameters, such as ECG or blood pressure. The combination of TCI propofol and objective depth of anesthesia monitoring allows creating a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile for each patient. Finally, anesthesia using volatile anesthetics poses health risks for healthcare professionals and contributes to greenhouse effect. The Con side argues that for procedures accompanied with ischemia and reperfusion injury of an organ or tissue and for patients suffering from a severe inflammation' the use of volatile anesthetics might well have its advantages above propofol. In times of sudden shortage of drugs, volatile anesthetics can overcome the restriction in the operating theater or even on the intensive care unit, which is another advantage. Volatile anesthetics can be used for induction of anesthesia when IV access is impossible, end-tidal measurements of volatile anesthetic concentration allows confirmation that patients receive anesthetics. Taking environmental considerations into account, both propofol and volatile anesthetics bear certain harm to the environment, be it as waste product or as greenhouse gases. The authors therefore suggest to carefully considering advantages and disadvantages for each patient in its according environment. A well-balanced choice based on the available literature is recommended. The authors recommend careful consideration of advantages and disadvantages of each technique when tailoring an anesthetic to meet patient needs. Where appropriate, anesthesia providers are encouraged to account for unique features of anesthetic drug behavior, patient-reported and observed postoperative outcomes, and economic and environmental considerations when choosing any of the 2 described techniques.

Clinical Performance of Decision Support Systems in Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Medical technology is expanding at an alarming rate, with its integration into health care often reflected by the constant evolution of best practices. This rapid expansion of available treatment modalities, when coupled with progressively increasing amounts of consequential data for health care professionals to manage, creates an environment where complex and timely decision-making without the aid of technology is inconceivable. Decision support systems (DSSs) were, therefore, developed as a means of supporting the clinical duties of health care professionals through immediate point-of-care referencing. The integration of DSS can be especially useful in critical care medicine, where the combination of complex pathologies, the multitude of parameters, and the general state of patients require swift informed decision-making. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate DSS outcomes compared to the standard of care (SOC) in critical care medicine. METHODS: This systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis were performed after the EQUATOR networks Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). We systematically explored PubMed, Ovid, Central, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2000 to December 2021. The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate whether DSS is more effective than SOC practice in critical care medicine within the following disciplines: anesthesia, emergency department (ED), and intensive care unit (ICU). A random-effects model was used to estimate the effect of DSS performance, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in both continuous and dichotomous results. Outcome-based, department-specific, and study-design subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 34 RCTs were included for analysis. In total, 68,102 participants received DSS intervention, while 111,515 received SOC. Analysis of the continuous (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.66; 95% CI [-1.01 to -0.30]; P < .01) and binary outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, [0.44-0.91]; P < .01) was statistically significant and suggests that health interventions are marginally improved with DSS integration in comparison to SOC in critical care medicine. Subgroup analysis in anesthesia (SMD, -0.89; 95% CI, [-1.71 to -0.07]; P < .01) and ICU (SMD, -0.63; 95% CI [-1.14 to -0.12]; P < .01) were deemed statistically supportive of DSS in improving outcome, with evidence being indeterminate in the field of emergency medicine (SMD, -0.24; 95% CI, [-0.71 to 0.23]; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: DSSs were associated with a beneficial impact in critical care medicine on a continuous and binary scale; however, the ED subgroup was found to be inconclusive. Additional RCTs are required to determine the effectiveness of DSS in critical care medicine.

Ultrasound Calculation of Fat Volume for Liposuction: A Clinical Software Validation.

BACKGROUND: Fat manipulation procedures such as liposuction contain a degree of subjectivity primarily guided by the surgeon's visual or tactile perception of the underlying fat. Currently, there is no cost-effective, direct method to objectively measure fat depth and volume in real time. OBJECTIVES: Utilizing innovative ultrasound-based software, the authors aimed to validate fat tissue volume and distribution measurements in the preoperative setting. METHODS: Eighteen participants were recruited to evaluate the accuracy of the new software. Recruited participants underwent ultrasound scans within the preoperative markings of the study area before surgery. Ultrasound-estimated fat profiles were generated with the in-house software and compared directly with the intraoperative aspirated fat recorded after gravity separation. RESULTS: Participants' mean age and BMI were 47.6 (11.3) years and 25.6 (2.3) kg/m2, respectively. Evaluation of trial data showed promising results following the use of a Bland Altman agreement analysis. For the 18 patients and 44 volumes estimated, 43 of 44 measurements fell within a confidence interval of 95% when compared with the clinical lipoaspirate (dry) volumes collected postsurgery. The bias was estimated at 9.15 mL with a standard deviation of 17.08 mL and 95% confidence interval between -24.34 mL and 42.63 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative fat assessment measurements agreed significantly with intraoperative lipoaspirate volumes. The pilot study demonstrates, for the first time, a novel companion tool with the prospect of supporting surgeons in surgical planning, measuring, and executing the transfer of adipose tissues.

How Big Is Too Big? Exploring the Relationship between Breast Implant Volume and Postoperative Complication Rates in Primary Breast Augmentations.

There is no consensus regarding implant size as an independent risk factor for complications in primary breast augmentation. Choosing appropriate implant volume is an integral part of the preoperative planning process. The current study aims to assess the relationship between implant size and the development of complications following augmentation mammaplasty. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing primary breast augmentation at the Westmount Institute of Plastic Surgery between January 2000 and December 2021 was conducted. Demographics, implant characteristics, surgical technique, postoperative complications, and follow-up times were recorded. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors, which were then included in multivariate logistic regressions of implant volume and implant volume/body mass index (BMI) ratio regarding complications. Results: A total of 1017 patients (2034 breasts) were included in this study. The average implant volume used was 321.4 ± 57.5 cm3 (range: 110-605). Increased volume and volume/BMI ratio were associated with a significant increase in risk of implant rupture (odds ratio = 1.012, P < 0.001 and 1.282, P < 0.001 respectively). Rates of asymmetry were significantly associated with increases in implant volume and volume/BMI ratio (odds ratio = 1.005, P = 0.004 and 1.151, P < 0.001, respectively). No single implant volume or volume/BMI ratio above which risks of complications significantly increase was identified. Conclusions: Implant rupture and postoperative asymmetries are positively correlated with bigger implant volumes. Implant size could likely be a useful independent predictor of certain complications, especially in patients with high implant to BMI ratios.

Description of a Novel Web-Based Liposuction System to Estimate Fat Volume and Distribution.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative planning for liposuction is vital to ensure safe practice and patient satisfaction. However, current standards of fat assessment before surgery are guided by subjective methods such as visual inspection, skin-pinch tests, and waist circumference measurements. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop an inexpensive software-based tool that utilizes ultrasound (US) imaging and an online platform to accurately simulate regional subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) distribution and safe volume estimation for liposuction procedures. METHODS: The authors present a web-based platform with integrated 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) simulations of SAT to support liposuction planning and execution. SAT-Map was constructed using multiple sub-applications linked with the python framework programming language (Wilmington, DE). RESULTS: The SAT-Map interface provides an intuitive and fluid means of generating patient-specific models and volumetric data. To further accommodate this, an operational manual was prepared to achieve consistent visualization and examination of estimated SAT content. The system currently supports static 2D heatmap simulation and 3D interactive virtual modelling of the SAT distribution. Supplementary clinical studies are needed to evaluate SAT-Map's clinical performance and practicality. CONCLUSIONS: SAT-Map revolutionizes the concept of preoperative planning for liposuction by developing the first combined web-based software that objectively simulates fat distribution and measures safe liposuction volume. Our software approach presents a cost-efficient, accessible, and user-friendly system offering multiple advantages over current SAT assessment modalities. The immediacy of clinically accurate 3D virtual simulation provides objective support to surgeons towards improving patient conversation, outcomes, and satisfaction in liposuction procedures.

The Development of a Novel Bariatric Laparoscopic Simulator.

Bariatric surgery presents a specific challenge in surgical education; simulators need to take into account the specific technical difficulties related to the patient population but also to various types of surgery. We interviewed several leaders in the fields of bariatric and general surgery with experience in laparoscopic surgery and developed a bariatric-specific laparoscopic simulator. This novel simulator was constructed using a variety of silicone-based materials and 3D printing techniques to be reusable and adjustable for a variety of procedures, with no essential components being disposed of following each use. Expert surgeons (n=4) with knowledge on bariatric procedures were recruited and asked to perform a simple simulated laparoscopic procedure. Following testing, participants were asked to complete a survey and rate the simulator based on its physical attributes, global realism, usefulness in improving surgical skills, and overall surgical experience. Face and content validation outcomes based on the questionnaire evaluations completed by expert surgeons showed very good results, with an overall mean score of 4.3 out of 5 (86%). These preliminary results highlight the potential for the simulator's application as a tool to improve bariatric surgical education and patient outcomes.