Interpatient Variation in Rivaroxaban and Apixaban Plasma Concentrations in Routine Care.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely prescribed for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). An important advantage of DOACs is that routine monitoring of an anticoagulation response is not necessary. Nevertheless, because of their mechanism of action, a DOAC anticoagulation effect can be inferred based on the observed plasma concentration. However, there is a paucity of data relating to observed interpatient variation in DOAC plasma concentrations in the postmarket clinical setting. METHODS: We determined rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentrations in patients with AF during routine clinic visits. RESULTS: Among 243 patients (rivaroxaban, n = 94; apixaban, n = 149) enrolled in this study, a 60- and 50-fold interpatient variation in plasma concentration was observed for rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Approximately 12% of patients receiving rivaroxaban and 13% of patients receiving apixaban exceeded the 95th percentile for predicted maximum plasma concentration observed in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: In this routine-care setting, rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentrations tended to be more variable than those observed in clinical trials. Identification of additional clinical and molecular determinants that more fully predict patients at risk for excessively high or low DOAC concentrations may enable a more precise DOAC dosing regimen for the individual patient.

Profound reduction in tamoxifen active metabolite endoxifen in a breast cancer patient treated with rifampin prior to initiation of an anti-TNFα biologic for ulcerative colitis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen, a common anti-estrogen breast cancer medication, is a prodrug that undergoes bioactivation via cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYP2D6 and to a lesser degree, CYP3A4 to form the active metabolite endoxifen. With an increasing use of oral anti-cancer drugs, the risk for drug-drug interactions mediated by enzyme inhibitors and inducers may also be expected to increase. Here we report the first case demonstrating a potent drug-drug interaction in a real-world clinical setting between tamoxifen and rifampin in a breast cancer patient being treated concurrently for ulcerative colitis. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a patient on adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer that was prescribed rifampin for TB prophylaxis prior to initiation of an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agent due to worsening ulcerative colitis. This 39 year old Caucasian woman had been followed by our personalized medicine clinic where CYP2D6 genotyping and therapeutic monitoring of tamoxifen and endoxifen levels had been carried out. The patient, known to be a CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer, had a previous history of therapeutic endoxifen levels. Upon admission to hospital for a major flare of her ulcerative colitis a clinical decision was made to initiate an anti-TNFα biological agent. Due to concerns regarding latent TB, rifampin as an anti-mycobacterial agent was initiated which the patient was only able tolerate for 10 days. Interestingly, her plasma endoxifen concentration measured 2 weeks after cessation of rifampin was sub-therapeutic at 15.8 nM and well below her previous endoxifen levels which exceeded 40 nM. CONCLUSION: Rifampin should be avoided in patients on tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer unless continued tamoxifen efficacy can be assured through endoxifen monitoring. Drug-drug interactions can pose a significant risk of sub-therapeutic benefit in tamoxifen patients.