Will They Show? Predictors of Nonattendance for Scheduled Screening Colonoscopies at a Safety Net Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy can reduce colorectal cancer-related mortality by up to 90% through early detection and polyp removal. Despite this, nonattendance rates for scheduled colonoscopies have been reported ranging from 4.1% to as high as 67% depending on the population studied. AIM: The aim of the study was to measure the nonattendance rate for scheduled screening colonoscopy at a large safety net hospital and identify predictors of nonattendance within this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a population-based study of 1186 adults who were scheduled to undergo screening colonoscopy at a safety net hospital as part of their routine preventative health program. Health systems variables were assessed including procedure time and scheduling patterns as well as patient-centered variables such as socioeconomic indicators and specific comorbid diagnoses. Associations with nonattendance were examined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall rate of nonattendance for scheduled screening colonoscopy was 33%. A multivariate model was constructed to predict nonattendance revealing that private payer status [odds ratio (OR)=0.368, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.225, 0.602] and prior colonoscopy (OR=0.371, 95% CI: 0.209, 0.656) were associated with greater attendance rates. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR=2.034, 95% CI: 1.239, 3.341), afternoon procedure time (OR=1.807, 95% CI: 1.137, 2.871), and a greater interval time between the date the colonoscopy was ordered and the date the colonoscopy was scheduled to occur (OR=1.005, 95% CI: 1.001, 1.009) were independently associated with nonattendance when controlling for age, sex, and race. CONCLUSIONS: Specific predictors for scheduled screening colonoscopy nonattendance at a safety net hospital can be identified. These findings can be used to tailor community-based interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening rates.

Barrett's esophagus patients are becoming younger: analysis of a large United States dataset.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE), a complication of long-term gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), has been reported to affect 6-8% of those with heartburn. Most patients are males, Caucasians and middle aged. However, there are no recent demographic studies that evaluated the proportion trends of BE. We aimed to assess proportion trends of BE over an 11-year period, using a very large national dataset. METHODS: This was a population-based analysis of the national Explorys dataset. Explorys is an aggregate of electronic medical record database representing over 54 million patients. Proportions of BE's variables such as age, gender, race, BMI, and treatment with PPI were recorded during an 11-year period. BE patients were classified into seven age groups (15-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, ≥ 70 years old). Secular trends of the proportion of BE were assessed over time for each age group. RESULTS: The majority of patients diagnosed with BE were ≥ 70 years old across all calendar years. However, the proportion of BE patients who were ≥ 70 years old has significantly decreased between 2006 and 2016 (- 19.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with BE increased in all age groups but most prominently in the age groups, 30-39: 2.07%, 40-49: 3.64%, 50-59: 6.89%, 60-69: 6.18%, p < 0.001. BE was significantly more common in those who were Caucasian and male. PPI usage fell significantly in those who were ≥ 70 years old (- 20.8%, p < 0.001), but increased in the other remaining age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of BE patients who are 70 years and older has significantly dropped. Younger patients' groups have demonstrated the highest increase in the proportion of BE patients, especially those in the age group of 30-39 years old.

The Changing Epidemiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Are Patients Getting Younger?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease globally with increasing prevalence and consequently greater burden on the Healthcare system. Traditionally, GERD has been considered a disease of middle-aged and older people. Since risk factors for GERD affect a growing number of the adult population, concerns have been raised that increasingly younger people may develop GERD. We aim to determine if the proportion of younger patients has increased among the GERD population. METHODS: The incidence of GERD as well as several variables were evaluated during an 11-year period. Explorys was used to evaluate datasets at a "Universal" and Healthcare system in northern Ohio to determine if trends at a local level reflected those at a universal level. GERD patients were classified into 7 age groups (15-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and ≥ 70 years). RESULTS: The proportion of patients with GERD increased in all age groups, except for those who were ≥ 70 years in the universal dataset (P < 0.001) and those who were ≥ 60 years in the Healthcare system (P < 0.001). The greatest rise was seen in 30-39 years in both datasets (P < 0.001). Similarly, the proportion of GERD patients who were using proton pump inhibitors increased in all age groups except for those who were ≥ 70 years in both datasets (P < 0.001), with the greatest increase being the group 30-39 years (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Over the last decade, there has been a significant increase in the proportion of younger patients with GERD, especially those within the age range of 30-39 years.